Tom Noble Open Team Race

# SchoolTeam Rec.
1 Washington College Washington College Shoremen 7–2
2 Queen's University Queen's University Gaels 4–5
3 Drexel University Drexel University Dragons 6–3
4 Princeton University Princeton University Tigers 1 4–5
5 Princeton University Princeton University Tigers 2 4–5
6 University of Delaware University of Delaware Blue Hens 0–9

Pre-event forecast

Fitted on the 22,017 team race matches sailed before 2024-03-02, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 14 of 18 matches (78%) with a log-loss of 0.402 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went well for the forecast. Orderliness +0.06 ± 0.51: a typical event, more orderly than 49% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.

PlaceSchool Pred. Strength Boats (skipper / crew, boat value) Pred. win % Recordvs forecast
1Washington College
Shoremen
13.96
school −0.19, home +0.43
Matthew Collinson / Mia Snyder 0.70
Joseph Bonacci / Rachel Morgen 1.45
Kennedy Jones / Nora Ciak 4–2
Kennedy Jones / Laurel Krause 1–0
80%5–2 (71%)−0.6
3Drexel University
Dragons
23.54
school −0.07
Iain Shand / Dren Gara 1.36
Toby Sullivan / Chris Bahr
Lucas Randle / Meredith Davies
65%5–2 (71%)+0.5
4Princeton University
Tigers 1
32.78
school −0.09
Jasper Waldman / Kaitlyn Greppin 1.57
Eddie O’Keefe / Vincent Nguyen
Evelyn Walsh / Ana Bucevic
57%4–3 (57%)−0.0
5Princeton University
Tigers 2
42.55
school −0.09
Berkley Yiu / Hali Liu
William Roberts / Nicholas Lorenzen 0.83
Advik Eswaran / Victoria Davies
47%4–4 (50%)+0.3
6University of Delaware
Blue Hens
5-1.00
school −0.12
Ethan Deutsch / Ian Kaplan
Phillip Furlong / John Fulkerson
Myles Wommack / Brian Polak
2%0–7 (0%)−0.1

Surprisal: who beat their rating

Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.

PlaceSchoolStrength Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
3Drexel University Dragons3.543.905–24.5+0.360.153%
5Princeton University Tigers 22.552.754–43.7+0.200.057%
4Princeton University Tigers 12.782.764–34.0−0.020.068%
1Washington College Shoremen3.963.435–25.6−0.530.286%
6University of Delaware Blue Hens-1.00-4.000–70.1≤−3.000.2>99%

By skipper

SkipperSchoolValue Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
Lucas RandleDrexel University-0.010.345–24.5+0.360.153%
Berkley YiuPrinceton University0.610.814–43.7+0.200.057%
William RobertsPrinceton University0.831.034–43.7+0.200.057%
Advik EswaranPrinceton University0.961.164–43.7+0.200.057%
Eddie O’KeefePrinceton University1.081.064–34.0−0.020.068%
Evelyn WalshPrinceton University0.00-0.024–34.0−0.020.068%
Joseph BonacciWashington College1.450.935–25.6−0.530.286%
Ethan DeutschUniversity of Delaware0.09-2.910–70.1≤−3.000.2>99%
Phillip FurlongUniversity of Delaware-0.56-3.560–70.1≤−3.000.2>99%
Myles WommackUniversity of Delaware-0.71-3.710–70.1≤−3.000.2>99%

Match by match

Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).

Rd#WinnerLoser P(winner)
11Princeton University Tigers 1Princeton University Tigers 256%
13Washington College ShoremenUniversity of Delaware Blue Hens99%
14Princeton University Tigers 1Drexel University Dragons36%upset
15Washington College ShoremenPrinceton University Tigers 282%
17Drexel University DragonsWashington College Shoremen37%upset
19Princeton University Tigers 2University of Delaware Blue Hens97%
111Drexel University DragonsPrinceton University Tigers 272%
112Princeton University Tigers 1University of Delaware Blue Hens98%
114Washington College ShoremenPrinceton University Tigers 174%
115Drexel University DragonsUniversity of Delaware Blue Hens99%
216Princeton University Tigers 2Princeton University Tigers 144%upset
218Washington College ShoremenUniversity of Delaware Blue Hens99%
219Drexel University DragonsPrinceton University Tigers 168%
220Princeton University Tigers 2Washington College Shoremen20%upset
222Washington College ShoremenDrexel University Dragons59%
224Princeton University Tigers 2University of Delaware Blue Hens97%
226Drexel University DragonsPrinceton University Tigers 273%
227Princeton University Tigers 1University of Delaware Blue Hens98%

