Q1 Regatta

# SchoolTeam Rec.
1 Texas A&M University Texas A&M University Aggies 1 3–0
2 Rice University Rice University Owls 2–1
3 University of Texas University of Texas Longhorns 1–2
4 Texas A&M University Texas A&M University Aggies 2 0–3

Pre-event forecast

Fitted on the 28,104 team race matches sailed before 2026-01-31, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 6 of 6 matches (100%) with a log-loss of 0.271 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went well for the forecast. vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.

PlaceSchool Pred. Strength Boats (skipper / crew, boat value) Pred. win % Recordvs forecast
1Texas A&M University
Aggies 1
13.96Kate Hennig / Evelyn Dubois 1.07
Sofia Pando / Menya Bird
Korbin Bendele / Sydney Krahulik
76%3–0 (100%)+0.7
2Rice University
Owls
23.59
school −0.30
Joe Slipper / Leo Marek 1.74
Adeline Thompson / Lindsey Frost
Lewis Forrest / Naayaa Mehta
67%2–1 (67%)−0.0
3University of Texas
Longhorns
32.71
school −0.17, home +0.36
Elizabeth Cleaves / Mark Carella
Logan Downey / Luka Vukmirica
Dennis Kostjuhin / Reema Nannapaneni
42%1–2 (33%)−0.3
4Texas A&M University
Aggies 2
41.55Zachary Aronson / Charlotte Heaney 0.21
Canaan Cortes / Elisabeth Ritenour
Jack Riley / Jeffrey Souto
15%0–3 (0%)−0.4

Surprisal: who beat their rating

Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.

PlaceSchoolStrength Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
1Texas A&M University Aggies 13.966.963–02.3≥+3.001.242%
2Rice University Owls3.593.572–12.0−0.020.077%
3University of Texas Longhorns2.712.201–21.3−0.510.187%
4Texas A&M University Aggies 21.55-1.450–30.4≤−3.000.7>99%

By skipper

SkipperSchoolValue Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
Kate HennigTexas A&M University1.074.073–02.3≥+3.001.242%
Sofia PandoTexas A&M University0.923.923–02.3≥+3.001.242%
Korbin BendeleTexas A&M University1.964.963–02.3≥+3.001.242%
Joe SlipperRice University1.741.722–12.0−0.020.077%
Adeline ThompsonRice University1.381.362–12.0−0.020.077%
Lewis ForrestRice University0.690.672–12.0−0.020.077%
Elizabeth CleavesUniversity of Texas0.550.041–21.3−0.510.187%
Logan DowneyUniversity of Texas1.280.771–21.3−0.510.187%
Dennis KostjuhinUniversity of Texas0.610.101–21.3−0.510.187%
Zachary AronsonTexas A&M University0.21-2.790–30.4≤−3.000.7>99%
Canaan CortesTexas A&M University-0.48-3.480–30.4≤−3.000.7>99%
Jack RileyTexas A&M University1.75-1.250–30.4≤−3.000.7>99%

Match by match

Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).

Rd#WinnerLoser P(winner)
11Texas A&M University Aggies 1Texas A&M University Aggies 292%
12Rice University OwlsUniversity of Texas Longhorns71%
13Texas A&M University Aggies 1University of Texas Longhorns78%
14Rice University OwlsTexas A&M University Aggies 288%
15University of Texas LonghornsTexas A&M University Aggies 276%
16Texas A&M University Aggies 1Rice University Owls58%

Round 1

TeamRec.1OwlsLonghorns2
Texas A&M University Aggies 13–3✕WL✕
Rice University Owls2–1L✕WL
University of Texas Longhorns1–2WL✕W
Texas A&M University Aggies 23–3✕WL✕
# Winner Loser Pos.
1 Texas A&M University Aggies 1 1-2-6 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 2 3-4-5
2 Rice University Owls 1-2-5 def. University of Texas Longhorns 3-4-6
3 Texas A&M University Aggies 1 2-3-4 def. University of Texas Longhorns 1-5-6
4 Rice University Owls 1-2-5 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 2 3-4-6
5 University of Texas Longhorns 1-2-6 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 2 3-4-5
6 Texas A&M University Aggies 1 1-2-6 def. Rice University Owls 3-4-5

Conditions — 01/31/2026 (8am–6pm)

☀️Clear sky
Humidity 53%  ·  Pressure 1036.3 hPa

Temperature

38°F
↑ 43°F   ↓ 32°F
Feels like 29°F

Wind

● from   ▲ toward
8.3 kn
avg  ·  max 9.9 kn
Gusts to 21.6 kn
From NNE (20°)

Sky & Precipitation

Cloud cover3% Sunshine9.4 hrs Humidity53% Pressure1036.3 hPa

What this breeze does at Texas — from fleet racing

Breeze: N about 10 kn (weather reanalysis in the scorer’s units)
In fleet races at Texas in this breeze: a favourites’ day (+0.09)
Favourites’ conditions: in fleet racing here the results follow the ratings more closely than usual, and the top seeds hold their places.

Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.09 means a rating gap counts about 8% more than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.

Orderliness beyond the fleet at Texas by wind direction (angle) and speed (rings), fitted surface; dots are labelled regatta-days, ★ this regatta (19 labelled fleet-race days at Texas).

From the notes

Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.

All notes →