| # | School | Team | A | TOT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  |
Northeastern University | Huskies 1 | 5 | 5 |
| 2 | |
Northeastern University | Huskies 2 | 10 | 10 |
| 3 |  |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Engineers 2 | 20 | 20 |
| 4 |  |
Boston University | Terriers 1 | 26 | 26 |
| 5 | |
Northeastern University | Huskies 4 | 27 | 27 |
| 6 | |
Northeastern University | Huskies 6 | 36 | 36 |
| 7 | |
Northeastern University | Huskies 5 | 38 | 38 |
| 8 |  |
Emmanuel College | Saints | 41 | 41 |
| 9 |  |
Johnson and Wales University | Wildcats 2 | 48 | 48 |
| 10 | |
Northeastern University | Huskies 3 | 50 | 50 |
| 11 | |
Johnson and Wales University | Wildcats 1 | 54 | 54 |
| 12 | |
Northeastern University | Huskies 7 | 56 | 56 |
| 13 | |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Engineers 1 | 63 | 63 |
| 14 |  |
Wellesley College | Blue 2 | 66 | 66 |
| 15 | |
Boston University | Terriers 2 | 79 | 79 |
| 16 | |
Wellesley College | Blue 1 | 84 | 84 |
| Team | 1A | 2A | 3A | 4A | 5A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boston University Terriers 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Boston University Terriers 2 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 |
| Emmanuel College Saints | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 |
| Johnson and Wales University Wildcats 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 |
| Johnson and Wales University Wildcats 2 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 2 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| Northeastern University Huskies 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Northeastern University Huskies 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Northeastern University Huskies 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Northeastern University Huskies 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Northeastern University Huskies 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Northeastern University Huskies 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Northeastern University Huskies 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Wellesley College Blue 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 |
| Wellesley College Blue 2 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Orderliness is how tightly the finishing order followed the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0). Positive is the favourites’ day: the ratings carried more weight than usual and the top seeds finished where expected. Negative is the underdogs’ day: the fleet compressed and the favourites came back to the pack. A value of ±0.03 means a rating gap counts about 3% less than on a typical day.
The breeze reading is the chart’s value at this regatta’s wind direction and speed (the star): this venue’s pattern of which directions bring order and which bring upsets, with breeze generally orderly and light air surprising. The fleet adjustment comes from the entry list: the stronger and more experienced the fleet, the more surprising the racing. How this is estimated · compare venues.
Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.
