SEISA Team Racing Championship

# SchoolTeam Rec.
1 Texas A&M University at Galveston Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 7–2
2 Tulane University Tulane University Green Wave 7–2
3 University of Texas University of Texas Longhorns 2–7
4 Texas A&M University Texas A&M University Aggies 2–7

Pre-event forecast

Fitted on the 3,730 team race matches sailed before 2014-04-26, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 14 of 18 matches (78%) with a log-loss of 0.442 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went well for the forecast. Orderliness −0.06 ± 0.41: a typical event, more orderly than 37% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.

PlaceSchool Pred. Strength Boats (skipper / crew, boat value) Pred. win % Recordvs forecast
1Texas A&M University at Galveston
Aggies
14.64
school −0.07
Ryan Murphy / Rachel Mcmahon 1.41
Jacob Hafemeister / Kayla Sjoberg 1.21
Trey Hartman / Brittney Crawford 1.92
84%7–2 (78%)−0.6
2Tulane University
Green Wave
24.01Alexandra Payne / Benjamin Kaplan 1.41
Michael Swanson / Sierra Orlowski
Jessica Oswalt / Amanda Earl 1.08
71%7–2 (78%)+0.6
3University of Texas
Longhorns
41.63
school −0.20, home +0.33
Alexander Judd / Brinley Kranz
Ashlynd Epstein / Hunter Ledonne
Masie Comen / Michael Eiche 0.99 0–6
Masie Comen / Aubrey Leblanc 1.00 2–1
17%2–7 (22%)+0.5
4Texas A&M University
Aggies
32.12Travis Conger / Sarah Turner 0.76
Erin Hawk / Stephanie Meals
Megan Woodring / Christine Sicktich
28%2–7 (22%)−0.5

Surprisal: who beat their rating

Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.

PlaceSchoolStrength Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
2Tulane University4.014.517–26.4+0.500.247%
3University of Texas1.632.052–71.5+0.410.148%
4Texas A&M University2.121.702–72.5−0.420.282%
1Texas A&M University at Galveston4.644.147–27.6−0.500.286%

By skipper

SkipperSchoolValue Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
Alexandra PayneTulane University1.411.917–26.4+0.500.247%
Michael SwansonTulane University1.011.517–26.4+0.500.247%
Jessica OswaltTulane University1.081.587–26.4+0.500.247%
Alexander JuddUniversity of Texas0.350.762–71.5+0.410.148%
Masie ComenUniversity of Texas0.991.402–71.5+0.410.148%
Ashlynd EpsteinUniversity of Texas-0.360.062–71.5+0.410.148%
Travis CongerTexas A&M University0.760.342–72.5−0.420.282%
Erin HawkTexas A&M University0.580.152–72.5−0.420.282%
Megan WoodringTexas A&M University0.29-0.132–72.5−0.420.282%
Ryan MurphyTexas A&M University at Galveston1.410.917–27.6−0.500.286%
Jacob HafemeisterTexas A&M University at Galveston1.210.707–27.6−0.500.286%
Trey HartmanTexas A&M University at Galveston1.921.427–27.6−0.500.286%

Match by match

Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).

Rd#WinnerLoser P(winner)
11Texas A&M University at GalvestonUniversity of Texas97%
12Tulane UniversityTexas A&M University87%
13Tulane UniversityTexas A&M University at Galveston31%upset
14University of TexasTexas A&M University37%upset
15Tulane UniversityUniversity of Texas92%
16Texas A&M University at GalvestonTexas A&M University93%
27Texas A&M University at GalvestonUniversity of Texas95%
28Tulane UniversityTexas A&M University87%
29Texas A&M University at GalvestonTulane University64%
210Texas A&M UniversityUniversity of Texas63%
211Tulane UniversityUniversity of Texas91%
212Texas A&M University at GalvestonTexas A&M University92%
313Texas A&M University at GalvestonUniversity of Texas95%
314Tulane UniversityTexas A&M University87%
315Texas A&M University at GalvestonTulane University62%
316University of TexasTexas A&M University38%upset
317Tulane UniversityUniversity of Texas91%
318Texas A&M UniversityTexas A&M University at Galveston9%upset

Round 1

TeamRec.AggiesWaveLonghornsAggies
Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies2–1✕LWW
Tulane University Green Wave3–0W✕WW
University of Texas Longhorns1–2LL✕W
Texas A&M University Aggies0–3LLL✕

Round 2

TeamRec.AggiesWaveLonghornsAggies
Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies3–0✕WWW
Tulane University Green Wave2–1L✕WW
University of Texas Longhorns0–3LL✕L
Texas A&M University Aggies1–2LLW✕

Round 3

TeamRec.AggiesWaveLonghornsAggies
Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies2–1✕WWL
Tulane University Green Wave2–1L✕WW
University of Texas Longhorns1–2LL✕W
Texas A&M University Aggies1–2WLL✕
# Winner Loser Pos.
1 Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 1-2-5 def. University of Texas Longhorns 3-4-6
2 Tulane University Green Wave 1-3-4 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 2-5-6
3 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-6 def. Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 3-4-5
4 University of Texas Longhorns 1-2-6 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 3-4-5
5 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-3 def. University of Texas Longhorns 4-5-6
6 Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 1-2-3 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 4-5-6
7 Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 1-2-3 def. University of Texas Longhorns 4-5-6
8 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-4 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 3-5-6
9 Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 2-3-4 DSQ def. Tulane University Green Wave 1-5-6 DSQ
10 Texas A&M University Aggies 1-2-6 def. University of Texas Longhorns 3-4-5
11 Tulane University Green Wave 1-3-4 def. University of Texas Longhorns 2-5-6
12 Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 1-2-3 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 4-5-6
13 Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 1-2-6 def. University of Texas Longhorns 3-4-5
14 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-3 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 4-5-6
15 Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 1-2-3 def. Tulane University Green Wave 4-5-6
16 University of Texas Longhorns 1-2-6 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 3-4-5
17 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-6 def. University of Texas Longhorns 3-4-5
18 Texas A&M University Aggies 1-3-6 def. Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 2-4-5

Conditions — 04/26/2014 (8am–6pm)

☁️Overcast
Humidity 67%  ·  Pressure 1008.3 hPa

Temperature

77°F
↑ 81°F   ↓ 69°F
Feels like 78°F

Wind

● from   ▲ toward
9.3 kn
avg  ·  max 10.4 kn
Gusts to 23.3 kn
From SSE (161°)

Sky & Precipitation

Cloud cover99% Sunshine2.4 hrs Humidity67% Pressure1008.3 hPa Rain0.02 in

What this breeze does at Texas — from fleet racing

Breeze: S about 11 kn (weather reanalysis in the scorer’s units)
In fleet races at Texas in this breeze: a favourites’ day (+0.08)
Favourites’ conditions: in fleet racing here the results follow the ratings more closely than usual, and the top seeds hold their places.

Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.08 means a rating gap counts about 7% more than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.

Orderliness beyond the fleet at Texas by wind direction (angle) and speed (rings), fitted surface; dots are labelled regatta-days, ★ this regatta (19 labelled fleet-race days at Texas).

From the notes

Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.

All notes →