| # | School | Team | Rec. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yale University | Bulldogs | 20–4 | |
| 2 | Jacksonville University | Fins | 14–10 | |
| 3 | College of Charleston | Cougars | 12–12 | |
| 4 | University of South Florida | Bulls | 9–15 | |
| 5 | Eckerd College | Tritons | 5–19 |
Each side is the sum of its three boats (the skipper's fleet rating times 0.72 plus a team race offset learned from their past matches, plus the crew's offset and a small experience term) plus the school's team race strength and a home-water edge for the host. The win probability is a logistic function of the difference. The forecast was made before the event: the model was refitted on every match sailed before the first day, with fleet ratings as of the week before.
Fitted on the 14,251 team race matches sailed before 2020-02-22, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 43 of 60 matches (72%) with a log-loss of 0.549 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went about as expected for the forecast. Orderliness −0.06 ± 0.26: a typical event, more orderly than 36% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.
For each side, the performance strength is the value that would have made its record least surprising: the strength at which the model's expected wins over exactly these opponents equal the actual wins, with every opponent fixed at its pre-event strength. For a skipper, the same shift is applied only to their boat in the matches they sailed, with team-mates and opponents fixed; team-mates who sailed every match together therefore get the same number. Surprise is in bits: -log2 of the probability of the record at the pre-event strength minus the same at the performance strength. P(this good or better) treats matches as independent coin flips at the model's pre-event probabilities, so it ignores form within the day; read it as a rough guide.
Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.
| Place | School | Strength | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins | Δ | Surprise (bits) | P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | University of South Florida | 8.49 | 8.83 | 9–15 | 7.5 | +0.34 | 0.4 | 31% |
| 3 | College of Charleston | 9.11 | 9.26 | 12–12 | 11.3 | +0.16 | 0.1 | 45% |
| 1 | Yale University | 10.56 | 10.68 | 20–4 | 19.6 | +0.12 | 0.0 | 54% |
| 5 | Eckerd College | 8.14 | 8.01 | 5–19 | 5.5 | −0.13 | 0.0 | 68% |
| 2 | Jacksonville University | 9.87 | 9.40 | 14–10 | 16.2 | −0.47 | 0.7 | 90% |
| Skipper | School | Value | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins | Δ | Surprise (bits) | P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christian Koules | University of South Florida | 2.15 | 2.49 | 9–15 | 7.5 | +0.34 | 0.4 | 31% |
| Connor Ratcliff | Eckerd College | 2.48 | 2.35 | 5–19 | 5.5 | −0.13 | 0.0 | 68% |
| Ian Willoughby | Eckerd College | 2.77 | 2.64 | 5–19 | 5.5 | −0.13 | 0.0 | 68% |
| Andre Guaragna | Jacksonville University | 3.02 | 2.56 | 14–10 | 16.2 | −0.47 | 0.7 | 90% |
| Alfonso Garcia Bringas | Jacksonville University | 3.44 | 2.97 | 14–10 | 16.2 | −0.47 | 0.7 | 90% |
Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).
