| # | School | Team | A | TOT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tufts University | Jumbo | 14 | 14 | |
| 2 | Tufts University | Jumbos | 14 | 14 | |
| 3 | Tufts University | Tufts University | 15 | 15 | |
| 4 | Boston University | Terriers | 17 | 17 | |
| 5 | Brandeis University | Judges 1 | 18 | 18 | |
| 6 | University of New Hampshire | Wildkittens | 30 | 30 | |
| 7 | Wellesley College | Blue | 30 | 30 | |
| 8 | Tufts University | Jumbalaya | 32 | 32 | |
| 9 | University of New Hampshire | Wildcats | 36 | 36 | |
| 10 | Brandeis University | Judges 2 | 37 | 37 | |
| 11 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Engineers 3 | 43 | 43 | |
| 12 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Engineers 2 | 46 | 46 | |
| 13 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Engineers 1 | 49 | 49 | |
| 14 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Beavers | 49 | 49 | |
| 15 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Engineers 4 | 56 | 56 | |
| 16 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Angry Beavers | 60 | 60 |
| Team | 1A | 2A | 3A | 4A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boston University Terriers | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | |
| Brandeis University Judges 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | |
| Brandeis University Judges 2 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Angry Beavers | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Beavers | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 2 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |
| University of New Hampshire Wildcats | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| University of New Hampshire Wildkittens | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Tufts University Jumbalaya | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | |
| Tufts University Jumbo | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | |
| Tufts University Tufts University | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | |
| Wellesley College Blue | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Orderliness is how tightly the finishing order followed the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0). Positive is the favourites’ day: the ratings carried more weight than usual and the top seeds finished where expected. Negative is the underdogs’ day: the fleet compressed and the favourites came back to the pack. A value of ±0.06 means a rating gap counts about 5% less than on a typical day.
The breeze reading is the chart’s value at this regatta’s wind direction and speed (the star): this venue’s pattern of which directions bring order and which bring upsets, with breeze generally orderly and light air surprising. The fleet adjustment comes from the entry list: the stronger and more experienced the fleet, the more surprising the racing. How this is estimated · compare venues.
Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.