SAISA Team Race Conference Championships

# SchoolTeam Rec.
1 College of Charleston College of Charleston Cougars 8–2
2 Jacksonville University Jacksonville University Fins 8–2
3 University of South Florida University of South Florida Bulls 4–6
4 Eckerd College Eckerd College Tritons 2–8
5 University of Miami University of Miami Hurricanes 0–4

Pre-event forecast

Fitted on the 13,407 team race matches sailed before 2019-04-06, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 18 of 22 matches (82%) with a log-loss of 0.469 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went about as expected for the forecast. Orderliness −0.13 ± 0.37: a typical event, more orderly than 30% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.

PlaceSchool Pred. Strength Boats (skipper / crew, boat value) Pred. win % Recordvs forecast
1College of Charleston
Cougars
111.22
school +0.49
Jack Brown / Hunter Skinner 3.46
Steven Leuck / Payton Alexander 3.43
Augie Dale / Katherine Lounsbury 3.83
91%8–2 (80%)−1.1
2Jacksonville University
Fins
29.63
school +0.26
Alfonso Garcia Bringas / Daniel Ofarril 3.52
Andre Guaragna / Caroline Bourgeois 3.15
Stephan Verhulst / Ana Carrasco 2.68
59%8–2 (80%)+2.1
3University of South Florida
Bulls
48.26
school +0.09
John Whitehead / John Monahan 2.57
Scott Ewing / Carolina Perez Rovira 2.42
Marina Barzaghi / Darby Capellin 3.13
26%4–6 (40%)+1.4
4Eckerd College
Tritons
38.95
school +0.13
Daniel Vail / Jackie Morrison 2.55
Ian Willoughby / Kim Kusminsky 2.93
Karl Rasmus Sayre / Camryn Kennedy 3.33
42%2–8 (20%)−2.2
5University of Miami
Hurricanes
56.42
school −0.13
Richard Mccann / Grace Harden
Robert Turigliatto / Alex Sidi
Kaitlyn Delisser / Leah Harper
6%0–4 (0%)−0.2

Surprisal: who beat their rating

Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.

PlaceSchoolStrength Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
2Jacksonville University9.6311.178–25.9+1.532.29%
3University of South Florida8.269.114–62.6+0.850.922%
1College of Charleston11.2210.308–29.1−0.920.894%
4Eckerd College8.957.392–84.2−1.562.399%
5University of Miami6.423.420–40.3≤−3.000.4>99%

By skipper

SkipperSchoolValue Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
Alfonso Garcia BringasJacksonville University3.525.068–25.9+1.532.29%
Andre GuaragnaJacksonville University3.154.698–25.9+1.532.29%
Stephan VerhulstJacksonville University2.684.218–25.9+1.532.29%
John WhiteheadUniversity of South Florida2.573.424–62.6+0.850.922%
Scott EwingUniversity of South Florida2.423.274–62.6+0.850.922%
Jack BrownCollege of Charleston3.462.548–29.1−0.920.894%
Augie DaleCollege of Charleston3.832.908–29.1−0.920.894%
Ian WilloughbyEckerd College2.931.372–84.2−1.562.399%
Karl Rasmus SayreEckerd College3.331.772–84.2−1.562.399%
Richard MccannUniversity of Miami2.03-0.970–40.3≤−3.000.4>99%
Robert TurigliattoUniversity of Miami2.34-0.660–40.3≤−3.000.4>99%
Kaitlyn DelisserUniversity of Miami1.94-1.060–40.3≤−3.000.4>99%

Match by match

Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).

Rd#WinnerLoser P(winner)
11Jacksonville UniversityEckerd College67%
12University of South FloridaCollege of Charleston5%upset
13Eckerd CollegeUniversity of Miami94%
14Jacksonville UniversityCollege of Charleston17%upset
15University of South FloridaUniversity of Miami86%
16College of CharlestonEckerd College91%
17Jacksonville UniversityUniversity of South Florida80%
18College of CharlestonUniversity of Miami99%
19Eckerd CollegeUniversity of South Florida67%
110Jacksonville UniversityUniversity of Miami95%
211College of CharlestonEckerd College91%
212Jacksonville UniversityUniversity of South Florida80%
213College of CharlestonUniversity of South Florida95%
214Jacksonville UniversityEckerd College67%
215University of South FloridaEckerd College34%upset
216College of CharlestonJacksonville University83%
317College of CharlestonEckerd College91%
318Jacksonville UniversityUniversity of South Florida80%
319College of CharlestonUniversity of South Florida95%
320Jacksonville UniversityEckerd College67%
321University of South FloridaEckerd College34%upset
322College of CharlestonJacksonville University83%

