| # | School | Team | A | B | TOT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | College of Charleston | Cougars | 11 | 15 | 26 | |
| 2 | The Citadel | Bulldogs | 9 | 18 | 27 | |
| 3 | University of South Carolina | Gamecocks 1 | 18 | 12 | 30 | |
| 4 | Duke University | Blue Devils | 16 | 22 | 38 | |
| 5 | North Carolina State University | Wolfpack | 26 | 17 | 43 | |
| 6 | Georgia Institute of Technology | Yellow Jackets | 26 | 27 | 53 | |
| 7 | University of South Carolina | Gamecocks 2 | 43 | 34 | 77 | |
| 8 | University of North Carolina at Wilmington | Seahawks | 43 | 37 | 80 | |
| 9 | Auburn University | Tigers | 42 | 44 | 86 | |
| 10 | University of Georgia | Bulldogs | 41 | 49 | 90 |
| School | Team | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 | TOT | Sailors | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Citadel | Bulldogs | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 | Gregory Walters '24 Kingsland Bland '23 |
|
| College of Charleston | Cougars | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 11 | Charles Mckenzie '25 Grace Beard '25 |
|
| Duke University | Blue Devils | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 16 | Carolina Cassedy '22 Ian Hoogenboom '25 |
|
| University of South Carolina | Gamecocks 1 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 18 | Ian Street '23 Anna Soykan '25 |
|
| North Carolina State University | Wolfpack | 4 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 26 | Harrison Bailey '23 Lulu Holtz '24 |
|
| Georgia Institute of Technology | Yellow Jackets | 6 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 26 | Cole Woerner '22 Kaitlyn Bagnoni '25 |
|
| University of Georgia | Bulldogs | 7 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 41 | Samuel Trimble '24 Benjamin Weatherly '25 |
|
| Auburn University | Tigers | 8 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 42 | Sara Boyd '22 [1-5] Michael Schaaf '23 [1-3] Gabriel Fontanella '24 [4-5] |
|
| University of North Carolina at Wilmington | Seahawks | 9 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 43 | Nevin Williams '24 Torin Stremlau '25 |
|
| University of South Carolina | Gamecocks 2 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 6 | 7 | 43 | Thomas Gallant '25 Ellie Dubose '25 |
| Team | 1A | 2A | 3A | 4A | 5A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Auburn University Tigers | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | |
| College of Charleston Cougars | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | |
| The Citadel Bulldogs | 6 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 | |
| Duke University Blue Devils | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | |
| University of Georgia Bulldogs | 7 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 9 | |
| Georgia Institute of Technology Yellow Jackets | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 | |
| North Carolina State University Wolfpack | 5 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 7 | |
| University of South Carolina Gamecocks 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 1 | |
| University of South Carolina Gamecocks 2 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 2 | |
| University of North Carolina at Wilmington Seahawks | 8 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 10 |
| Team | 1B | 2B | 3B | 4B | 5B | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Auburn University Tigers | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | |
| College of Charleston Cougars | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | |
| The Citadel Bulldogs | 7 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 9 | |
| Duke University Blue Devils | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 | |
| University of Georgia Bulldogs | 8 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 10 | |
| Georgia Institute of Technology Yellow Jackets | 5 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 7 | |
| North Carolina State University Wolfpack | 6 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 | |
| University of South Carolina Gamecocks 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 2 | |
| University of South Carolina Gamecocks 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | |
| University of North Carolina at Wilmington Seahawks | 9 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 1 |
Orderliness is how tightly the finishing order followed the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0). Positive is the favourites’ day: the ratings carried more weight than usual and the top seeds finished where expected. Negative is the underdogs’ day: the fleet compressed and the favourites came back to the pack. A value of ±0.04 means a rating gap counts about 3% less than on a typical day.
The breeze reading is the chart’s value at this regatta’s wind direction and speed (the star): this venue’s pattern of which directions bring order and which bring upsets, with breeze generally orderly and light air surprising. The fleet adjustment comes from the entry list: the stronger and more experienced the fleet, the more surprising the racing. How this is estimated · compare venues.
Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.