SEISA Team Racing Championship 2015

# SchoolTeam Rec.
1 Texas A&M University at Galveston Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 6–1
2 Tulane University Tulane University Green Wave 5–2
3 University of Texas University of Texas Longhorns 2–5
4 Texas A&M University Texas A&M University Aggies 1–6

Pre-event forecast

Fitted on the 5,709 team race matches sailed before 2015-04-25, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 12 of 14 matches (86%) with a log-loss of 0.362 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went well for the forecast. Orderliness +0.08 ± 0.47: a typical event, more orderly than 51% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.

PlaceSchool Pred. Strength Boats (skipper / crew, boat value) Pred. win % Recordvs forecast
1Texas A&M University at Galveston
Aggies
15.85
school −0.23, home +0.26
Jacob Hafemeister / Megan Ferguson 1.80
Dylan Marohn / Mariana Perrigo 1.66
Michael Sager / Alex Kraemer 2.21
92%6–1 (86%)−0.4
2Tulane University
Green Wave
24.17
school −0.23
Nick Watts / Brennan Dorsey 1.78
Jessica Oswalt / Malcolm Kriegel 1.16
John Corrigan / Addison Adams
57%5–2 (71%)+1.0
3University of Texas
Longhorns
42.06
school −0.16
Ashlynd Epstein / Hunter Ledonne 0.23
Masie Comen / Thomas Settle 1.16
William Cragin / Brinley Kranz 0.71
23%2–5 (29%)+0.4
4Texas A&M University
Aggies
32.23
school −0.12
Erin Hawk / Christine Sicktich 1.10
Benjamin Lipari / Sarah Turner
Christopher Suarez / Alexander Tyska
27%1–6 (14%)−0.9

Surprisal: who beat their rating

Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.

PlaceSchoolStrength Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
2Tulane University4.175.395–24.0+1.210.927%
3University of Texas2.062.412–51.6+0.360.154%
1Texas A&M University at Galveston5.855.166–16.4−0.690.290%
4Texas A&M University2.231.201–61.9−1.030.693%

By skipper

SkipperSchoolValue Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
Nick WattsTulane University1.782.995–24.0+1.210.927%
Jessica OswaltTulane University1.162.375–24.0+1.210.927%
John CorriganTulane University1.122.345–24.0+1.210.927%
Ashlynd EpsteinUniversity of Texas0.230.592–51.6+0.360.154%
Masie ComenUniversity of Texas1.161.522–51.6+0.360.154%
William CraginUniversity of Texas0.711.072–51.6+0.360.154%
Jacob HafemeisterTexas A&M University at Galveston1.801.116–16.4−0.690.290%
Michael SagerTexas A&M University at Galveston2.211.526–16.4−0.690.290%
Erin HawkTexas A&M University1.100.071–61.9−1.030.693%
Benjamin LipariTexas A&M University0.75-0.281–61.9−1.030.693%

Match by match

Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).

Rd#WinnerLoser P(winner)
11Tulane UniversityTexas A&M University at Galveston13%upset
12University of TexasTexas A&M University52%
13Texas A&M University at GalvestonUniversity of Texas98%
14Tulane UniversityTexas A&M University88%
15Tulane UniversityUniversity of Texas89%
16Texas A&M University at GalvestonTexas A&M University97%
27Texas A&M University at GalvestonTulane University84%
28Texas A&M UniversityUniversity of Texas55%
29Tulane UniversityTexas A&M University87%
210Texas A&M University at GalvestonUniversity of Texas98%
211Texas A&M University at GalvestonTexas A&M University97%
212Tulane UniversityUniversity of Texas90%
213Texas A&M University at GalvestonTulane University83%
214University of TexasTexas A&M University42%upset

Round 1

TeamRec.AggiesWaveLonghornsAggies
Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies2–1✕LWW
Tulane University Green Wave3–0W✕WW
University of Texas Longhorns1–2LL✕W
Texas A&M University Aggies0–3LLL✕

Round 2

TeamRec.AggiesWaveLonghornsAggies
Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies4–0✕WWW
Tulane University Green Wave2–2L✕WW
University of Texas Longhorns1–3LL✕W
Texas A&M University Aggies1–3LLL✕
# Winner Loser Pos.
1 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-6 def. Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 3-4-5
2 University of Texas Longhorns 1-2-5 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 3-4-6
3 Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 1-2-3 def. University of Texas Longhorns 4-5-6
4 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-5 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 3-4-6
5 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-6 def. University of Texas Longhorns 3-4-5
6 Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 1-2-4 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 3-5-6
7 Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 1-2-5 def. Tulane University Green Wave 3-4-6
8 Texas A&M University Aggies 1-2-6 def. University of Texas Longhorns 3-4-5
9 Tulane University Green Wave 1-4-5 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 2-3-6
10 Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 1-2-4 def. University of Texas Longhorns 3-5-6
11 Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 1-2-3 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 4-5-6
12 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-6 def. University of Texas Longhorns 3-4-5
13 Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 1-2-6 def. Tulane University Green Wave 3-4-5
14 University of Texas Longhorns 1-3-5 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 2-4-6

Conditions — 04/25/2015 (8am–6pm)

☀️Clear sky
Humidity 89%  ·  Pressure 1008.2 hPa

Temperature

75°F
↑ 76°F   ↓ 73°F
Feels like 81°F

Wind

● from   ▲ toward
6.5 kn
avg  ·  max 12.5 kn
Gusts to 21.6 kn
From SSE (167°)

Sky & Precipitation

Cloud cover54% Sunshine7.0 hrs Humidity89% Pressure1008.2 hPa Rain0.69 in

What this breeze does at Texas A&M Galveston — from fleet racing

Breeze: S about 9 kn (weather reanalysis in the scorer’s units)
In fleet races at Texas A&M Galveston in this breeze: a favourites’ day (+0.09)
Favourites’ conditions: in fleet racing here the results follow the ratings more closely than usual, and the top seeds hold their places.

Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.09 means a rating gap counts about 8% more than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.

Orderliness beyond the fleet at Texas A&M Galveston by wind direction (angle) and speed (rings), fitted surface; dots are labelled regatta-days, ★ this regatta (29 labelled fleet-race days at Texas A&M Galveston).

From the notes

Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.

All notes →