SAISA Women's Team Race Championship

# SchoolTeam Rec.
1 College of Charleston College of Charleston Cougars 10–1
2 University of South Florida University of South Florida Bulls 8–3
3 Jacksonville University Jacksonville University Fins 6–5
4 North Carolina State University North Carolina State University Wolfpack 2–9
5 Eckerd College Eckerd College Tritons 0–8

Pre-event forecast

Fitted on the 21,260 team race matches sailed before 2023-04-15, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 23 of 26 matches (88%) with a log-loss of 0.333 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went well for the forecast. Orderliness +0.41 ± 0.36: an orderly event, more orderly than 86% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.

PlaceSchool Pred. Strength Boats (skipper / crew, boat value) Pred. win % Recordvs forecast
1College of Charleston
Cougars
18.30
school +0.38
Grace Squires / Marina Dryer 2.74
Emma Tallman / Roxanne Snyder 2.69
Emily Alfortish / Chloe Hudgins 2.47
91%10–1 (91%)+0.0
2University of South Florida
Bulls
36.33
school −0.10
Emma Shakespeare / Olivia Smith 2.23
Heidi Hicks / Jewel "Min Min" Kelly 1.80
Sydney Monahan / Saleta Powell 2.38
51%8–3 (73%)+2.4
3Jacksonville University
Fins
26.35
school −0.07
Emily Allen / Reagan Carris 2.67
Kaitlyn Liebel / Mary Mann 1.77
Agija Elerte / Ella Bilow 1.95
51%6–5 (55%)+0.4
4North Carolina State University
Wolfpack
45.79
school +0.11
Isabella Du Plessis / Weatherley Tripp 2.06
Olivia Sowa / Jane Caroline Minchew
Annika Milstien / Abby Scudder
37%2–9 (18%)−2.1
5Eckerd College
Tritons
54.18
school −0.12
Eden Nykamp / Elissa Martinez 2.33
Tia Soultanakis / Tess Levanway
Lily Schwartz / Amelia Johnson 1.14
10%0–8 (0%)−0.8

Surprisal: who beat their rating

Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.

PlaceSchoolStrength Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
2University of South Florida6.337.708–35.6+1.362.38%
3Jacksonville University6.356.566–55.6+0.210.153%
1College of Charleston8.308.3010–110.0+0.000.074%
4North Carolina State University5.794.482–94.1−1.311.898%
5Eckerd College4.181.180–80.8≤−3.001.2>99%

By skipper

SkipperSchoolValue Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
Agija ElerteJacksonville University1.952.166–55.6+0.210.153%
Isabella Du PlessisNorth Carolina State University2.060.752–94.1−1.311.898%
Annika MilstienNorth Carolina State University1.28-0.032–94.1−1.311.898%

Match by match

Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).

Rd#WinnerLoser P(winner)
11University of South FloridaNorth Carolina State University66%
12College of CharlestonEckerd College99%
13Jacksonville UniversityNorth Carolina State University65%
14University of South FloridaCollege of Charleston12%upset
15Jacksonville UniversityEckerd College90%
16College of CharlestonNorth Carolina State University93%
17University of South FloridaEckerd College90%
18College of CharlestonJacksonville University88%
19North Carolina State UniversityEckerd College83%
110Jacksonville UniversityUniversity of South Florida50%
211College of CharlestonUniversity of South Florida88%
212Jacksonville UniversityEckerd College89%
213University of South FloridaNorth Carolina State University63%
214College of CharlestonEckerd College98%
215Jacksonville UniversityNorth Carolina State University63%
216University of South FloridaEckerd College89%
217College of CharlestonJacksonville University88%
218North Carolina State UniversityEckerd College82%
219University of South FloridaJacksonville University50%upset
220College of CharlestonNorth Carolina State University92%
221University of South FloridaJacksonville University49%upset
222College of CharlestonNorth Carolina State University92%
223Jacksonville UniversityNorth Carolina State University63%
224College of CharlestonUniversity of South Florida88%
225University of South FloridaNorth Carolina State University62%
226College of CharlestonJacksonville University88%

