SAISA North Points #2

# SchoolTeam A B TOT
1 College of Charleston College of Charleston Cougars 8 16 24
2 Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Yellow Jackets 16 13 29
3 Clemson University Clemson University Tigers 13 30 43
4 Auburn University Auburn University Tigers 29 22 51
5 Duke University Duke University Blue Devils 36 27 63
6 University of Tennessee University of Tennessee Volunteers 29 42 71
7 North Carolina State University North Carolina State University Wolfpack 40 31 71
8 University of Georgia University of Georgia Georgia 47 39 86
9 Auburn University Auburn University War Eagle 52 51 103
SchoolTeam R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 TOT Sailors
College of Charleston College of Charleston Cougars 2 1 1 1 2 1 8 Charles Rees '16
Honore Johnson '16
Clemson University Clemson University Tigers 1 3 2 2 3 2 13 Edwin Strong '15
Emily Klug '14
Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Yellow Jackets 3 2 3 3 1 4 16 John Reddaway '15
James Elder '15
University of Tennessee University of Tennessee Volunteers 4 6 5 4 4 6 29 John Lindahl '15
Becca Hofmeister '14
Auburn University Auburn University Tigers 5 4 6 6 5 3 29 Samuel Hodges '13
Henry Risberg '16
Duke University Duke University Blue Devils 6 5 7 7 6 5 36 Jackson Morton '14
Deanna White '16
North Carolina State University North Carolina State University Wolfpack 9 8 4 5 7 7 40 Benton Morton '14
Paulina Spencer '16
University of Georgia University of Georgia Georgia 7 7 8 8 8 9 47 Lauren Mclean '13
Benjamin Hicks '14
Auburn University Auburn University War Eagle 8 9 9 9 9 8 52 Thomas Andrews '13
Anna Sprague '14
SchoolTeam R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 TOT Sailors
Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Yellow Jackets 2 2 1 4 3 1 13 Marten Kendrick '15
Elizabeth Rahn '15
College of Charleston College of Charleston Cougars 1 3 6 2 1 3 16 Katherine Baker '14
Courtney Alexander '14
Auburn University Auburn University Tigers 3 4 4 1 4 6 22 Wesley Wallace '14
Chase Horton '14
Duke University Duke University Blue Devils 5 1 8 6 5 2 27 Alexander Katsis '14
Jennifer Yland '14
Clemson University Clemson University Tigers 4 5 3 3 DNF 5 30 William Duncan '14 [1-2]
Hugh Forester-Bennett '13 [3-4]
Alexander Rigsby '13 [5-6]
Andrew Corriveau '15 [1-4, 6]
Evelyn Moseley '15 [5]
North Carolina State University North Carolina State University Wolfpack 7 8 5 5 2 4 31 David Rogers '15
Daniel Ahern '15
University of Georgia University of Georgia Georgia 8 6 2 8 7 8 39 Matthew Weber '15 [1-6]
Grant Grussing '15 [1-2, 5-6]
Benjamin Burghaus '14 [3-4]
University of Tennessee University of Tennessee Volunteers 6 7 7 9 6 7 42 Mark Buchanan '13
Auburn University Auburn University War Eagle 9 9 9 7 8 9 51 Logan Little '12
Jon Blinkhorn '13
Boat Speed Analyzer
SlowExpected boat effectFast
−0.050+0.05
Places per race a team should expect to gain or lose in this boat against what its sailors' ratings predict, from a model of this fleet fitted on every regatta sailed here since Spring 2012 (13 regattas). Shown at the 40% that holds up on regattas the model never saw; hover a sail for its value and uncertainty. Grey = boat not in the fit. How this is estimated.

Division A

Team1A2A3A4A5A6A
Auburn UniversityAuburn University Tigers113355
Auburn UniversityAuburn University War Eagle881133
College of CharlestonCollege of Charleston Cougars335577
Clemson UniversityClemson University Tigers224466
Duke UniversityDuke University Blue Devils446688
University of GeorgiaUniversity of Georgia Georgia557799
Georgia Institute of TechnologyGeorgia Institute of Technology Yellow Jackets668811
North Carolina State UniversityNorth Carolina State University Wolfpack992244
University of TennesseeUniversity of Tennessee Volunteers779922

Division B

Team1B2B3B4B5B6B
Auburn UniversityAuburn University Tigers224466
Auburn UniversityAuburn University War Eagle992244
College of CharlestonCollege of Charleston Cougars446688
Clemson UniversityClemson University Tigers335577
Duke UniversityDuke University Blue Devils557799
University of GeorgiaUniversity of Georgia Georgia668811
Georgia Institute of TechnologyGeorgia Institute of Technology Yellow Jackets779922
North Carolina State UniversityNorth Carolina State University Wolfpack113355
University of TennesseeUniversity of Tennessee Volunteers881133

Conditions — 03/02/2013 (8am–6pm)

🌦️Light drizzle
Humidity 65%  ·  Pressure 1013.4 hPa

Temperature

43°F
↑ 47°F   ↓ 36°F
Feels like 37°F

Wind

● from   ▲ toward
4.7 kn
avg  ·  max 8.6 kn
Gusts to 19.0 kn
From W (280°)

Sky & Precipitation

Cloud cover70% Sunshine9.1 hrs Humidity65% Pressure1013.4 hPa Rain0.04 in

Orderliness — underdogs or favourites?

Breeze: W 7 kn (weather reanalysis in the scorer’s units)
In this breeze at Clemson: a typical day (−0.00)
Nothing in the breeze favours either side; expect results to follow the ratings about as usual.
Fleet adjustment +0.09 (a softer or greener fleet makes the ratings stick) · combined forecast +0.09
Actual: about typical, within noise (+0.25 ± 0.15)

Orderliness is how tightly the finishing order followed the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0). Positive is the favourites’ day: the ratings carried more weight than usual and the top seeds finished where expected. Negative is the underdogs’ day: the fleet compressed and the favourites came back to the pack. A value of ±0.00 means a rating gap counts about 1% less than on a typical day.

The breeze reading is the chart’s value at this regatta’s wind direction and speed (the star): this venue’s pattern of which directions bring order and which bring upsets, with breeze generally orderly and light air surprising. The fleet adjustment comes from the entry list: the stronger and more experienced the fleet, the more surprising the racing. How this is estimated · compare venues.

Orderliness beyond the fleet at Clemson by wind direction (angle) and speed (rings), fitted surface; dots are labelled regatta-days, ★ this regatta (15 labelled days at Clemson).

From the notes

Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.

All notes →