| # | School | Team | Rec. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harvard University | Crimson | 18–3 | |
| 2 | Boston College | Eagles | 0–0 | |
| 3 | College of Charleston | Cougars | 10–11 | |
| 4 | University of Rhode Island | Rams | 10–11 | |
| 5 | U. S. Coast Guard Academy | Bears | 10–11 | |
| 6 | Tufts University | Jumbos | 9–12 | |
| 7 | Tulane University | Green Wave | 8–13 | |
| 8 | Roger Williams University | Hawks | 5–16 |
Each side is the sum of its three boats (the skipper's fleet rating times 0.72 plus a team race offset learned from their past matches, plus the crew's offset and a small experience term) plus the school's team race strength and a home-water edge for the host. The win probability is a logistic function of the difference. The forecast was made before the event: the model was refitted on every match sailed before the first day, with fleet ratings as of the week before.
Fitted on the 27,404 team race matches sailed before 2025-04-12, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 57 of 84 matches (68%) with a log-loss of 0.607 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went poorly for the forecast. Orderliness −0.22 ± 0.24: a typical event, more orderly than 22% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.
For each side, the performance strength is the value that would have made its record least surprising: the strength at which the model's expected wins over exactly these opponents equal the actual wins, with every opponent fixed at its pre-event strength. For a skipper, the same shift is applied only to their boat in the matches they sailed, with team-mates and opponents fixed; team-mates who sailed every match together therefore get the same number. Surprise is in bits: -log2 of the probability of the record at the pre-event strength minus the same at the performance strength. P(this good or better) treats matches as independent coin flips at the model's pre-event probabilities, so it ignores form within the day; read it as a rough guide.
Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.
| Place | School | Strength | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins | Δ | Surprise (bits) | P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | University of Rhode Island | 10.18 | 10.89 | 10–11 | 6.8 | +0.71 | 1.7 | 10% |
| 6 | Tufts University | 10.41 | 10.66 | 9–12 | 7.9 | +0.25 | 0.2 | 38% |
| 3 | College of Charleston | 10.65 | 10.88 | 10–11 | 9.0 | +0.24 | 0.2 | 40% |
| 2 | Boston College | 11.66 | 11.64 | 14–7 | 14.1 | −0.02 | 0.0 | 63% |
| 1 | Harvard University | 12.68 | 12.51 | 18–3 | 18.4 | −0.17 | 0.1 | 75% |
| 8 | Roger Williams University | 9.96 | 9.74 | 5–16 | 5.8 | −0.22 | 0.1 | 74% |
| 7 | Tulane University | 10.78 | 10.33 | 8–13 | 10.0 | −0.45 | 0.7 | 88% |
| 5 | U. S. Coast Guard Academy | 11.18 | 10.73 | 10–11 | 12.0 | −0.45 | 0.7 | 89% |
| Skipper | School | Value | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins | Δ | Surprise (bits) | P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kerem Erkmen | University of Rhode Island | 4.18 | 4.89 | 10–11 | 6.8 | +0.71 | 1.7 | 10% |
| Alex Lech | Boston College | 3.34 | 3.73 | 3–3 | 2.6 | +0.39 | 0.1 | 53% |
| Ben Mueller | Tufts University | 3.56 | 3.81 | 9–12 | 7.9 | +0.25 | 0.2 | 38% |
| Axel Stordahl | College of Charleston | 3.09 | 3.33 | 10–11 | 9.0 | +0.24 | 0.2 | 40% |
| Benjamin Dufour | College of Charleston | 3.63 | 3.87 | 10–11 | 9.0 | +0.24 | 0.2 | 40% |
| Peter Joslin | Boston College | 3.45 | 3.14 | 11–4 | 11.8 | −0.31 | 0.2 | 80% |
| Bradley Whiteway | U. S. Coast Guard Academy | 3.01 | 2.56 | 10–11 | 12.0 | −0.45 | 0.7 | 89% |
Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).
