Oxford Classic Team Race

# SchoolTeam Rec.
1 Northwestern University Northwestern University Wildcats 2–0
2 Miami University Miami University Miami University 1–1
3 Ohio State University Ohio State University The Ohio State Univ. 0–2

Pre-event forecast

Fitted on the 3,694 team race matches sailed before 2014-04-12, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 3 of 3 matches (100%) with a log-loss of 0.486 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went about as expected for the forecast. vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.

PlaceSchool Pred. Strength Boats (skipper / crew, boat value) Pred. win % Recordvs forecast
1Northwestern University
Wildcats
10.54
school +0.24
Carson Potter / Madeline Deysine
Zachary Bannon / Yi Zhang
Connor Schmitt / Aislinn Mcmillan -0.29
66%2–0 (100%)+0.7
2Miami University
Miami University
20.14
home +0.34
Otto Wenzler / Madison Eger
Jose Avila / Brett Watson
Max Burson / Lauren Stickland
48%1–1 (50%)+0.1
3Ohio State University
The Ohio State Univ.
3-0.05Andrew Lenzo / Connor Basile
David Aspery / Anatoliy Kryvenko
Monica Julian / No Show
38%0–2 (0%)−0.8

Surprisal: who beat their rating

Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.

PlaceSchoolStrength Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
1Northwestern University0.543.542–01.3≥+3.001.243%
2Miami University0.140.251–10.9+0.110.073%
3Ohio State University-0.05-3.050–20.7≤−3.001.3>99%

By skipper

SkipperSchoolValue Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)

Match by match

Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).

Rd#WinnerLoser P(winner)
11Northwestern UniversityMiami University60%
12Northwestern UniversityOhio State University71%
13Miami UniversityOhio State University55%

Round 1

TeamRec.WildcatsUniversityUniv.
Northwestern University Wildcats2–0✕WW
Miami University Miami University1–1L✕W
Ohio State University The Ohio State Univ.0–2LL✕
# Winner Loser Pos.
1 Northwestern University Wildcats 1-2-3 def. Miami University Miami University 4-5-6
2 Northwestern University Wildcats 1-2-4 def. Ohio State University The Ohio State Univ. 3-5-6
3 Miami University Miami University 1-2-4 def. Ohio State University The Ohio State Univ. 3-5-6

Conditions — 04/12/2014 (8am–6pm)

🌤️Partly cloudy
Humidity 65%  ·  Pressure 1017.4 hPa

Temperature

64°F
↑ 73°F   ↓ 43°F
Feels like 61°F

Wind

● from   ▲ toward
9.6 kn
avg  ·  max 13.4 kn
Gusts to 26.8 kn
From S (172°)

Sky & Precipitation

Cloud cover53% Sunshine10.8 hrs Humidity65% Pressure1017.4 hPa

What this breeze does at Miami University — from fleet racing

Breeze: S about 11 kn (weather reanalysis in the scorer’s units)
In fleet races at Miami University in this breeze: an underdogs’ day (−0.03)
Underdogs’ conditions: in fleet racing here the fleet bunches up and lower-rated boats beat the seeds more often than usual.

Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.03 means a rating gap counts about 3% less than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.

Orderliness beyond the fleet at Miami University by wind direction (angle) and speed (rings), fitted surface; dots are labelled regatta-days, ★ this regatta (only 4 labelled days at Miami University, so the surface is mostly the all-venue pattern).

From the notes

Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.

All notes →