Chenard Cup

# SchoolTeam A B TOT
1 University of North Carolina University of North Carolina Tar Heels 1 6 4 10
2 Clemson University Clemson University Tigers 1 6 8 14
3 Clemson University Clemson University Tigers 2 13 10 23
4 Clemson University Clemson University Tigers 3 10 14 24
5 Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Yellow Jackets 1 15 17 32
6 University of North Carolina University of North Carolina Tar Heels 2 15 20 35
7 University of North Carolina at Wilmington University of North Carolina at Wilmington Seahawks 31 14 45
8 Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Yellow Jackets 2 28 25 53
9 Tigers Tigers Tigers 36 24 60
10 University of Tennessee University of Tennessee Volunteers 27 34 61
11 Vanderbilt University Vanderbilt University Commodores 35 29 64
12 University of Georgia University of Georgia Bulldogs 2 30 35 65
13 University of Georgia University of Georgia Bulldogs 1 24 42 66
SchoolTeam R1 R2 R3 TOT Sailors
Clemson University Clemson University Tigers 1 1 1 4 6 Nilah Miller '25
Sam Heighway '25
University of North Carolina University of North Carolina Tar Heels 1 2 3 1 6 John Cole Mcgee '26
Kathleen Hale '26
Clemson University Clemson University Tigers 3 3 2 5 10 Jack Houseal '27
Anthony Lattanzio '27
Clemson University Clemson University Tigers 2 6 4 3 13 Rowan Barnes '26
Paige Phillips '25
University of North Carolina University of North Carolina Tar Heels 2 4 5 6 15 May Proctor '27
Matthias Pietrus '24
Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Yellow Jackets 1 5 8 2 15 Christopher Lucyk '24
Charlotte Meyers '25
University of Georgia University of Georgia Bulldogs 1 8 6 10 24 Emma Pope '25
Emma Smith '24
University of Tennessee University of Tennessee Volunteers 12 7 8 27 Kate Pierce '24
Crispin Martin '25
Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Yellow Jackets 2 7 9 12 28 James Keller '25
Charles Federico '25
University of Georgia University of Georgia Bulldogs 2 13 10 7 30 Sarah Weese '24
Mariam Kalathil '27
University of North Carolina at Wilmington University of North Carolina at Wilmington Seahawks 11 11 9 31 Torin Stremlau '25
Anna Pederson '25
Vanderbilt University Vanderbilt University Commodores 10 DNF 11 35 Gregory Gold '25
Gabriella Modugno '24
Tigers Tigers Tigers 9 DNF 13 36
SchoolTeam R1 R2 R3 TOT Sailors
University of North Carolina University of North Carolina Tar Heels 1 1 2 1 4 Noah Jost '27
Julia Brighton '27
Clemson University Clemson University Tigers 1 2 1 5 8 Ashton Loring '26
Carter Durst '26
Clemson University Clemson University Tigers 2 3 3 4 10 Trevin Brown '26
Parker Sutt '26
University of North Carolina at Wilmington University of North Carolina at Wilmington Seahawks 6 5 3 14 Owen O’Rourke '27
Tonya Hakim '25
Clemson University Clemson University Tigers 3 8 4 2 14 Max Braun '25
Lucas Bush '25
Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Yellow Jackets 1 4 7 6 17 Kaitlyn Bagnoni '25
Sofia Moreno '25
University of North Carolina University of North Carolina Tar Heels 2 7 6 7 20 Davis Smith '23
Sarina Schmoyer '27
Tigers Tigers Tigers 5 10 9 24
Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Yellow Jackets 2 9 8 8 25 Lauren Mellinger '25
Abby Van Brimmer '27
Vanderbilt University Vanderbilt University Commodores 10 9 10 29 Nelson Chow '24
Flora Johnson '27
University of Tennessee University of Tennessee Volunteers 11 11 12 34 Matthew Blessington '24
Jack Ruzzo '26
University of Georgia University of Georgia Bulldogs 2 12 12 11 35 Sarah Weese '24
Mariam Kalathil '27
University of Georgia University of Georgia Bulldogs 1 DNS DNS DNS 42 Brigitte Lueder '25
Jessi Bridges '27
Boat Speed Analyzer
SlowExpected boat effectFast
−0.140+0.14
Places per race a team should expect to gain or lose in this boat against what its sailors' ratings predict, from a model of this fleet fitted on every regatta sailed here since Fall 2013 (16 regattas). Shown at the 40% that holds up on regattas the model never saw; hover a sail for its value and uncertainty. Grey = boat not in the fit. How this is estimated.