| Team | Rec. | Bulldogs | Fins | Cougars | Bulls | Tritons | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yale University Bulldogs | 3–1 | ✕ | W | L | W | W | |
| Jacksonville University Fins | 2–2 | L | ✕ | W | L | W | |
| College of Charleston Cougars | 2–2 | W | L | ✕ | L | W | |
| University of South Florida Bulls | 3–1 | L | W | W | ✕ | W | |
| Eckerd College Tritons | 0–4 | L | L | L | L | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Bulldogs | Fins | Cougars | Bulls | Tritons | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yale University Bulldogs | 4–0 | ✕ | W | W | W | W | |
| Jacksonville University Fins | 2–2 | L | ✕ | L | W | W | |
| College of Charleston Cougars | 2–2 | L | W | ✕ | L | W | |
| University of South Florida Bulls | 1–3 | L | L | W | ✕ | L | |
| Eckerd College Tritons | 1–3 | L | L | L | W | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Bulldogs | Fins | Cougars | Bulls | Tritons | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yale University Bulldogs | 4–0 | ✕ | W | W | W | W | |
| Jacksonville University Fins | 2–2 | L | ✕ | L | W | W | |
| College of Charleston Cougars | 2–2 | L | W | ✕ | W | L | |
| University of South Florida Bulls | 0–4 | L | L | L | ✕ | L | |
| Eckerd College Tritons | 2–2 | L | L | W | W | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Bulldogs | Fins | Cougars | Bulls | Tritons | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yale University Bulldogs | 3–1 | ✕ | L | W | W | W | |
| Jacksonville University Fins | 2–2 | W | ✕ | W | L | L | |
| College of Charleston Cougars | 2–2 | L | L | ✕ | W | W | |
| University of South Florida Bulls | 2–2 | L | W | L | ✕ | W | |
| Eckerd College Tritons | 1–3 | L | W | L | L | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Bulldogs | Fins | Cougars | Bulls | Tritons | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yale University Bulldogs | 4–0 | ✕ | W | W | W | W | |
| Jacksonville University Fins | 2–2 | L | ✕ | W | L | W | |
| College of Charleston Cougars | 1–3 | L | L | ✕ | L | W | |
| University of South Florida Bulls | 2–2 | L | W | W | ✕ | L | |
| Eckerd College Tritons | 1–3 | L | L | L | W | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Bulldogs | Fins | Cougars | Bulls | Tritons | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yale University Bulldogs | 2–2 | ✕ | L | L | W | W | |
| Jacksonville University Fins | 4–0 | W | ✕ | W | W | W | |
| College of Charleston Cougars | 3–1 | W | L | ✕ | W | W | |
| University of South Florida Bulls | 1–3 | L | L | L | ✕ | W | |
| Eckerd College Tritons | 0–4 | L | L | L | L | ✕ |
| # | Winner | Loser | Pos. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cougars | 1-2-5 | def. | Tritons | 3-4-6 | ||
| 2 | Bulls | 1-2-6 | def. | Fins | 3-4-5 | ||
| 3 | Cougars | 1-2-6 | def. | Bulldogs | 3-4-5 | ||
| 4 | Fins | 2-3-4 | def. | Tritons | 1-5-6 | ||
| 5 | Bulldogs | 1-2-5 | def. | Bulls | 3-4-6 | ||
| 6 | Fins | 1-4-5 | def. | Cougars | 2-3-6 | ||
| 7 | Bulldogs | 1-2-5 | def. | Tritons | 3-4-6 | ||
| 8 | Bulls | 1-2-6 | def. | Cougars | 3-4-5 | ||
| 9 | Bulldogs | 1-2-4 | def. | Fins | 3-5-6 | ||
| 10 | Bulls | 1-2-5 | def. | Tritons | 3-4-6 | ||
| 11 | Cougars | 2-3-5 | def. | Tritons | 1-4-6 | ||
| 12 | Fins | 1-2-5 | def. | Bulls | 3-4-6 | ||
| 13 | Bulldogs | 1-4-5 | def. | Cougars | 2-3-6 | ||
| 14 | Fins | 1-2-6 | def. | Tritons | 3-4-5 | ||
| 15 | Bulldogs | 1-2-4 | def. | Bulls | 3-5-6 | ||
