Finger Lakes Women's Team Race

# SchoolTeam Rec.
1 Cornell University Cornell University Big Red 11–1
2 University of Pennsylvania University of Pennsylvania Quakers 7–5
3 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Hobart and William Smith Colleges Herons 4–8
4 U. S. Naval Academy U. S. Naval Academy Women 2–10

Pre-event forecast

Fitted on the 20,646 team race matches sailed before 2023-04-01, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 20 of 24 matches (83%) with a log-loss of 0.499 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went about as expected for the forecast. Orderliness −0.04 ± 0.37: a typical event, more orderly than 38% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.

PlaceSchool Pred. Strength Boats (skipper / crew, boat value) Pred. win % Recordvs forecast
1Cornell University
Big Red
18.87
school −0.17, home +0.41
Bridget Green / Gabbi Delbello 3.36
Meredith Moran / Sophia Pearce 2.65 8–0
J.J. Smith / Amelia Neumann 2.60 8–0
Meredith Moran / Amelia Neumann 2.56 3–1
J.J. Smith / Lucija Ruzevic 2.65 3–1
88%11–1 (92%)+0.5
2University of Pennsylvania
Quakers
27.43
school +0.34
Torrey Chisari / Hannah Bast 2.73
Madeleine Rice / Anna Hoffman 2.43
Adra Ivancich / Kiki Bruzzi
53%7–5 (58%)+0.6
3Hobart and William Smith Colleges
Herons
46.00
school +0.14
Heather Kerns / Frances Depke 2.29
Brook Wood / Valyn Mogensen 1.84 3–5
Elizabeth Starck / Ksenia Lowry-Neufeld 1.71 3–5
Brook Wood / Ksenia Lowry-Neufeld 1.83 1–3
Elizabeth Starck / Laura Therien 1.69 1–3
18%4–8 (33%)+1.9
4U. S. Naval Academy
Women
37.00
school +0.34
Aubin Hattendorf / Catherine Aitken 1.75
Ava Farley / Linnea Forsberg 2.11
Eva Blauvelt / Julia Christie 2.77
42%2–10 (17%)−3.0

Surprisal: who beat their rating

Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.

PlaceSchoolStrength Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
3Hobart and William Smith Colleges6.006.944–82.1+0.941.414%
1Cornell University8.879.3311–110.5+0.460.255%
2University of Pennsylvania7.437.717–56.4+0.280.148%
4U. S. Naval Academy7.005.412–105.0−1.583.299%

By skipper

SkipperSchoolValue Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
Torrey ChisariUniversity of Pennsylvania2.733.007–56.4+0.280.148%
Madeleine RiceUniversity of Pennsylvania2.432.707–56.4+0.280.148%
Adra IvancichUniversity of Pennsylvania1.902.177–56.4+0.280.148%
Aubin HattendorfU. S. Naval Academy1.750.162–105.0−1.583.299%
Ava FarleyU. S. Naval Academy2.110.532–105.0−1.583.299%
Eva BlauveltU. S. Naval Academy2.771.182–105.0−1.583.299%

Match by match

Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).

Rd#WinnerLoser P(winner)
1U. S. Naval AcademyHobart and William Smith Colleges73%
2Cornell UniversityUniversity of Pennsylvania81%
3University of PennsylvaniaHobart and William Smith Colleges81%
4Cornell UniversityU. S. Naval Academy87%
5University of PennsylvaniaU. S. Naval Academy61%
6Cornell UniversityHobart and William Smith Colleges95%
7U. S. Naval AcademyHobart and William Smith Colleges73%
8Cornell UniversityUniversity of Pennsylvania81%
9Hobart and William Smith CollegesUniversity of Pennsylvania20%upset
10Cornell UniversityU. S. Naval Academy87%
11University of PennsylvaniaU. S. Naval Academy61%
12Hobart and William Smith CollegesCornell University5%upset
13Hobart and William Smith CollegesU. S. Naval Academy27%upset
14Cornell UniversityUniversity of Pennsylvania81%
15University of PennsylvaniaHobart and William Smith Colleges80%
16Cornell UniversityU. S. Naval Academy87%
17University of PennsylvaniaU. S. Naval Academy61%
18Cornell UniversityHobart and William Smith Colleges95%
19Hobart and William Smith CollegesU. S. Naval Academy28%upset
20Cornell UniversityUniversity of Pennsylvania81%
21University of PennsylvaniaHobart and William Smith Colleges80%
22Cornell UniversityU. S. Naval Academy87%
23University of PennsylvaniaU. S. Naval Academy61%
24Cornell UniversityHobart and William Smith Colleges95%

