Navigate

SAISA/MAISA

# SchoolTeam A B TOT
1 College of Charleston College of Charleston Cougars 1 48 38 86
2 Washington College Washington College Shoremen 42 53 95
3 College of Charleston College of Charleston Cougars 2 61 40 101
4 Clemson University Clemson University Tigers 74 53 127
5 Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Tech 61 71 132
6 Auburn University Auburn University Auburn 97 105 202
7 Emory University Emory University Emory 111 111 222
8 American University American University American 117 117 234
SchoolTeam R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 R10 R11 R12 R13 R14 R15 R16 TOT Sailors
Washington College Washington College Shoremen DNF 2 3 2 1 2 3 4 2 3 1 2 3 2 1 2 42 Mildred Conroy '12
Matt Lawler '13
College of Charleston College of Charleston Cougars 1 DNF 4 1 1 2 5 1 3 1 5 5 3 2 3 2 1 48 Christopher Banholzer '13
Coreyanna Moore '11
College of Charleston College of Charleston Cougars 2 DNF 3 6 3 6 3 2 5 4 2 3 1 4 1 5 4 61 Carly Shevitz '14
Jenny Powell '14
Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Tech DNF 6 4 4 3 4 5 1 3 1 2 5 1 5 3 5 61 Andrew Battigaglia '12
Elizabeth Rahn '15
Clemson University Clemson University Tigers DNF 1 5 6 5 1 4 2 5 6 4 4 5 4 7 6 74 Alexander Smolka '13
Emily Klug '14
Auburn University Auburn University Auburn DNF 5 7 5 8 6 6 7 6 4 6 7 6 6 6 3 97 Samuel Hodges '13
Wesley Wallace '14
Emory University Emory University Emory DNF BYE 2 8 7 8 7 6 8 8 7 8 7 8 4 7 111 Alexander Rodin '12
Meredith Whitten '14
American University American University American DNF 7 8 7 4 7 8 8 7 7 8 6 8 7 8 8 117 Bryan Schapperle '13
Kara Lang '11
SchoolTeam R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 R10 R11 R12 R13 R14 R15 R16 TOT Sailors
College of Charleston College of Charleston Cougars 1 5 3 2 1 1 3 2 3 3 4 2 2 4 1 1 1 38 Nicole Hause '14
Courtney Alexander '14
College of Charleston College of Charleston Cougars 2 4 6 1 2 2 1 4 1 2 1 1 3 3 3 2 4 40 Caroline Warren '12
Alicija Bulota '14
Clemson University Clemson University Tigers 2 5 4 3 3 6 1 4 4 2 3 4 1 4 5 2 53 Drew Lisicki '12
Michelle Herridge '13
Washington College Washington College Shoremen RAF 1 3 4 5 2 3 2 1 3 5 5 2 2 3 3 53 Hadley Burnham '14
Caroline Hill '11
Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Tech 3 2 6 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 1 5 5 6 6 71 Morgan O'Neil '13
Matthew Sheffield '13
Auburn University Auburn University Auburn 6 7 7 7 7 7 6 7 7 6 6 7 6 7 7 5 105 Robert Dye '11
Anna Sprague '14
Emory University Emory University Emory 7 8 8 DNF 8 8 7 6 6 7 7 6 7 6 4 7 111 Martin Krafft '12
Brent Morel '12
American University American University American 1 4 5 6 6 5 DNS DNS DNS DNS DNS DNS DNS DNS DNS DNS 117 Leigh Cramer '12
Adam Taube '14
Boat Speed Analyzer
SlowExpected boat effectFast
−0.150+0.15
Places per race a team should expect to gain or lose in this boat against what its sailors' ratings predict, from a model of this fleet fitted on every regatta sailed here since Fall 2009 (7 regattas). Shown at the 40% that holds up on regattas the model never saw; hover a sail for its value and uncertainty. Grey = boat not in the fit. How this is estimated.

Division A

Team1A2A3A4A5A6A7A8A9A10A11A12A13A14A15A16A
American UniversityAmerican University American1133557711335577
Auburn UniversityAuburn University Auburn2288664422886644
College of CharlestonCollege of Charleston Cougars 13355771133557711
College of CharlestonCollege of Charleston Cougars 24422886644228866
Clemson UniversityClemson University Tigers5577113355771133
Emory UniversityEmory University Emory6644228866442288
Georgia Institute of TechnologyGeorgia Institute of Technology Georgia Tech7711335577113355
Washington CollegeWashington College Shoremen8866442288664422

Division B

Team1B2B3B4B5B6B7B8B9B10B11B12B13B14B15B16B
American UniversityAmerican University American991010111112121313141415151616
Auburn UniversityAuburn University Auburn101011111212131314141515161699
College of CharlestonCollege of Charleston Cougars 1111112121313141415151616991010
College of CharlestonCollege of Charleston Cougars 2121213131414151516169910101111
Clemson UniversityClemson University Tigers131314141515161699101011111212
Emory UniversityEmory University Emory141415151616991010111112121313
Georgia Institute of TechnologyGeorgia Institute of Technology Georgia Tech151516169910101111121213131414
Washington CollegeWashington College Shoremen161699101011111212131314141515

Conditions — 11/06/2010 (8am–6pm)

☀️Clear sky
Humidity 54%  ·  Pressure 1021.2 hPa

Temperature

52°F
↑ 56°F   ↓ 44°F
Feels like 45°F

Wind

● from   ▲ toward
8.8 kn
avg  ·  max 10.5 kn
Gusts to 20.4 kn
From NNW (328°)

Sky & Precipitation

Cloud cover13% Sunshine10.0 hrs Humidity54% Pressure1021.2 hPa

Orderliness — underdogs or favourites?

Breeze: NW 11 kn* · N 10 kn (*weather reanalysis in the scorer’s units)
In this breeze at Charleston: an underdogs’ day (−0.05)
Expect upsets: lower-rated teams have a better chance of beating the seeds, and the fleet bunches up.
Fleet adjustment +0.09 (a softer or greener fleet makes the ratings stick) · combined forecast +0.04
Actual: about typical, within noise (+0.14 ± 0.12)

Orderliness is how tightly the finishing order followed the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0). Positive is the favourites’ day: the ratings carried more weight than usual and the top seeds finished where expected. Negative is the underdogs’ day: the fleet compressed and the favourites came back to the pack. A value of ±0.05 means a rating gap counts about 4% less than on a typical day.

The breeze reading is the chart’s value at this regatta’s wind direction and speed (the star): this venue’s pattern of which directions bring order and which bring upsets, with breeze generally orderly and light air surprising. The fleet adjustment comes from the entry list: the stronger and more experienced the fleet, the more surprising the racing. How this is estimated · compare venues.

Orderliness beyond the fleet at Charleston by wind direction (angle) and speed (rings), fitted surface; dots are labelled regatta-days, ★ this regatta (69 labelled days at Charleston).

From the notes

Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.

All notes →