| # | School | Team | A | B | TOT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Duke University | Blue Devils | 20 | 8 | 28 | |
| 2 | Georgia Institute of Technology | Yellow Jackets | 24 | 12 | 36 | |
| 3 | Citadel | Citadel | 20 | 29 | 49 | |
| 4 | North Carolina State University | Wolfpack | 24 | 28 | 52 | |
| 5 | University of Tennessee | Volunteers | 35 | 21 | 56 | |
| 6 | Vanderbilt | Vanderbilt | 36 | 20 | 56 | |
| 7 | Clemson University | Tigers | 23 | 34 | 57 | |
| 8 | Davidson College | Wildcats | 21 | 48 | 69 | |
| 9 | University of South Carolina | Coed | 29 | 44 | 73 | |
| 10 | Auburn University | Tigers | 46 | 40 | 86 | |
| 11 | University of Georgia | Bulldogs | 53 | 46 | 99 |
| Team | 1A | 2A | 3A | 4A | 5A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Auburn University Tigers | 11 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Citadel Citadel | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 7 | |
| Clemson University Tigers | 10 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 1 | |
| Davidson College Wildcats | 9 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 11 | |
| Duke University Blue Devils | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 10 | |
| University of Georgia Bulldogs | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | |
| Georgia Institute of Technology Yellow Jackets | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | |
| North Carolina State University Wolfpack | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 8 | |
| University of South Carolina Coed | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | |
| University of Tennessee Volunteers | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | |
| Vanderbilt Vanderbilt | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| Team | 1B | 2B | 3B | 4B | 5B | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Auburn University Tigers | 11 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Citadel Citadel | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 7 | |
| Clemson University Tigers | 10 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 1 | |
| Davidson College Wildcats | 9 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 11 | |
| Duke University Blue Devils | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 10 | |
| University of Georgia Bulldogs | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | |
| Georgia Institute of Technology Yellow Jackets | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | |
| North Carolina State University Wolfpack | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 8 | |
| University of South Carolina Coed | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | |
| University of Tennessee Volunteers | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | |
| Vanderbilt Vanderbilt | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
Orderliness is how tightly the finishing order followed the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0). Positive is the favourites’ day: the ratings carried more weight than usual and the top seeds finished where expected. Negative is the underdogs’ day: the fleet compressed and the favourites came back to the pack. A value of ±0.01 means a rating gap counts about 1% less than on a typical day.
The breeze reading is the chart’s value at this regatta’s wind direction and speed (the star): this venue’s pattern of which directions bring order and which bring upsets, with breeze generally orderly and light air surprising. The fleet adjustment comes from the entry list: the stronger and more experienced the fleet, the more surprising the racing. How this is estimated · compare venues.
Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.