SEISA Women's Team Race Championship

# SchoolTeam Rec.
1 Tulane University Tulane University Green Wave 3–0
2 University of Texas University of Texas Longhorns 0–3

Pre-event forecast

Fitted on the 18,258 team race matches sailed before 2022-04-09, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 3 of 3 matches (100%) with a log-loss of 0.002 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went well for the forecast. vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.

PlaceSchool Pred. Strength Boats (skipper / crew, boat value) Pred. win % Recordvs forecast
1Tulane University
Green Wave
19.12
home +0.36
Caroline Benson / Lydia Brown 2.97
Mia Hanes / Gillian Perrell 2.47
Ciara Rodriguez-Horan / Lucy Spearman 3.29
100%3–0 (100%)+0.0
2University of Texas
Longhorns
23.08Karina Bertelsmann / Leigha Forrest 1.69
Theresa Mccomiskey / Delilah D'Souza 1.23
Sophia Herrada / Taima Crean
0%0–3 (0%)−0.0

Surprisal: who beat their rating

Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.

PlaceSchoolStrength Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
1Tulane University9.1212.123–03.0≥+3.000.099%
2University of Texas3.080.080–30.0≤−3.000.0>99%

By skipper

SkipperSchoolValue Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
Mia HanesTulane University2.475.473–03.0≥+3.000.099%
Ciara Rodriguez-HoranTulane University3.296.293–03.0≥+3.000.099%
Karina BertelsmannUniversity of Texas1.69-1.310–30.0≤−3.000.0>99%
Theresa MccomiskeyUniversity of Texas1.23-1.770–30.0≤−3.000.0>99%
Sophia HerradaUniversity of Texas0.08-2.920–30.0≤−3.000.0>99%

Match by match

Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).

Rd#WinnerLoser P(winner)
11Tulane UniversityUniversity of Texas100%
22Tulane UniversityUniversity of Texas100%
33Tulane UniversityUniversity of Texas100%

Round 1

TeamRec.WaveLonghorns
Tulane University Green Wave1–0✕W
University of Texas Longhorns0–1L✕

Round 2

TeamRec.WaveLonghorns
Tulane University Green Wave1–0✕W
University of Texas Longhorns0–1L✕

Round 3

TeamRec.WaveLonghorns
Tulane University Green Wave1–0✕W
University of Texas Longhorns0–1L✕
# Winner Loser Pos.
1 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-3 def. University of Texas Longhorns 4-5-6
2 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-3 def. University of Texas Longhorns 4-5-6
3 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-4 def. University of Texas Longhorns 3-5-6

Conditions — 04/09/2022 (8am–6pm)

☀️Clear sky
Humidity 38%  ·  Pressure 1021.0 hPa

Temperature

65°F
↑ 71°F   ↓ 52°F
Feels like 61°F

Wind

● from   ▲ toward
5.8 kn
avg  ·  max 8.7 kn
Gusts to 18.1 kn
From W (275°)

Sky & Precipitation

Cloud cover0% Sunshine11.0 hrs Humidity38% Pressure1021.0 hPa

What this breeze does at Tulane — from fleet racing

Breeze: W about 8 kn (weather reanalysis in the scorer’s units)
In fleet races at Tulane in this breeze: a favourites’ day (+0.09)
Favourites’ conditions: in fleet racing here the results follow the ratings more closely than usual, and the top seeds hold their places.

Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.09 means a rating gap counts about 8% more than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.

Orderliness beyond the fleet at Tulane by wind direction (angle) and speed (rings), fitted surface; dots are labelled regatta-days, ★ this regatta (38 labelled fleet-race days at Tulane).

From the notes

Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.

All notes →