Team Race Invite 2 at Brown

# SchoolTeam Rec.
1 Brown University Brown University Bears 1 9–0
2 Tufts University Tufts University Jumbos 1 4–5
3 Tufts University Tufts University Jumbos 2 3–6
4 Brown University Brown University Bears 2 2–7

Pre-event forecast

Fitted on the 15,718 team race matches sailed before 2021-05-14, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 14 of 18 matches (78%) with a log-loss of 0.426 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went well for the forecast. Orderliness +0.37 ± 0.45: a typical event, more orderly than 81% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.

PlaceSchool Pred. Strength Boats (skipper / crew, boat value) Pred. win % Recordvs forecast
1Brown University
Bears 1
110.26
school +0.23, home +0.34
Jack Murphy / Madeleine Mcgrath 3.41
Tucker Weed / Madeleine Montagner 2.90
Olivia Belda / Annabelle Hutchinson 3.36 6–0
Olivia Belda / Emma Montgomery 3.39 3–0
82%9–0 (100%)+1.6
2Tufts University
Jumbos 1
29.43
school +0.17
Charlie Hibben / Celia Byrne 3.02
Alex Fasolo / Juliana Testa 3.02
Samuel Merson / Ann Sheridan 3.19
62%4–5 (44%)−1.6
3Tufts University
Jumbos 2
38.28
school +0.17
Connor Sheridan / Amelia Carlson 2.67
Patrick Mulcahy / George Sidamon-Eristoff
Trevor Davis / Lindsay Powers
30%3–6 (33%)+0.3
4Brown University
Bears 2
48.11
school +0.23, home +0.34
Hunter Zonnenberg / Catherine Mcclenahan 2.35
Elizabeth Rolfes / Mo Liu 2.19
Caroline Bayless / Nora Ong 2.98
26%2–7 (22%)−0.3

Surprisal: who beat their rating

Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.

PlaceSchoolStrength Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
1Brown University Bears 110.2613.269–07.4≥+3.002.516%
3Tufts University Jumbos 28.288.453–62.7+0.170.056%
4Brown University Bears 28.117.902–72.3−0.210.073%
2Tufts University Jumbos 19.438.574–55.6−0.871.094%

By skipper

SkipperSchoolValue Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
Olivia BeldaBrown University3.366.369–07.4≥+3.002.516%
Patrick MulcahyTufts University2.282.453–62.7+0.170.056%
Charlie HibbenTufts University3.022.154–55.6−0.871.094%
Alex FasoloTufts University3.022.164–55.6−0.871.094%

Match by match

Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).

Rd#WinnerLoser P(winner)
11Tufts University Jumbos 1Brown University Bears 279%
12Brown University Bears 1Tufts University Jumbos 289%
13Brown University Bears 2Tufts University Jumbos 248%upset
14Brown University Bears 1Tufts University Jumbos 169%
15Tufts University Jumbos 1Tufts University Jumbos 277%
16Brown University Bears 1Brown University Bears 290%
27Tufts University Jumbos 1Brown University Bears 279%
28Brown University Bears 1Tufts University Jumbos 288%
29Brown University Bears 2Tufts University Jumbos 245%upset
210Brown University Bears 1Tufts University Jumbos 169%
211Tufts University Jumbos 2Tufts University Jumbos 125%upset
212Brown University Bears 1Brown University Bears 290%
313Tufts University Jumbos 1Brown University Bears 279%
314Brown University Bears 1Tufts University Jumbos 287%
315Tufts University Jumbos 2Brown University Bears 256%
316Brown University Bears 1Tufts University Jumbos 169%
317Tufts University Jumbos 2Tufts University Jumbos 125%upset
318Brown University Bears 1Brown University Bears 290%

Round 1

TeamRec.1122
Brown University Bears 14–2✕WW✕
Tufts University Jumbos 12–4L✕✕L
Tufts University Jumbos 22–4L✕✕L
Brown University Bears 24–2✕WW✕

Round 2

TeamRec.1122
Brown University Bears 14–2✕WW✕
Tufts University Jumbos 12–4L✕✕L
Tufts University Jumbos 22–4L✕✕L
Brown University Bears 24–2✕WW✕

Round 3

TeamRec.1122
Brown University Bears 13–3✕WW✕
Tufts University Jumbos 13–3L✕✕L
Tufts University Jumbos 23–3L✕✕L
Brown University Bears 23–3✕WW✕
# Winner Loser Pos.
1 Tufts University Jumbos 1 1-2-3 def. Brown University Bears 2 4-5-6
2 Brown University Bears 1 1-2-5 def. Tufts University Jumbos 2 3-4-6
3 Brown University Bears 2 1-2-5 def. Tufts University Jumbos 2 3-4-6
4 Brown University Bears 1 1-2-6 def. Tufts University Jumbos 1 3-4-5
5 Tufts University Jumbos 1 2-3-4 def. Tufts University Jumbos 2 1-5-6
6 Brown University Bears 1 1-2-6 def. Brown University Bears 2 3-4-5
7 Tufts University Jumbos 1 1-2-4 def. Brown University Bears 2 3-5-6
8 Brown University Bears 1 1-2-3 def. Tufts University Jumbos 2 4-5-6
9 Brown University Bears 2 1-2-4 def. Tufts University Jumbos 2 3-5-6
10 Brown University Bears 1 1-2-5 def. Tufts University Jumbos 1 3-4-6
11 Tufts University Jumbos 2 1-3-6 def. Tufts University Jumbos 1 2-4-5
12 Brown University Bears 1 1-2-5 def. Brown University Bears 2 3-4-6
13 Tufts University Jumbos 1 1-2-6 def. Brown University Bears 2 3-4-5
14 Brown University Bears 1 1-2-5 def. Tufts University Jumbos 2 3-4-6
15 Tufts University Jumbos 2 1-2-5 def. Brown University Bears 2 3-4-6
16 Brown University Bears 1 1-2-5 def. Tufts University Jumbos 1 3-4-6
17 Tufts University Jumbos 2 1-3-6 def. Tufts University Jumbos 1 2-4-5
18 Brown University Bears 1 1-2-5 def. Brown University Bears 2 3-4-6

Conditions — 05/14/2021 (8am–6pm)

🌤️Mainly clear
Humidity 34%  ·  Pressure 1021.4 hPa

Temperature

69°F
↑ 72°F   ↓ 60°F
Feels like 65°F

Wind

● from   ▲ toward
5.0 kn
avg  ·  max 5.4 kn
Gusts to 15.6 kn
From NW (315°)

Sky & Precipitation

Cloud cover28% Sunshine11.0 hrs Humidity34% Pressure1021.4 hPa

What this breeze does at Brown — from fleet racing

Breeze: NW about 8 kn (weather reanalysis in the scorer’s units)
In fleet races at Brown in this breeze: an underdogs’ day (−0.07)
Underdogs’ conditions: in fleet racing here the fleet bunches up and lower-rated boats beat the seeds more often than usual.

Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.07 means a rating gap counts about 6% less than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.

Orderliness beyond the fleet at Brown by wind direction (angle) and speed (rings), fitted surface; dots are labelled regatta-days, ★ this regatta (78 labelled fleet-race days at Brown).

From the notes

Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.

All notes →