Georgetown Team Race

# SchoolTeam Rec.
1 Georgetown University Georgetown University Hoyas 3–1
2 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen 3–1
3 University of Pennsylvania University of Pennsylvania Quakers 2–2
4 Fordham University Fordham University Rams 2–2
5 Cornell University Cornell University Big Red 0–4

Pre-event forecast

Fitted on the 19,057 team race matches sailed before 2023-03-04, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 7 of 12 matches (58%) with a log-loss of 0.723 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went poorly for the forecast. Orderliness −0.76 ± 0.53: an upset-heavy event, more orderly than 5% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.

PlaceSchool Pred. Strength Boats (skipper / crew, boat value) Pred. win % Recordvs forecast
1Georgetown University
Hoyas
29.90
school +0.28
Edward Cook / Audrey Fung 2.94 2–1
Mariner Fagan / Diego Escobar 3.45 2–1
Mariner Fagan / Emily Panarella 3.40 2–0
Scott Mais / Addi Harris 3.29 2–0
Edward Cook / Xavier Stoldt 2.94 2–0
Mateo Di Blasi / Spencer Kriegstein 3.19 2–0
Scott Mais / Spencer Kriegstein 3.22 0–1
78%4–1 (80%)+0.1
2Hobart and William Smith Colleges
Statesmen
48.05
school +0.06
Juan Carlos Lacerda Jones / Richard Gleason 2–2
Will Murray / Anna Mcbride 2.97 2–2
Nicholas Sessions / Tess Weber 2–2
Juan Carlos Lacerda Jones / Rachel Duggan 1–0
Will Murray / Tess Weber 2.98 1–0
Nicholas Sessions / Frances Depke 1–0
29%3–2 (60%)+1.5
3University of Pennsylvania
Quakers
19.85
school +0.29
Christopher Sharpless / Eva Gonzalez-Whitehouse 2.85
Javier Garcon / Joshua Zeelander 3.06
Jordan Bruce / Shaanti Choi-Bose 3.64
78%3–2 (60%)−0.9
4Fordham University
Rams
57.65
school +0.16
Kenneth Corsig / Kristen Healy 2.73
Peter Lobaugh / Bella Rabeni 2.30
Patrick Dolan / Lauren Miller 2.44 1–2
Patrick Dolan / Beckett Kumler 2.45 1–1
19%2–3 (40%)+1.0
5Cornell University
Big Red
38.52
school −0.13
Bridget Green / Gabbi Delbello 3.25 0–3
Meredith Moran / Amelia Neumann 2.57 0–2
Lauren Ehnot / Amelia Neumann 2.50 0–2
Hayden Earl / Sophia Mulvania 0–1
Hayden Earl / Lucija Ruzevic 0–1
Meredith Moran / Lucija Ruzevic 2.62 0–1
Bridget Green / Lucija Ruzevic 3.17 0–1
Hayden Earl / Gabbi Delbello 0–1
43%0–4 (0%)−1.7

Surprisal: who beat their rating

Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.

PlaceSchoolStrength Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
2Hobart and William Smith Colleges8.059.623–21.5+1.571.813%
4Fordham University7.658.822–31.0+1.170.924%
1Georgetown University9.9010.004–13.9+0.110.072%
3University of Pennsylvania9.858.803–23.9−1.050.795%
5Cornell University8.525.520–41.7≤−3.003.5>99%

By skipper

SkipperSchoolValue Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
Kenneth CorsigFordham University2.733.902–31.0+1.170.924%
Edward CookGeorgetown University2.943.054–13.9+0.110.072%

Match by match

Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).

Rd#WinnerLoser P(winner)
11University of PennsylvaniaCornell University77%
12Georgetown UniversityFordham University91%
13Hobart and William Smith CollegesUniversity of Pennsylvania13%upset
14Georgetown UniversityCornell University80%
15Fordham UniversityUniversity of Pennsylvania10%upset
16Hobart and William Smith CollegesCornell University44%upset
17Hobart and William Smith CollegesFordham University60%
18University of PennsylvaniaGeorgetown University49%upset
19Fordham UniversityCornell University27%upset
110Georgetown UniversityHobart and William Smith Colleges85%
111Georgetown UniversityHobart and William Smith Colleges85%
412University of PennsylvaniaFordham University90%

Round 1

TeamRec.HoyasStatesmenQuakersRamsRed
Georgetown University Hoyas4–1✕WLWW
Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen3–2L✕WWW
University of Pennsylvania Quakers2–2WL✕LW
Fordham University Rams2–2LLW✕W
Cornell University Big Red0–4LLLL✕

Round 4

TeamRec.QuakersRams
University of Pennsylvania Quakers1–0✕W
Fordham University Rams0–1L✕
# Winner Loser Pos.
1 University of Pennsylvania Quakers 2-3-5 def. Cornell University Big Red 1-4-6
2 Georgetown University Hoyas 1-2-6 def. Fordham University Rams 3-4-5
3 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen 1-2-5 def. University of Pennsylvania Quakers 3-4-6
4 Georgetown University Hoyas 1-2-3 def. Cornell University Big Red 4-5-6
5 Fordham University Rams 2-3-4 def. University of Pennsylvania Quakers 1-5-6
6 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen 1-2-6 def. Cornell University Big Red 3-4-5
7 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen 1-2-5 def. Fordham University Rams 3-4-6
8 University of Pennsylvania Quakers 1-3-6 def. Georgetown University Hoyas 2-4-5
9 Fordham University Rams 1-2-6 def. Cornell University Big Red 3-4-5
10 Georgetown University Hoyas 1-2-3 def. Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen 4-5-6
11 Georgetown University Hoyas 1-2-3 def. Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen 4-5-6
12 University of Pennsylvania Quakers 1-2-6 def. Fordham University Rams 3-4-5

Conditions — 03/04/2023 (8am–6pm)

☁️Overcast
Humidity 54%  ·  Pressure 1006.2 hPa

Temperature

50°F
↑ 54°F   ↓ 45°F
Feels like 40°F

Wind

● from   ▲ toward
14.4 kn
avg  ·  max 17.2 kn
Gusts to 35.4 kn
From WNW (298°)

Sky & Precipitation

Cloud cover52% Sunshine7.9 hrs Humidity54% Pressure1006.2 hPa

What this breeze does at George Washington/Georgetown — from fleet racing

Breeze: NW about 15 kn (weather reanalysis in the scorer’s units)
In fleet races at George Washington/Georgetown in this breeze: a favourites’ day (+0.03)
Favourites’ conditions: in fleet racing here the results follow the ratings more closely than usual, and the top seeds hold their places.

Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.03 means a rating gap counts about 2% more than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.

Orderliness beyond the fleet at George Washington/Georgetown by wind direction (angle) and speed (rings), fitted surface; dots are labelled regatta-days, ★ this regatta (no labelled days at George Washington/Georgetown: the all-venue pattern is shown).

From the notes

Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.

All notes →