Round 1

TeamRec.CougarsBullsFinsWolfpackTritons
College of Charleston Cougars3–1✕LWWW
University of South Florida Bulls3–1W✕LWW
Jacksonville University Fins3–1LW✕WW
North Carolina State University Wolfpack1–3LLL✕W
Eckerd College Tritons0–4LLLL✕

Round 2

TeamRec.CougarsBullsFinsWolfpackTritons
College of Charleston Cougars7–0✕WWWW
University of South Florida Bulls5–2L✕WWW
Jacksonville University Fins3–4LL✕WW
North Carolina State University Wolfpack1–6LLL✕W
Eckerd College Tritons0–4LLLL✕
# Winner Loser Pos.
1 University of South Florida Bulls 1-2-5 def. North Carolina State University Wolfpack 3-4-6
2 College of Charleston Cougars 1-2-5 def. Eckerd College Tritons 3-4-6
3 Jacksonville University Fins 1-2-5 def. North Carolina State University Wolfpack 3-4-6
4 University of South Florida Bulls 1-2-5 def. College of Charleston Cougars 3-4-6
5 Jacksonville University Fins 1-2-5 def. Eckerd College Tritons 3-4-6
6 College of Charleston Cougars 1-3-4 def. North Carolina State University Wolfpack 2-5-6
7 University of South Florida Bulls 1-2-3 def. Eckerd College Tritons 4-5-6
8 College of Charleston Cougars 1-2-5 def. Jacksonville University Fins 3-4-6
9 North Carolina State University Wolfpack 1-3-4 def. Eckerd College Tritons 2-5-6
10 Jacksonville University Fins 2-3-4 def. University of South Florida Bulls 1-5-6
11 College of Charleston Cougars 1-3-4 def. University of South Florida Bulls 2-5-6
12 Jacksonville University Fins 1-2-3 def. Eckerd College Tritons 4-5-6
13 University of South Florida Bulls 1-2-6 def. North Carolina State University Wolfpack 3-4-5
14 College of Charleston Cougars 1-2-4 def. Eckerd College Tritons 3-5-6
15 Jacksonville University Fins 1-2-5 def. North Carolina State University Wolfpack 3-4-6
16 University of South Florida Bulls 1-2-4 def. Eckerd College Tritons 3-5-6
17 College of Charleston Cougars 1-2-5 def. Jacksonville University Fins 3-4-6
18 North Carolina State University Wolfpack 1-3-5 def. Eckerd College Tritons 2-4-6
19 University of South Florida Bulls 1-2-4 def. Jacksonville University Fins 3-5-6
20 College of Charleston Cougars 1-2-5 def. North Carolina State University Wolfpack 3-4-6
21 University of South Florida Bulls 1-4-5 def. Jacksonville University Fins 2-3-6
22 College of Charleston Cougars 1-2-5 def. North Carolina State University Wolfpack 3-4-6
23 Jacksonville University Fins 1-2-4 def. North Carolina State University Wolfpack 3-5-6
24 College of Charleston Cougars 2-3-4 def. University of South Florida Bulls 1-5-6
25 University of South Florida Bulls 1-2-3 def. North Carolina State University Wolfpack 4-5-6
26 College of Charleston Cougars 1-2-4 def. Jacksonville University Fins 3-5-6

Conditions — 04/15/2023 (8am–6pm)

☀️Clear sky
Humidity 64%  ·  Pressure 1015.5 hPa

Temperature

75°F
↑ 81°F   ↓ 64°F
Feels like 77°F

Wind

● from   ▲ toward
6.7 kn
avg  ·  max 11.2 kn
Gusts to 19.2 kn
From SW (235°)

Sky & Precipitation

Cloud cover33% Sunshine11.0 hrs Humidity64% Pressure1015.5 hPa

What this breeze does at Charleston — from fleet racing

Breeze: SW about 9 kn (weather reanalysis in the scorer’s units)
In fleet races at Charleston in this breeze: a typical day (+0.02)
Nothing in this breeze favours either side in fleet racing here: results follow the ratings about as usual.

Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.02 means a rating gap counts about 2% more than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.

Orderliness beyond the fleet at Charleston by wind direction (angle) and speed (rings), fitted surface; dots are labelled regatta-days, ★ this regatta (69 labelled fleet-race days at Charleston).

From the notes

Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.

All notes →