Tyrell Trophy

# SchoolTeam A B TOT
1 Tufts University Tufts University Jumbos 13 9 22
2 Brandeis University Brandeis University Judges 23 43 66
3 Northeastern University Northeastern University Huskies 25 43 68
4 Massachusetts Maritime Academy Massachusetts Maritime Academy Buccaneers 33 36 69
5 Williams College Williams College Ephs 34 45 79
6 Mitchell College Mitchell College Mariners 52 33 85
7 University of Connecticut University of Connecticut Huskies 46 44 90
8 Wesleyan University Wesleyan University Cardinals 62 35 97
SchoolTeam R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 TOT Sailors
Tufts University Tufts University Jumbos 1 2 4 1 1 2 1 1 13 Solomon Krevans '14
Eliza White '14
Brandeis University Brandeis University Judges 3 6 1 3 3 1 4 2 23 Jacob Hardy '13
Hannah Spiro '15
Northeastern University Northeastern University Huskies 2 3 2 4 4 4 3 3 25 Zach Shapiro '15
Lukas Scott '16
Massachusetts Maritime Academy Massachusetts Maritime Academy Buccaneers 5 1 5 5 5 5 2 5 33 Sean Mclaughlin '15
Camille Aiello '15
Williams College Williams College Ephs 8 5 3 2 2 3 7 4 34 Timothy Lorenzen '12
Rachael Burns '15
University of Connecticut University of Connecticut Huskies 4 4 6 7 7 7 5 6 46 Shannan Smith '15 [1-4]
Lyndsay Stockwell '14 [5-8]
Mitchell College Mitchell College Mariners 7 7 7 6 6 6 6 7 52 Brendan Griffiths '14 [1-8]
Alexandra Bollella '14 [1-4]
Jared Lafosse-Baker '14 [5-8]
Wesleyan University Wesleyan University Cardinals 6 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 62 William Iselin '14
SchoolTeam R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 TOT Sailors
Tufts University Tufts University Jumbos 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 9 Cameron Barclift '14
Mara Rettig '15
Mitchell College Mitchell College Mariners 4 3 6 5 8 4 2 1 33 Alex Hering '13
Chelsea Abbenante '14
Wesleyan University Wesleyan University Cardinals 7 2 2 4 3 8 5 4 35 Justine Mitchell '15
Frances Williams '14
Massachusetts Maritime Academy Massachusetts Maritime Academy Buccaneers 5 8 4 2 2 6 3 6 36 Priscilla Stoll '15
Marshall Bailey '15
Brandeis University Brandeis University Judges 2 6 3 7 4 5 8 8 43 Davida Judelson '12
Katherine Kolios '12
Northeastern University Northeastern University Huskies 3 4 5 3 7 7 7 7 43 Olin Nelson '13
University of Connecticut University of Connecticut Huskies 8 7 7 6 5 2 6 3 44 Katelyn Guerrera '12 [1-2]
William Kresic '13 [3-8]
Catherine Stavola '14 [1-2]
Williams College Williams College Ephs 6 5 8 8 6 3 4 5 45 Joshua Revkin '13
Wen Han '13

Conditions — 04/01/2012 (8am–6pm)

☁️Overcast
Humidity 68%  ·  Pressure 1009.1 hPa

Temperature

47°F
↑ 50°F   ↓ 38°F
Feels like 41°F

Wind

● from   ▲ toward
5.0 kn
avg  ·  max 8.1 kn
Gusts to 19.0 kn
From SW (228°)

Sky & Precipitation

Cloud cover79% Sunshine8.8 hrs Humidity68% Pressure1009.1 hPa Rain0.08 in

Orderliness — underdogs or favourites?

Breeze: S 10 kn (scorer’s report)
In this breeze at U. Connecticut: a typical day (−0.01)
Nothing in the breeze favours either side; expect results to follow the ratings about as usual.
Fleet adjustment +0.11 (a softer or greener fleet makes the ratings stick) · combined forecast +0.10
Actual: about typical, within noise (+0.16 ± 0.17)

Orderliness is how tightly the finishing order followed the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0). Positive is the favourites’ day: the ratings carried more weight than usual and the top seeds finished where expected. Negative is the underdogs’ day: the fleet compressed and the favourites came back to the pack. A value of ±0.01 means a rating gap counts about 1% less than on a typical day.

The breeze reading is the chart’s value at this regatta’s wind direction and speed (the star): this venue’s pattern of which directions bring order and which bring upsets, with breeze generally orderly and light air surprising. The fleet adjustment comes from the entry list: the stronger and more experienced the fleet, the more surprising the racing. How this is estimated · compare venues.

Orderliness beyond the fleet at U. Connecticut by wind direction (angle) and speed (rings), fitted surface; dots are labelled regatta-days, ★ this regatta (only 7 labelled days at U. Connecticut, so the surface is mostly the all-venue pattern).

From the notes

Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.

All notes →