| Team | Rec. | Crimson | Eagles | Cougars | Rams | Bears | Jumbos | Wave | Hawks | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvard University Crimson | 5–2 | ✕ | W | W | L | L | W | W | W | |
| Boston College Eagles | 5–2 | L | ✕ | L | W | W | W | W | W | |
| College of Charleston Cougars | 5–2 | L | W | ✕ | W | W | L | W | W | |
| University of Rhode Island Rams | 3–4 | W | L | L | ✕ | L | W | W | L | |
| U. S. Coast Guard Academy Bears | 3–4 | W | L | L | W | ✕ | W | L | L | |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 2–5 | L | L | W | L | L | ✕ | L | W | |
| Tulane University Green Wave | 3–4 | L | L | L | L | W | W | ✕ | W | |
| Roger Williams University Hawks | 2–5 | L | L | L | W | W | L | L | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Crimson | Eagles | Cougars | Rams | Bears | Jumbos | Wave | Hawks | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvard University Crimson | 6–1 | ✕ | W | W | W | L | W | W | W | |
| Boston College Eagles | 5–2 | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | L | |
| College of Charleston Cougars | 2–5 | L | L | ✕ | L | W | L | L | W | |
| University of Rhode Island Rams | 4–3 | L | L | W | ✕ | W | L | W | W | |
| U. S. Coast Guard Academy Bears | 4–3 | W | L | L | L | ✕ | W | W | W | |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 2–5 | L | L | W | W | L | ✕ | L | L | |
| Tulane University Green Wave | 2–5 | L | L | W | L | L | W | ✕ | L | |
| Roger Williams University Hawks | 3–4 | L | W | L | L | L | W | W | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Crimson | Eagles | Cougars | Rams | Bears | Jumbos | Wave | Hawks | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvard University Crimson | 7–0 | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Boston College Eagles | 4–3 | L | ✕ | W | L | W | L | W | W | |
| College of Charleston Cougars | 3–4 | L | L | ✕ | W | L | W | L | W | |
| University of Rhode Island Rams | 3–4 | L | W | L | ✕ | W | L | L | W | |
| U. S. Coast Guard Academy Bears | 3–4 | L | L | W | L | ✕ | L | W | W | |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 5–2 | L | W | L | W | W | ✕ | W | W | |
| Tulane University Green Wave | 3–4 | L | L | W | W | L | L | ✕ | W | |
| Roger Williams University Hawks | 0–7 | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ |
| # | Winner | Loser | Pos. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Green Wave | 2-3-5 | def. | Jumbos | 1-4-6 | ||
| 2 | Hawks | 1-2-6 | def. | Bears | 3-4-5 | ||
| 3 | Cougars | 2-3-4 | def. | Eagles | 1-5-6 | ||
| 4 | Rams | 2-3-4 | def. | Crimson | 1-5-6 | ||
| 5 | Green Wave | 1-2-5 | def. | Hawks | 3-4-6 | ||
| 6 | Eagles | 1-2-3 | def. | Jumbos | 4-5-6 | ||
| 7 | Bears | 1-4-5 | def. | Rams | 2-3-6 | ||
| 8 | Crimson | 1-2-4 | def. | Cougars | 3-5-6 | ||
| 9 | Eagles | 1-2-3 | def. | Hawks | 4-5-6 | ||
| 10 | Rams | 1-2-6 | def. | Green Wave | 3-4-5 | ||
| 11 | Jumbos | 1-2-5 | def. | Cougars | 3-4-6 | ||
| 12 | Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Crimson | 3-4-6 | ||
| 13 | Eagles | 1-2-6 | def. | Rams | 3-4-5 | ||
| 14 | Cougars | 1-3-6 | def. | Hawks | 2-4-5 | ||
| 15 | Green Wave | 2-3-4 | def. | Bears | 1-5-6 | ||
| 16 | Crimson | 1-2-4 | def. | Jumbos | 3-5-6 | ||
| 17 | Cougars | 1-2-6 | def. | Rams | 3-4-5 | ||
| 18 | Eagles | 1-2-4 | def. | Bears | 3-5-6 | ||
| 19 | Jumbos | 1-2-5 | def. | Hawks | 3-4-6 | ||
| 20 | Crimson | 1-2-5 | def. | Green Wave | 3-4-6 | ||
| 21 | Cougars | 1-2-5 | def. | Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 22 | Rams | 1-3-6 | def. | Jumbos | 2-4-5 | ||
| 23 | Eagles | 1-2-3 | def. | Green Wave | 4-5-6 | ||