Round 1

TeamRec.ShoremenGaelsDragons12Hens
Washington College Shoremen4–1✕WLWWW
Queen's University Gaels4–1L✕WWWW
Drexel University Dragons3–2WL✕WWW
Princeton University Tigers 14–6LLL✕✕W
Princeton University Tigers 24–6LLL✕✕W
University of Delaware Blue Hens0–5LLLLL✕

Round 2

TeamRec.ShoremenGaelsDragons12Hens
Washington College Shoremen3–1✕WWLLW
Queen's University Gaels2–2L✕LWWW
Drexel University Dragons3–1LW✕WW–
Princeton University Tigers 14–4WLL✕✕W
Princeton University Tigers 24–4WLL✕✕W
University of Delaware Blue Hens0–4LL–LL✕
# Winner Loser Pos.
1 Princeton University Tigers 1 1-2-4 def. Princeton University Tigers 2 3-5-6
2 Queen's University Gaels 1-2-5 def. Drexel University Dragons 3-4-6
3 Washington College Shoremen 1-2-3 def. University of Delaware Blue Hens 4-5-6
4 Princeton University Tigers 1 1-2-5 def. Drexel University Dragons 3-4-6
5 Washington College Shoremen 1-2-3 def. Princeton University Tigers 2 4-5-6
6 Queen's University Gaels 1-3-4 def. University of Delaware Blue Hens 2-5-6
7 Drexel University Dragons 1-3-5 def. Washington College Shoremen 2-4-6
8 Queen's University Gaels 1-2-5 def. Princeton University Tigers 1 3-4-6
9 Princeton University Tigers 2 1-3-5 def. University of Delaware Blue Hens 2-4-6
10 Washington College Shoremen 1-2-3 def. Queen's University Gaels 4-5-6
11 Drexel University Dragons 1-2-6 def. Princeton University Tigers 2 3-4-5
12 Princeton University Tigers 1 1-2-4 def. University of Delaware Blue Hens 3-5-6
13 Queen's University Gaels 1-3-4 def. Princeton University Tigers 2 2-5-6
14 Washington College Shoremen 1-3-5 def. Princeton University Tigers 1 2-4-6
15 Drexel University Dragons 1-2-6 def. University of Delaware Blue Hens 3-4-5
16 Princeton University Tigers 2 2-3-5 def. Princeton University Tigers 1 1-4-6
17 Drexel University Dragons 1-2-6 def. Queen's University Gaels 3-4-5
18 Washington College Shoremen 1-3-4 def. University of Delaware Blue Hens 2-5-6
19 Drexel University Dragons 2-3-5 def. Princeton University Tigers 1 1-4-6
20 Princeton University Tigers 2 1-3-6 def. Washington College Shoremen 2-4-5
21 Queen's University Gaels 1-2-3 def. University of Delaware Blue Hens 4-5-6
22 Washington College Shoremen 1-3-5 def. Drexel University Dragons 2-4-6
23 Queen's University Gaels 1-2-5 def. Princeton University Tigers 1 3-4-6
24 Princeton University Tigers 2 1-2-4 def. University of Delaware Blue Hens 3-5-6
25 Washington College Shoremen 1-3-4 def. Queen's University Gaels 2-5-6
26 Drexel University Dragons 1-2-3 def. Princeton University Tigers 2 4-5-6
27 Princeton University Tigers 1 1-2-3 def. University of Delaware Blue Hens 4-5-6

Conditions — 03/02/2024 (8am–6pm)

🌧️Moderate rain
Humidity 93%  ·  Pressure 1020.9 hPa

Temperature

51°F
↑ 55°F   ↓ 45°F
Feels like 48°F

Wind

● from   ▲ toward
6.7 kn
avg  ·  max 10.6 kn
Gusts to 19.6 kn
From NE (48°)

Sky & Precipitation

Cloud cover100% Sunshine0.0 hrs Humidity93% Pressure1020.9 hPa Rain0.80 in

What this breeze does at Washington College — from fleet racing

Breeze: NE about 9 kn (weather reanalysis in the scorer’s units)
In fleet races at Washington College in this breeze: a favourites’ day (+0.05)
Favourites’ conditions: in fleet racing here the results follow the ratings more closely than usual, and the top seeds hold their places.

Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.05 means a rating gap counts about 4% more than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.

Orderliness beyond the fleet at Washington College by wind direction (angle) and speed (rings), fitted surface; dots are labelled regatta-days, ★ this regatta (17 labelled fleet-race days at Washington College).

From the notes

Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.

All notes →