| # | School | Team | A | B | TOT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  |
Miami University | Red Hawks | 9 | 4 | 13 |
| 2 |  |
University of Michigan | Wolverines | 8 | 10 | 18 |
| 3 |  |
Case Western Reserve University | CWRU Spartans | 11 | 22 | 33 |
| 4 |  |
Michigan State University | Spartans | 19 | 24 | 43 |
| 5 |  |
University of Toledo | Rockets | 23 | 28 | 51 |
| 6 |  |
Vikes | Vikes | 33 | 20 | 53 |
| 7 |  |
Ohio University | Bobcats | 35 | 29 | 64 |
| 8 |  |
Ohio State University | Buckeyes 2 | 36 MRP | 46 MRP | 82 MRP |
| 9 |  |
Hope College | Flying Dutchmen | 34 | 48 | 82 |
| 10 |  |
Saginaw Valley State University | Cardinals | 46 | 42 | 88 |
| 11 | |
Ohio State University | Buckeyes 1 | 52 MRP | 37 MRP | 89 MRP |
| Team | 1A | 2A | 3A | 4A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case Western Reserve University CWRU Spartans | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
| Vikes Vikes | 3 | 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Hope College Flying Dutchmen | 4 | 4 | 9 | 9 |
| Miami University Red Hawks | 7 | 7 | 12 | 12 |
| University of Michigan Wolverines | 21 | 21 | 1 | 1 |
| Michigan State University Spartans | 9 | 9 | 13 | 13 |
| Ohio University Bobcats | 17 | 17 | 21 | 21 |
| Ohio State University Buckeyes 1 | 12 | 12 | 17 | 17 |
| Ohio State University Buckeyes 2 | 13 | 13 | 20 | 20 |
| Saginaw Valley State University Cardinals | 20 | 20 | 22 | 22 |
| University of Toledo Rockets | 22 | 22 | 3 | 3 |
| Team | 1B | 2B | 3B | 4B | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case Western Reserve University CWRU Spartans | 3 | 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Vikes Vikes | 4 | 4 | 9 | 9 |
| Hope College Flying Dutchmen | 7 | 7 | 12 | 12 |
| Miami University Red Hawks | 9 | 9 | 13 | 13 |
| University of Michigan Wolverines | 22 | 22 | 3 | 3 |
| Michigan State University Spartans | 12 | 12 | 17 | 17 |
| Ohio University Bobcats | 20 | 20 | 22 | 22 |
| Ohio State University Buckeyes 1 | 13 | 13 | 20 | 20 |
| Ohio State University Buckeyes 2 | 17 | 17 | 21 | 21 |
| Saginaw Valley State University Cardinals | 21 | 21 | 1 | 1 |
| University of Toledo Rockets | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
Orderliness is how tightly the finishing order followed the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0). Positive is the favourites’ day: the ratings carried more weight than usual and the top seeds finished where expected. Negative is the underdogs’ day: the fleet compressed and the favourites came back to the pack. A value of ±0.26 means a rating gap counts about 23% less than on a typical day.
The breeze reading is the chart’s value at this regatta’s wind direction and speed (the star): this venue’s pattern of which directions bring order and which bring upsets, with breeze generally orderly and light air surprising. The fleet adjustment comes from the entry list: the stronger and more experienced the fleet, the more surprising the racing. How this is estimated · compare venues.
Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.