Round 0

TeamRec.RedQuakersHeronsWomen
Cornell University Big Red11–1✕WWW
University of Pennsylvania Quakers7–5L✕WW
Hobart and William Smith Colleges Herons4–8LL✕W
U. S. Naval Academy Women2–10LLL✕
# Winner Loser Pos.
1 U. S. Naval Academy Women 1-2-4 def. Hobart and William Smith Colleges Herons 3-5-6
2 Cornell University Big Red 1-2-6 def. University of Pennsylvania Quakers 3-4-5
3 University of Pennsylvania Quakers 1-2-5 def. Hobart and William Smith Colleges Herons 3-4-6
4 Cornell University Big Red 1-2-6 def. U. S. Naval Academy Women 3-4-5
5 University of Pennsylvania Quakers 1-2-6 def. U. S. Naval Academy Women 3-4-5
6 Cornell University Big Red 1-2-4 def. Hobart and William Smith Colleges Herons 3-5-6
7 U. S. Naval Academy Women 1-3-4 def. Hobart and William Smith Colleges Herons 2-5-6
8 Cornell University Big Red 1-2-5 def. University of Pennsylvania Quakers 3-4-6
9 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Herons 1-3-6 def. University of Pennsylvania Quakers 2-4-5
10 Cornell University Big Red 1-2-4 def. U. S. Naval Academy Women 3-5-6
11 University of Pennsylvania Quakers 1-2-4 def. U. S. Naval Academy Women 3-5-6
12 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Herons 1-4-5 def. Cornell University Big Red 2-3-6
13 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Herons 1-2-4 def. U. S. Naval Academy Women 3-5-6
14 Cornell University Big Red 1-2-5 def. University of Pennsylvania Quakers 3-4-6
15 University of Pennsylvania Quakers 1-3-4 def. Hobart and William Smith Colleges Herons 2-5-6
16 Cornell University Big Red 1-2-6 def. U. S. Naval Academy Women 3-4-5
17 University of Pennsylvania Quakers 2-3-4 def. U. S. Naval Academy Women 1-5-6
18 Cornell University Big Red 1-3-5 def. Hobart and William Smith Colleges Herons 2-4-6
19 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Herons 1-2-5 def. U. S. Naval Academy Women 3-4-6
20 Cornell University Big Red 2-3-4 def. University of Pennsylvania Quakers 1-5-6
21 University of Pennsylvania Quakers 1-2-6 def. Hobart and William Smith Colleges Herons 3-4-5
22 Cornell University Big Red 1-2-4 def. U. S. Naval Academy Women 3-5-6
23 University of Pennsylvania Quakers 1-2-5 def. U. S. Naval Academy Women 3-4-6
24 Cornell University Big Red 1-2-5 def. Hobart and William Smith Colleges Herons 3-4-6

Conditions — 04/01/2023 (8am–6pm)

🌦️Light drizzle
Humidity 56%  ·  Pressure 993.9 hPa

Temperature

60°F
↑ 69°F   ↓ 49°F
Feels like 54°F

Wind

● from   ▲ toward
10.6 kn
avg  ·  max 15.1 kn
Gusts to 35.0 kn
From SW (227°)

Sky & Precipitation

Cloud cover60% Sunshine7.1 hrs Humidity56% Pressure993.9 hPa Rain0.08 in

What this breeze does at Cornell — from fleet racing

Breeze: SW about 12 kn (weather reanalysis in the scorer’s units)
In fleet races at Cornell in this breeze: a favourites’ day (+0.02)
Favourites’ conditions: in fleet racing here the results follow the ratings more closely than usual, and the top seeds hold their places.

Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.02 means a rating gap counts about 2% more than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.

Orderliness beyond the fleet at Cornell by wind direction (angle) and speed (rings), fitted surface; dots are labelled regatta-days, ★ this regatta (70 labelled fleet-race days at Cornell).

From the notes

Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.

All notes →