SEISA Team Racing Champs

# SchoolTeam Rec.
1 Texas A&M University at Galveston Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 9–0
2 Texas A&M University Texas A&M University Aggies 5–4
3 Tulane University Tulane University Green Wave 3–6
4 University of Texas University of Texas Longhorns 1–8

Pre-event forecast

Fitted on the 1,446 team race matches sailed before 2013-04-20, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 15 of 18 matches (83%) with a log-loss of 0.297 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went well for the forecast. Orderliness +0.43 ± 0.42: an orderly event, more orderly than 87% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.

PlaceSchool Pred. Strength Boats (skipper / crew, boat value) Pred. win % Recordvs forecast
1Texas A&M University at Galveston
Aggies
15.71
school +0.27
Nicholas Chong / Sara Stafford 1.35
Collin Weston / Brittney Crawford 2.15
Benjamin Kennady / Rachel Mcmahon 1.75
93%9–0 (100%)+0.6
2Texas A&M University
Aggies
23.67Travis James / Megan Woodring
Travis Conger / Katherine Biancardi
Colin Feik / Jennifer Bender
55%5–4 (56%)+0.1
3Tulane University
Green Wave
32.72
home +0.36
Alexandra Payne / Susan Herndon
Jessica Oswalt / Lee Evans
Jacob Shulist / Evan Kollath
28%3–6 (33%)+0.5
4University of Texas
Longhorns
42.50Ellen Nielsen / Marissa Morrison
Masie Comen / Thomas Settle
William Cragin / Dana Dinsmore
24%1–8 (11%)−1.2

Surprisal: who beat their rating

Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.

PlaceSchoolStrength Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
1Texas A&M University at Galveston5.718.719–08.4≥+3.000.953%
3Tulane University2.723.043–62.5+0.320.149%
2Texas A&M University3.673.745–44.9+0.070.065%
4University of Texas2.501.401–82.2−1.090.994%

By skipper

SkipperSchoolValue Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
Nicholas ChongTexas A&M University at Galveston1.354.359–08.4≥+3.000.953%
Collin WestonTexas A&M University at Galveston2.155.159–08.4≥+3.000.953%
Benjamin KennadyTexas A&M University at Galveston1.754.759–08.4≥+3.000.953%
Alexandra PayneTulane University1.011.343–62.5+0.320.149%
Jessica OswaltTulane University0.971.293–62.5+0.320.149%
Jacob ShulistTulane University-0.170.163–62.5+0.320.149%
Travis JamesTexas A&M University0.630.705–44.9+0.070.065%
Travis CongerTexas A&M University0.670.745–44.9+0.070.065%
Colin FeikTexas A&M University1.831.905–44.9+0.070.065%
Ellen NielsenUniversity of Texas1.180.091–82.2−1.090.994%
Masie ComenUniversity of Texas0.69-0.401–82.2−1.090.994%
William CraginUniversity of Texas0.08-1.011–82.2−1.090.994%

Match by match

Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).

Rd#WinnerLoser P(winner)
11Texas A&M University at GalvestonTexas A&M University92%
12Texas A&M UniversityUniversity of Texas81%
13Tulane UniversityUniversity of Texas49%upset
14Texas A&M UniversityTulane University75%
15Texas A&M University at GalvestonTulane University95%
16Texas A&M University at GalvestonUniversity of Texas96%
27Texas A&M University at GalvestonTexas A&M University88%
28Texas A&M UniversityUniversity of Texas78%
29University of TexasTulane University47%upset
210Texas A&M UniversityTulane University74%
211Texas A&M University at GalvestonTulane University95%
212Texas A&M University at GalvestonUniversity of Texas96%
313Texas A&M University at GalvestonTexas A&M University87%
314Texas A&M UniversityUniversity of Texas77%
315Tulane UniversityUniversity of Texas54%
316Tulane UniversityTexas A&M University27%upset
317Texas A&M University at GalvestonTulane University94%
318Texas A&M University at GalvestonUniversity of Texas95%

Round 1

TeamRec.AggiesAggiesWaveLonghorns
Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies3–0✕WWW
Texas A&M University Aggies2–1L✕WW
Tulane University Green Wave1–2LL✕W
University of Texas Longhorns0–3LLL✕

Round 2

TeamRec.AggiesAggiesWaveLonghorns
Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies3–0✕WWW
Texas A&M University Aggies2–1L✕WW
Tulane University Green Wave0–3LL✕L
University of Texas Longhorns1–2LLW✕

Round 3

TeamRec.AggiesAggiesWaveLonghorns
Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies3–0✕WWW
Texas A&M University Aggies1–2L✕LW
Tulane University Green Wave2–1LW✕W
University of Texas Longhorns0–3LLL✕
# Winner Loser Pos.
1 Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 1-2-6 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 3-4-5 DNF
2 Texas A&M University Aggies 1-2-5 def. University of Texas Longhorns 3-4-6
3 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-3 def. University of Texas Longhorns 4-5-6
4 Texas A&M University Aggies 1-2-4 def. Tulane University Green Wave 3-5-6
5 Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 1-2-4 def. Tulane University Green Wave 3-5-6
6 Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 1-2-3 def. University of Texas Longhorns 4-5-6
7 Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 2-3-4 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 1-5-6
8 Texas A&M University Aggies 1-4-5 def. University of Texas Longhorns 2-3-6
9 University of Texas Longhorns 1-2-4 def. Tulane University Green Wave 3-5-6 DNS
10 Texas A&M University Aggies 1-2-4 def. Tulane University Green Wave 3-5-6
11 Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 1-2-5 def. Tulane University Green Wave 3-4-6
12 Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 1-2-3 def. University of Texas Longhorns 4-5-6
13 Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 1-2-6 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 3-4-5
14 Texas A&M University Aggies 1-2-6 def. University of Texas Longhorns 3-4-5
15 Tulane University Green Wave 2-3-4 def. University of Texas Longhorns 1-5-6
16 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-5 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 3-4-6
17 Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 1-2-5 def. Tulane University Green Wave 3-4-6
18 Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 1-2-3 def. University of Texas Longhorns 4-5-6

Conditions — 04/20/2013 (8am–6pm)

☀️Clear sky
Humidity 48%  ·  Pressure 1023.1 hPa

Temperature

61°F
↑ 65°F   ↓ 53°F
Feels like 57°F

Wind

● from   ▲ toward
8.2 kn
avg  ·  max 11.5 kn
Gusts to 22.0 kn
From ENE (64°)

Sky & Precipitation

Cloud cover0% Sunshine11.0 hrs Humidity48% Pressure1023.1 hPa

What this breeze does at Tulane — from fleet racing

Breeze: NE about 10 kn (weather reanalysis in the scorer’s units)
In fleet races at Tulane in this breeze: a favourites’ day (+0.07)
Favourites’ conditions: in fleet racing here the results follow the ratings more closely than usual, and the top seeds hold their places.

Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.07 means a rating gap counts about 6% more than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.

Orderliness beyond the fleet at Tulane by wind direction (angle) and speed (rings), fitted surface; dots are labelled regatta-days, ★ this regatta (38 labelled fleet-race days at Tulane).

From the notes

Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.

All notes →