SEISA Women's Team Race Conference Championship

# SchoolTeam Rec.
1 Tulane University Tulane University Green Wave 6–0
2 Texas A&M University Texas A&M University Aggies 0–6

Pre-event forecast

Fitted on the 30,294 team race matches sailed before 2026-04-02, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 6 of 6 matches (100%) with a log-loss of 0.003 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went well for the forecast. vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.

PlaceSchool Pred. Strength Boats (skipper / crew, boat value) Pred. win % Recordvs forecast
1Tulane University
Green Wave
18.87
school +0.08, home +0.34
Oakley Cunningham / Hope Breslin 2.63
Lola Kohl / Martha Hughes 2.37
Ava Anderson / Catherine Anderson 3.43
100%6–0 (100%)+0.0
2Texas A&M University
Aggies
23.17
school −0.09
Kate Hennig / Elisabeth Ritenour 0.98
Sofia Pando / Menya Bird 1.07
Sydney Krahulik / Evelyn Dubois 1.18
0%0–6 (0%)−0.0

Surprisal: who beat their rating

Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.

PlaceSchoolStrength Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
1Tulane University8.8711.876–06.0≥+3.000.098%
2Texas A&M University3.170.170–60.0≤−3.000.0>99%

By skipper

SkipperSchoolValue Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
Oakley CunninghamTulane University2.635.636–06.0≥+3.000.098%
Lola KohlTulane University2.375.376–06.0≥+3.000.098%
Ava AndersonTulane University3.436.436–06.0≥+3.000.098%
Kate HennigTexas A&M University0.98-2.020–60.0≤−3.000.0>99%
Sofia PandoTexas A&M University1.07-1.930–60.0≤−3.000.0>99%
Sydney KrahulikTexas A&M University1.18-1.820–60.0≤−3.000.0>99%

Match by match

Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).

Rd#WinnerLoser P(winner)
11Tulane UniversityTexas A&M University100%
22Tulane UniversityTexas A&M University100%
33Tulane UniversityTexas A&M University100%
44Tulane UniversityTexas A&M University100%
55Tulane UniversityTexas A&M University100%
66Tulane UniversityTexas A&M University100%

Round 1

TeamRec.WaveAggies
Tulane University Green Wave1–0✕W
Texas A&M University Aggies0–1L✕

Round 2

TeamRec.WaveAggies
Tulane University Green Wave1–0✕W
Texas A&M University Aggies0–1L✕

Round 3

TeamRec.WaveAggies
Tulane University Green Wave1–0✕W
Texas A&M University Aggies0–1L✕

Round 4

TeamRec.WaveAggies
Tulane University Green Wave1–0✕W
Texas A&M University Aggies0–1L✕

Round 5

TeamRec.WaveAggies
Tulane University Green Wave1–0✕W
Texas A&M University Aggies0–1L✕

Round 6

TeamRec.WaveAggies
Tulane University Green Wave1–0✕W
Texas A&M University Aggies0–1L✕
# Winner Loser Pos.
1 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-3 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 4-5-6
2 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-3 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 4-5-6
3 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-3 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 4-5-6
4 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-3 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 4-5-6
5 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-3 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 4-5-6
6 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-3 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 4-5-6

Conditions — 04/02/2026 (8am–6pm)

☁️Overcast
Humidity 67%  ·  Pressure 1018.2 hPa

Temperature

78°F
↑ 82°F   ↓ 71°F
Feels like 81°F

Wind

● from   ▲ toward
7.9 kn
avg  ·  max 9.7 kn
Gusts to 23.1 kn
From SSE (153°)

Sky & Precipitation

Cloud cover86% Sunshine10.2 hrs Humidity67% Pressure1018.2 hPa Rain0.05 in

What this breeze does at Tulane — from fleet racing

Breeze: SE about 10 kn (weather reanalysis in the scorer’s units)
In fleet races at Tulane in this breeze: a favourites’ day (+0.06)
Favourites’ conditions: in fleet racing here the results follow the ratings more closely than usual, and the top seeds hold their places.

Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.06 means a rating gap counts about 5% more than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.

Orderliness beyond the fleet at Tulane by wind direction (angle) and speed (rings), fitted surface; dots are labelled regatta-days, ★ this regatta (38 labelled fleet-race days at Tulane).

From the notes

Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.

All notes →