Round 1

TeamRec.CougarsFinsBullsTritonsHurricanes
College of Charleston Cougars2–2✕LLWW
Jacksonville University Fins4–0W✕WWW
University of South Florida Bulls2–2WL✕LW
Eckerd College Tritons2–2LLW✕W
University of Miami Hurricanes0–4LLLL✕

Round 2

TeamRec.CougarsFinsBullsTritons
College of Charleston Cougars3–0✕WWW
Jacksonville University Fins2–1L✕WW
University of South Florida Bulls1–2LL✕W
Eckerd College Tritons0–3LLL✕

Round 3

TeamRec.CougarsFinsBullsTritons
College of Charleston Cougars3–0✕WWW
Jacksonville University Fins2–1L✕WW
University of South Florida Bulls1–2LL✕W
Eckerd College Tritons0–3LLL✕
# Winner Loser Pos.
1 Jacksonville University Fins 2-3-4 def. Eckerd College Tritons 1-5-6
2 University of South Florida Bulls 1-3-6 def. College of Charleston Cougars 2-4-5
3 Eckerd College Tritons 1-2-4 def. University of Miami Hurricanes 3-5-6
4 Jacksonville University Fins 1-2-6 def. College of Charleston Cougars 3-4-5
5 University of South Florida Bulls 1-2-6 def. University of Miami Hurricanes 3-4-5
6 College of Charleston Cougars 1-2-5 def. Eckerd College Tritons 3-4-6
7 Jacksonville University Fins 1-2-6 def. University of South Florida Bulls 3-4-5
8 College of Charleston Cougars 1-2-3 def. University of Miami Hurricanes 4-5-6
9 Eckerd College Tritons 1-2-5 def. University of South Florida Bulls 3-4-6
10 Jacksonville University Fins 1-2-3 def. University of Miami Hurricanes 4-5-6
11 College of Charleston Cougars 1-2-5 def. Eckerd College Tritons 3-4-6
12 Jacksonville University Fins 1-2-5 def. University of South Florida Bulls 3-4-6
13 College of Charleston Cougars 1-2-3 def. University of South Florida Bulls 4-5-6
14 Jacksonville University Fins 1-2-4 def. Eckerd College Tritons 3-5-6
15 University of South Florida Bulls 1-2-3 def. Eckerd College Tritons 4-5-6
16 College of Charleston Cougars 1-2-6 def. Jacksonville University Fins 3-4-5
17 College of Charleston Cougars 1-2-3 def. Eckerd College Tritons 4-5-6
18 Jacksonville University Fins 1-2-4 def. University of South Florida Bulls 3-5-6
19 College of Charleston Cougars 1-2-3 def. University of South Florida Bulls 4-5-6
20 Jacksonville University Fins 1-2-3 def. Eckerd College Tritons 4-5-6
21 University of South Florida Bulls 1-2-4 def. Eckerd College Tritons 3-5-6
22 College of Charleston Cougars 1-2-4 def. Jacksonville University Fins 3-5-6

Conditions — 04/06/2019 (8am–6pm)

🌦️Light drizzle
Humidity 79%  ·  Pressure 1021.0 hPa

Temperature

67°F
↑ 72°F   ↓ 59°F
Feels like 68°F

Wind

● from   ▲ toward
6.2 kn
avg  ·  max 10.4 kn
Gusts to 20.2 kn
From N (5°)

Sky & Precipitation

Cloud cover90% Sunshine7.7 hrs Humidity79% Pressure1021.0 hPa Rain0.05 in

What this breeze does at UNC Wilmington — from fleet racing

Breeze: N about 9 kn (weather reanalysis in the scorer’s units)
In fleet races at UNC Wilmington in this breeze: an underdogs’ day (−0.05)
Underdogs’ conditions: in fleet racing here the fleet bunches up and lower-rated boats beat the seeds more often than usual.

Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.05 means a rating gap counts about 4% less than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.

Orderliness beyond the fleet at UNC Wilmington by wind direction (angle) and speed (rings), fitted surface; dots are labelled regatta-days, ★ this regatta (15 labelled fleet-race days at UNC Wilmington).

From the notes

Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.

All notes →