Roger Williams University '29
How much better or worse boats do with this sailor crewing than their skipper's rating predicts, shown on the skipper scale so crews can be lined up across teams. Percentiles compare against rostered crews that season (league) or teammates (team).
How crew ratings work →Crew effect over their whole career, not scaled to a team: 17.23 percentile among ICSA crews with 30+ races. Uncertainty ±0.106 rating points from 47 races with rated skippers.
How crew ratings work →| Season | Team | Rating | Range | League percentile |
Team percentile |
On team | Races | Team page |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fall 2025 | Roger Williams University | 2.16 | 68.90 | 16.67 | 18 of 21 | 47 | Team page |
A team race rating is what the sailor brings to one of the three boats: 0.72 x their fleet rating plus a team-race offset learned from every match they sailed, shrunk toward zero so a few matches cannot move it far. Sides are compared by the sum of their three boats plus the school's team race strength.
| Rating | Rank | vs fleet rating | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.46 | unranked (fewer than 30 matches as skipper, or not active) | +0.00 about what the fleet rating predicts |
as crew 35–10 (78%) |
| Season | Regattas | Skipper W–L | Crew W–L |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spring 2026 | 3 | — | 35–10 |
For each regatta, the boat value that would have made this sailor's record least surprising: the shift applied to their boat alone, in the matches they sailed, with team-mates and opponents fixed at the pre-event forecast. A boat's skipper and crew share the boat, so they get the same number when they sailed every match together. Surprise is in bits at the pre-event value minus at the performance value; P(this good or better) treats the matches as independent at the forecast probabilities. Regattas forecast from fewer than 1,000 training matches are left out.
Over 3 graded regattas (45 matches) the record is 35–10 against 33.3 wins the pre-event forecasts expected (+1.7). 1 regatta clearly above the rating (P ≤ 20%), 0 clearly below (P ≥ 80%); 3 bits of surprise in all.
| Date | Regatta | Role | Value | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins |
Δ | Surprise (bits) |
P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-11 | Thompson Trophy | crew | 3.25 | 3.33 | 8–7 | 7.8 | +0.08 | 0.0 | 57% |
| 2026-03-28 | Jumbo Team Race | crew | 3.39 | 3.30 | 19–3 | 19.2 | −0.10 | 0.0 | 70% |
| 2026-03-21 | RWU Team Race | crew | 2.69 | 5.69 | 8–0 | 6.3 | ≥+3.00 | 2.8 | 13% |
| Regatta | Role | Div | Races | Avg | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spring 2026 Team page Season | |||||
| Thompson Trophy | Crew | TR | 15 | 53% | — |
| RWU Team Race | Crew | TR | 10 | 100% | — |
| Jumbo Team Race | Crew | TR | 22 | 86% | — |
| Fall 2025 Team page Season | |||||
| Salt Pond Sunday | Crew | B | 4 | 4.8 | +0.01 |
| Nickerson Trophy | Crew | B | 14 | 4.8 | -1.13 |
| Mt. Hope Bay Invite | Crew | A | 12 | 4.6 | +0.17 |
| The George Warren Smith Trophy 25 | Crew | B | 7 | 6.6 | -0.05 |
| Eagle Invite | Crew | B | 10 | 7.1 | +0.20 |
Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.
