SEISA Team Race Championship

# SchoolTeam Rec.
1 Tulane University Tulane University Green Wave 9–0
2 University of Texas University of Texas Longhorns 6–3
3 Texas A&M University at Galveston Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 3–6
4 Loyola University New Orleans Loyola University New Orleans Wolfpack 0–9

Pre-event forecast

Fitted on the 15,606 team race matches sailed before 2021-04-24, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 18 of 18 matches (100%) with a log-loss of 0.038 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went well for the forecast. Orderliness +0.38 ± 0.45: a typical event, more orderly than 83% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.

PlaceSchool Pred. Strength Boats (skipper / crew, boat value) Pred. win % Recordvs forecast
1Tulane University
Green Wave
18.34
school −0.09
William Keenan / Andrea Riefkohl Gonzalez 2.60
Cameron Giblin / Lydia Brown 3.48
Caelan Watts / Gillian Perrell 2.32
100%9–0 (100%)+0.0
2University of Texas
Longhorns
23.92
school −0.10, home +0.36
Ethan Froelich / John Mason
Frederik Winguth / Warren Wegener 0.81
Karina Bertelsmann / Lillian Andersen 1.05
63%6–3 (67%)+0.3
3Texas A&M University at Galveston
Aggies
31.79
school −0.16
Jonathan Sager / Lorin Dollar 1.95
Brandon Foster / Gunnar Pierson
Wes Sholders / Kayla Costigan 0–6
Wes Sholders / Jacob Carcasi 3–0
34%3–6 (33%)−0.0
4Loyola University New Orleans
Wolfpack
4-0.52
school −0.32
Matthew Mastin / Giovanna Pastrone
Sydney Rockwell / Leila Avery
Natalie Kulka / Phillip Lopez -0.78
3%0–9 (0%)−0.3

Surprisal: who beat their rating

Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.

PlaceSchoolStrength Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
1Tulane University8.3411.349–09.0≥+3.000.196%
2University of Texas3.925.086–35.7+1.160.271%
3Texas A&M University at Galveston1.791.713–63.0−0.080.082%
4Loyola University New Orleans-0.52-3.520–90.3≤−3.000.4>99%

By skipper

SkipperSchoolValue Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
William KeenanTulane University2.605.609–09.0≥+3.000.196%
Caelan WattsTulane University2.325.329–09.0≥+3.000.196%
Frederik WinguthUniversity of Texas0.811.976–35.7+1.160.271%
Karina BertelsmannUniversity of Texas1.052.216–35.7+1.160.271%
Jonathan SagerTexas A&M University at Galveston1.951.873–63.0−0.080.082%
Brandon FosterTexas A&M University at Galveston-0.43-0.513–63.0−0.080.082%
Wes SholdersTexas A&M University at Galveston0.05-0.033–63.0−0.080.082%
Matthew MastinLoyola University New Orleans0.92-2.080–90.3≤−3.000.4>99%
Sydney RockwellLoyola University New Orleans-0.68-3.680–90.3≤−3.000.4>99%
Natalie KulkaLoyola University New Orleans-0.78-3.770–90.3≤−3.000.4>99%

Match by match

Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).

Rd#WinnerLoser P(winner)
11Tulane UniversityLoyola University New Orleans100%
12University of TexasTexas A&M University at Galveston91%
13Tulane UniversityTexas A&M University at Galveston100%
14University of TexasLoyola University New Orleans99%
15Texas A&M University at GalvestonLoyola University New Orleans91%
16Tulane UniversityUniversity of Texas99%
27Tulane UniversityLoyola University New Orleans100%
28University of TexasTexas A&M University at Galveston89%
29Tulane UniversityTexas A&M University at Galveston100%
210University of TexasLoyola University New Orleans99%
211Texas A&M University at GalvestonLoyola University New Orleans91%
212Tulane UniversityUniversity of Texas99%
313Tulane UniversityLoyola University New Orleans100%
314University of TexasTexas A&M University at Galveston89%
315Tulane UniversityTexas A&M University at Galveston100%
316University of TexasLoyola University New Orleans99%
317Texas A&M University at GalvestonLoyola University New Orleans91%
318Tulane UniversityUniversity of Texas99%

Round 1

TeamRec.WaveLonghornsAggiesWolfpack
Tulane University Green Wave3–0✕WWW
University of Texas Longhorns2–1L✕WW
Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies1–2LL✕W
Loyola University New Orleans Wolfpack0–3LLL✕

Round 2

TeamRec.WaveLonghornsAggiesWolfpack
Tulane University Green Wave3–0✕WWW
University of Texas Longhorns2–1L✕WW
Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies1–2LL✕W
Loyola University New Orleans Wolfpack0–3LLL✕

Round 3

TeamRec.WaveLonghornsAggiesWolfpack
Tulane University Green Wave3–0✕WWW
University of Texas Longhorns2–1L✕WW
Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies1–2LL✕W
Loyola University New Orleans Wolfpack0–3LLL✕
# Winner Loser Pos.
1 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-3 def. Loyola University New Orleans Wolfpack 4-5-6
2 University of Texas Longhorns 1-2-3 def. Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 4-5-6
3 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-3 def. Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 4-5-6
4 University of Texas Longhorns 1-2-3 def. Loyola University New Orleans Wolfpack 4-5-6
5 Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 1-2-5 def. Loyola University New Orleans Wolfpack 3-4-6
6 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-3 def. University of Texas Longhorns 4-5-6
7 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-3 def. Loyola University New Orleans Wolfpack 4-5-6
8 University of Texas Longhorns 1-2-3 def. Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 4-5-6
9 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-3 def. Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 4-5-6
10 University of Texas Longhorns 1-2-3 def. Loyola University New Orleans Wolfpack 4-5-6
11 Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 1-2-5 def. Loyola University New Orleans Wolfpack 3-4-6
12 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-3 def. University of Texas Longhorns 4-5-6
13 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-3 def. Loyola University New Orleans Wolfpack 4-5-6
14 University of Texas Longhorns 1-2-4 def. Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 3-5-6
15 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-3 def. Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 4-5-6
16 University of Texas Longhorns 1-2-3 def. Loyola University New Orleans Wolfpack 4-5-6
17 Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 1-2-4 def. Loyola University New Orleans Wolfpack 3-5-6
18 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-5 def. University of Texas Longhorns 3-4-6

Conditions — 04/24/2021 (8am–6pm)

☀️Clear sky
Humidity 48%  ·  Pressure 1012.2 hPa

Temperature

75°F
↑ 80°F   ↓ 62°F
Feels like 72°F

Wind

● from   ▲ toward
11.7 kn
avg  ·  max 12.8 kn
Gusts to 22.5 kn
From NNW (343°)

Sky & Precipitation

Cloud cover0% Sunshine11.0 hrs Humidity48% Pressure1012.2 hPa

What this breeze does at Texas — from fleet racing

Breeze: N about 13 kn (weather reanalysis in the scorer’s units)
In fleet races at Texas in this breeze: a favourites’ day (+0.08)
Favourites’ conditions: in fleet racing here the results follow the ratings more closely than usual, and the top seeds hold their places.

Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.08 means a rating gap counts about 7% more than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.

Orderliness beyond the fleet at Texas by wind direction (angle) and speed (rings), fitted surface; dots are labelled regatta-days, ★ this regatta (19 labelled fleet-race days at Texas).

From the notes

Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.

All notes →