SEISA Open Team Race Championship

# SchoolTeam Rec.
1 Tulane University Tulane University Green Wave 9–0
2 University of Texas University of Texas Longhorns 6–3
3 Texas A&M University Texas A&M University Aggies 3–6
4 Texas A&M University at Galveston Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 0–9

Pre-event forecast

Fitted on the 21,260 team race matches sailed before 2023-04-15, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 18 of 18 matches (100%) with a log-loss of 0.073 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went well for the forecast. Orderliness +0.47 ± 0.48: a typical event, more orderly than 92% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.

PlaceSchool Pred. Strength Boats (skipper / crew, boat value) Pred. win % Recordvs forecast
1Tulane University
Green Wave
19.29
school +0.17, home +0.44
Zander King / Abigail Borggaard 2.78
Thad Lettsome / Matheo Graham-Capasso 2.95
Asher Zittrer / Brady Starck 2.94
100%9–0 (100%)+0.0
2University of Texas
Longhorns
24.76
school +0.10
Ethan Froelich / Sophia Herrada 2.44
Etienne Black / Rohit Rajan 0.49
John Mason / Leigha Forrest 1.69
63%6–3 (67%)+0.3
3Texas A&M University
Aggies
32.32
school −0.10
Cole Broberg / John Lee 0.46
Hanna Progelhof / Ian Casteel 1.07
Ryan Ingram / Maggie Menefee
27%3–6 (33%)+0.6
4Texas A&M University at Galveston
Aggies
41.32
school −0.20
Jacob Granberry / Brett Pearson 0.83
Isaac Barkley / Jean-Luc Murray 0.63
Cecillia Siegel / Luke Tezza
10%0–9 (0%)−0.9

Surprisal: who beat their rating

Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.

PlaceSchoolStrength Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
1Tulane University9.2912.299–09.0≥+3.000.096%
2University of Texas4.765.956–35.7+1.200.272%
3Texas A&M University2.323.053–62.4+0.730.349%
4Texas A&M University at Galveston1.32-1.680–90.9≤−3.001.4>99%

By skipper

SkipperSchoolValue Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
Asher ZittrerTulane University2.945.949–09.0≥+3.000.096%
Etienne BlackUniversity of Texas0.491.696–35.7+1.200.272%
John MasonUniversity of Texas1.692.886–35.7+1.200.272%
Cole BrobergTexas A&M University0.461.183–62.4+0.730.349%
Hanna ProgelhofTexas A&M University1.071.803–62.4+0.730.349%
Jacob GranberryTexas A&M University at Galveston0.83-2.170–90.9≤−3.001.4>99%
Isaac BarkleyTexas A&M University at Galveston0.63-2.370–90.9≤−3.001.4>99%
Cecillia SiegelTexas A&M University at Galveston-0.21-3.210–90.9≤−3.001.4>99%

Match by match

Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).

Rd#WinnerLoser P(winner)
11Tulane UniversityTexas A&M University at Galveston100%
12University of TexasTexas A&M University94%
13University of TexasTexas A&M University at Galveston97%
14Tulane UniversityTexas A&M University100%
15Tulane UniversityUniversity of Texas99%
16Texas A&M UniversityTexas A&M University at Galveston73%
27Tulane UniversityTexas A&M University at Galveston100%
28University of TexasTexas A&M University92%
29University of TexasTexas A&M University at Galveston97%
210Tulane UniversityTexas A&M University100%
211Tulane UniversityUniversity of Texas99%
212Texas A&M UniversityTexas A&M University at Galveston73%
313Tulane UniversityTexas A&M University at Galveston100%
314University of TexasTexas A&M University91%
315University of TexasTexas A&M University at Galveston97%
316Tulane UniversityTexas A&M University100%
317Tulane UniversityUniversity of Texas99%
318Texas A&M UniversityTexas A&M University at Galveston73%

Round 1

TeamRec.WaveLonghornsAggiesAggies
Tulane University Green Wave3–0✕WWW
University of Texas Longhorns2–1L✕WW
Texas A&M University Aggies1–2LL✕W
Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies0–3LLL✕

Round 2

TeamRec.WaveLonghornsAggiesAggies
Tulane University Green Wave3–0✕WWW
University of Texas Longhorns2–1L✕WW
Texas A&M University Aggies1–2LL✕W
Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies0–3LLL✕

Round 3

TeamRec.WaveLonghornsAggiesAggies
Tulane University Green Wave3–0✕WWW
University of Texas Longhorns2–1L✕WW
Texas A&M University Aggies1–2LL✕W
Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies0–3LLL✕
# Winner Loser Pos.
1 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-3 def. Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 4-5-6 DNS,DNS,DNS
2 University of Texas Longhorns 1-2-3 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 4-5-6
3 University of Texas Longhorns 1-4-5 def. Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 2-3-6 DNF
4 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-3 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 4-5-6
5 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-3 def. University of Texas Longhorns 4-5-6
6 Texas A&M University Aggies 1-2-5 def. Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 3-4-6
7 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-3 def. Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 4-5-6
8 University of Texas Longhorns 1-2-6 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 3-4-5
9 University of Texas Longhorns 1-2-4 def. Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 3-5-6
10 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-3 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 4-5-6
11 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-3 def. University of Texas Longhorns 4-5-6
12 Texas A&M University Aggies 1-3-6 def. Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 2-4-5
13 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-3 def. Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 4-5-6
14 University of Texas Longhorns 1-2-4 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 3-5-6
15 University of Texas Longhorns 1-4-5 def. Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 2-3-6
16 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-3 def. Texas A&M University Aggies 4-5-6
17 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-4 def. University of Texas Longhorns 3-5-6
18 Texas A&M University Aggies 1-2-3 def. Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies 4-5-6

Conditions — 04/15/2023 (8am–6pm)

☁️Overcast
Humidity 89%  ·  Pressure 1014.0 hPa

Temperature

71°F
↑ 76°F   ↓ 67°F
Feels like 73°F

Wind

● from   ▲ toward
8.8 kn
avg  ·  max 13.0 kn
Gusts to 22.9 kn
From SSE (154°)

Sky & Precipitation

Cloud cover100% Sunshine3.1 hrs Humidity89% Pressure1014.0 hPa Rain0.85 in

What this breeze does at Tulane — from fleet racing

Breeze: SE about 11 kn (weather reanalysis in the scorer’s units)
In fleet races at Tulane in this breeze: a favourites’ day (+0.05)
Favourites’ conditions: in fleet racing here the results follow the ratings more closely than usual, and the top seeds hold their places.

Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.05 means a rating gap counts about 5% more than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.

Orderliness beyond the fleet at Tulane by wind direction (angle) and speed (rings), fitted surface; dots are labelled regatta-days, ★ this regatta (38 labelled fleet-race days at Tulane).

From the notes

Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.

All notes →