Division A

Team1A2A3A
TigersTigers Tigers111
Clemson UniversityClemson University Tigers 1222
Clemson UniversityClemson University Tigers 2333
Clemson UniversityClemson University Tigers 3444
University of GeorgiaUniversity of Georgia Bulldogs 1777
University of GeorgiaUniversity of Georgia Bulldogs 2888
Georgia Institute of TechnologyGeorgia Institute of Technology Yellow Jackets 1555
Georgia Institute of TechnologyGeorgia Institute of Technology Yellow Jackets 2666
University of North CarolinaUniversity of North Carolina Tar Heels 1999
University of North CarolinaUniversity of North Carolina Tar Heels 2101010
University of TennesseeUniversity of Tennessee Volunteers121212
University of North Carolina at WilmingtonUniversity of North Carolina at Wilmington Seahawks111111
Vanderbilt UniversityVanderbilt University Commodores131313

Division B

Team1B2B3B
TigersTigers Tigers222
Clemson UniversityClemson University Tigers 1333
Clemson UniversityClemson University Tigers 2444
Clemson UniversityClemson University Tigers 3555
University of GeorgiaUniversity of Georgia Bulldogs 1888
University of GeorgiaUniversity of Georgia Bulldogs 2999
Georgia Institute of TechnologyGeorgia Institute of Technology Yellow Jackets 1666
Georgia Institute of TechnologyGeorgia Institute of Technology Yellow Jackets 2777
University of North CarolinaUniversity of North Carolina Tar Heels 1101010
University of North CarolinaUniversity of North Carolina Tar Heels 2111111
University of TennesseeUniversity of Tennessee Volunteers131313
University of North Carolina at WilmingtonUniversity of North Carolina at Wilmington Seahawks121212
Vanderbilt UniversityVanderbilt University Commodores111

Conditions — 09/30/2023 (8am–6pm)

☀️Clear sky
Humidity 57%  ·  Pressure 1020.3 hPa

Temperature

78°F
↑ 84°F   ↓ 62°F
Feels like 81°F

Wind

● from   ▲ toward
2.6 kn
avg  ·  max 4.3 kn
Gusts to 8.7 kn
From ENE (65°)

Sky & Precipitation

Cloud cover19% Sunshine10.1 hrs Humidity57% Pressure1020.3 hPa

Orderliness — underdogs or favourites?

Breeze: NE 6 kn (weather reanalysis in the scorer’s units)
In this breeze at Georgia Tech: an underdogs’ day (−0.04)
Expect upsets: lower-rated teams have a better chance of beating the seeds, and the fleet bunches up.
Fleet adjustment +0.11 (a softer or greener fleet makes the ratings stick) · combined forecast +0.07
Actual: about typical, within noise (−0.08 ± 0.21)

Orderliness is how tightly the finishing order followed the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0). Positive is the favourites’ day: the ratings carried more weight than usual and the top seeds finished where expected. Negative is the underdogs’ day: the fleet compressed and the favourites came back to the pack. A value of ±0.04 means a rating gap counts about 4% less than on a typical day.

The breeze reading is the chart’s value at this regatta’s wind direction and speed (the star): this venue’s pattern of which directions bring order and which bring upsets, with breeze generally orderly and light air surprising. The fleet adjustment comes from the entry list: the stronger and more experienced the fleet, the more surprising the racing. How this is estimated · compare venues.

Orderliness beyond the fleet at Georgia Tech by wind direction (angle) and speed (rings), fitted surface; dots are labelled regatta-days, ★ this regatta (only 5 labelled days at Georgia Tech, so the surface is mostly the all-venue pattern).

From the notes

Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.

All notes →