| 16 | Cougars | 1-2-6 | def. | Fins | 3-4-5 | ||
| 17 | Bulldogs | 1-2-4 | def. | Tritons | 3-5-6 | ||
| 18 | Bulls | 1-4-5 | def. | Cougars | 2-3-6 | ||
| 19 | Bulldogs | 1-2-5 | def. | Fins | 3-4-6 | ||
| 20 | Tritons | 1-2-4 | def. | Bulls | 3-5-6 | ||
| 21 | Tritons | 1-2-6 | def. | Cougars | 3-4-5 | ||
| 22 | Fins | 1-2-5 | def. | Bulls | 3-4-6 | ||
| 23 | Bulldogs | 1-2-5 | def. | Cougars | 3-4-6 | ||
| 24 | Fins | 1-2-6 | def. | Tritons | 3-4-5 | ||
| 25 | Bulldogs | 1-2-3 | def. | Bulls | 4-5-6 | ||
| 26 | Cougars | 1-2-6 | def. | Fins | 3-4-5 | ||
| 27 | Bulldogs | 2-3-4 | def. | Tritons | 1-5-6 | ||
| 28 | Cougars | 1-2-3 | def. | Bulls | 4-5-6 | ||
| 29 | Bulldogs | 1-2-5 | def. | Fins | 3-4-6 | ||
| 30 | Tritons | 1-2-3 | def. | Bulls | 4-5-6 | ||
| 31 | Cougars | 1-2-3 | def. | Tritons | 4-5-6 | ||
| 32 | Bulls | 1-2-4 | def. | Fins | 3-5-6 | ||
| 33 | Bulldogs | 1-2-5 | def. | Cougars | 3-4-6 | ||
| 34 | Tritons | 1-3-5 | def. | Fins | 2-4-6 | ||
| 35 | Bulldogs | 1-2-5 | def. | Bulls | 3-4-6 | ||
| 36 | Fins | 1-2-5 | def. | Cougars | 3-4-6 | ||
| 37 | Bulldogs | 1-2-5 | def. | Tritons | 3-4-6 | ||
| 38 | Cougars | 2-3-5 | def. | Bulls | 1-4-6 | ||
| 39 | Fins | 1-2-6 | def. | Bulldogs | 3-4-5 | ||
| 40 | Bulls | 1-2-6 | def. | Tritons | 3-4-5 | ||
| 41 | Cougars | 2-3-5 | def. | Tritons | 1-4-6 | ||
| 42 | Bulls | 2-3-5 | def. | Fins | 1-4-6 | ||
| 43 | Bulldogs | 1-2-4 | def. | Cougars | 3-5-6 | ||
| 44 | Fins | 2-3-5 | def. | Tritons | 1-4-6 | ||
| 45 | Bulldogs | 1-2-4 | def. | Bulls | 3-5-6 | ||
| 46 | Fins | 1-2-3 | def. | Cougars | 4-5-6 | ||
| 47 | Bulldogs | 1-2-5 | def. | Tritons | 3-4-6 | ||
| 48 | Bulls | 1-3-6 | def. | Cougars | 2-4-5 | ||
| 49 | Bulldogs | 1-2-5 | def. | Fins | 3-4-6 | ||
| 50 | Tritons | 1-3-4 | def. | Bulls | 2-5-6 | ||
| 51 | Cougars | 1-2-6 | def. | Tritons | 3-4-5 | ||
| 52 | Fins | 1-2-5 | def. | Bulls | 3-4-6 | ||
| 53 | Cougars | 1-2-5 | def. | Bulldogs | 3-4-6 | ||
| 54 | Fins | 2-3-5 | def. | Tritons | 1-4-6 | ||
| 55 | Bulldogs | 1-2-4 | def. | Bulls | 3-5-6 | ||
| 56 | Fins | 1-2-6 | def. | Cougars | 3-4-5 | ||
| 57 | Bulldogs | 2-3-4 | def. | Tritons | 1-5-6 | ||
| 58 | Cougars | 2-3-4 | def. | Bulls | 1-5-6 | ||
| 59 | Fins | 2-3-4 | def. | Bulldogs | 1-5-6 | ||
| 60 | Bulls | 1-2-4 | def. | Tritons | 3-5-6 | ||
| School | Team | Skippers | Crew | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yale University | Bulldogs | Christine Klingler '20 Louisa Nordstrom '20 Nicholas Marwell '21 |
Meredith Ryan '23 Claudia Loiacono '21 Helena Ware '23 Anisha Arcot '23 |
|
| Jacksonville University | Fins | Alfonso Garcia Bringas '21 Andre Guaragna '21 Telmo Basterra '21 |
Grace Benzal '23 Madison Reynolds '21 Mia Porter '22 |
|
| College of Charleston | Cougars | Brandon Geller '23 Jack Howard '23 James Whitmore '20 |
Anna Sherry '23 Elizabeth Dipietro '23 Mary Morano '21 |
|
| University of South Florida | Bulls | Christian Koules '21 Kathryn Bornarth '21 Marina Barzaghi '21 |
Lexie Foos '22 John Monahan '20 Samantha Kappaz '21 Carolina Perez Rovira '22 |
|
| Eckerd College | Tritons | Connor Ratcliff '21 Daniel Vail '21 Ian Willoughby '21 |
Camryn Kennedy '21 Liam Farese '22 Jackie Morrison '23 |
Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.07 means a rating gap counts about 6% more than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.
Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.