| 24 | Crimson | 1-3-4 | def. | Hawks | 2-5-6 | ||
| 25 | Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-6 | ||
| 26 | Cougars | 1-2-3 | def. | Green Wave | 4-5-6 | ||
| 27 | Hawks | 1-2-4 | def. | Rams | 3-5-6 DNF | ||
| 28 | Crimson | 1-2-6 | def. | Eagles | 3-4-5 | ||
| 29 | Green Wave | 1-2-6 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-5 | ||
| 30 | Bears | 1-2-4 | def. | Hawks | 3-5-6 | ||
| 31 | Eagles | 2-3-5 | def. | Cougars | 1-4-6 | ||
| 32 | Crimson | 1-4-5 | def. | Rams | 2-3-6 | ||
| 33 | Hawks | 1-2-5 | def. | Green Wave | 3-4-6 | ||
| 34 | Eagles | 1-2-4 | def. | Jumbos | 3-5-6 | ||
| 35 | Rams | 2-3-4 | def. | Bears | 1-5-6 | ||
| 36 | Crimson | 3-4-5 | def. | Cougars | 1-2-6 DSQ | ||
| 37 | Hawks | 2-3-4 | def. | Eagles | 1-5-6 | ||
| 38 | Rams | 1-2-5 | def. | Green Wave | 3-4-6 | ||
| 39 | Jumbos | 1-2-3 | def. | Cougars | 4-5-6 | ||
| 40 | Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Crimson | 3-4-6 | ||
| 41 | Eagles | 1-2-3 | def. | Rams | 4-5-6 | ||
| 42 | Cougars | 2-3-4 | def. | Hawks | 1-5-6 | ||
| 43 | Bears | 1-2-6 | def. | Green Wave | 3-4-5 | ||
| 44 | Crimson | 1-4-5 | def. | Jumbos | 2-3-6 | ||
| 45 | Rams | 1-2-6 | def. | Cougars | 3-4-5 | ||
| 46 | Eagles | 1-2-3 | def. | Bears | 4-5-6 | ||
| 47 | Hawks | 1-2-6 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-5 | ||
| 48 | Crimson | 1-2-4 | def. | Green Wave | 3-5-6 | ||
| 49 | Cougars | 2-3-4 | def. | Bears | 1-5-6 | ||
| 50 | Jumbos | 1-2-4 | def. | Rams | 3-5-6 | ||
| 51 | Eagles | 1-3-5 | def. | Green Wave | 2-4-6 | ||
| 52 | Crimson | 1-2-3 | def. | Hawks | 4-5-6 | ||
| 53 | Bears | 1-2-6 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-5 | ||
| 54 | Green Wave | 1-2-6 | def. | Cougars | 3-4-5 | ||
| 55 | Rams | 1-4-5 | def. | Hawks | 2-3-6 | ||
| 56 | Crimson | 2-3-5 | def. | Eagles | 1-4-6 | ||
| 57 | Jumbos | 2-3-5 | def. | Green Wave | 1-4-6 | ||
| 58 | Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Hawks | 3-4-6 | ||
| 59 | Eagles | 1-2-4 | def. | Cougars | 3-5-6 | ||
| 60 | Crimson | 2-3-4 | def. | Rams | 1-5-6 | ||
| 61 | Green Wave | 1-2-3 | def. | Hawks | 4-5-6 | ||
| 62 | Jumbos | 2-4-5 | def. | Eagles | 1-3-6 RAF | ||
| 63 | Rams | 1-2-4 | def. | Bears | 3-5-6 DNF | ||
| 64 | Crimson | 1-4-5 | def. | Cougars | 2-3-6 | ||
| 65 | Eagles | 1-4-5 | def. | Hawks | 2-3-6 | ||
| 66 | Green Wave | 1-2-5 | def. | Rams | 3-4-6 | ||
| 67 | Cougars | 2-3-4 | def. | Jumbos | 1-5-6 | ||
| 68 | Crimson | 1-3-4 | def. | Bears | 2-5-6 | ||
| 69 | Rams | 2-3-5 | def. | Eagles | 1-4-6 | ||
| 70 | Cougars | 1-2-5 | def. | Hawks | 3-4-6 | ||
| 71 | Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Green Wave | 3-4-6 | ||
| 72 | Crimson | 1-2-5 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-6 | ||
| 73 | Cougars | 1-2-6 | def. | Rams | 3-4-5 | ||
| 74 | Eagles | 1-2-5 | def. | Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 75 | Jumbos | 1-2-4 | def. | Hawks | 3-5-6 | ||
| 76 | Crimson | 1-2-5 | def. | Green Wave | 3-4-6 | ||
| 77 | Bears | 1-2-3 | def. | Cougars | 4-5-6 | ||
| 78 | Jumbos | 2-3-4 | def. | Rams | 1-5-6 | ||
| 79 | Eagles | 1-2-3 | def. | Green Wave | 4-5-6 | ||
| 80 | Crimson | 1-2-5 | def. | Hawks | 3-4-6 | ||
| 81 | Jumbos | 1-2-3 | def. | Bears | 4-5-6 | ||
| 82 | Green Wave | 1-2-3 | def. | Cougars | 4-5-6 | ||
| 83 | Rams | 1-2-5 | def. | Hawks | 3-4-6 | ||
| 84 | Crimson | 1-2-4 | def. | Eagles | 3-5-6 | ||
Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.20 means a rating gap counts about 18% more than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.
Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.