| # | School | Team | Rec. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yale University | Bulldogs | 14–4 | |
| 2 | Dartmouth College | Big Green | 12–6 | |
| 3 | Stanford University | Cardinal | 11–7 | |
| 4 | Brown University | Bears | 10–8 | |
| 5 | Bowdoin College | Polar Bears | 9–9 | |
| 6 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Engineers | 7–11 | |
| 7 | Connecticut College | Camels | 0–18 |
Each side is the sum of its three boats (the skipper's fleet rating times 0.72 plus a team race offset learned from their past matches, plus the crew's offset and a small experience term) plus the school's team race strength and a home-water edge for the host. The win probability is a logistic function of the difference. The forecast was made before the event: the model was refitted on every match sailed before the first day, with fleet ratings as of the week before.
Fitted on the 27,404 team race matches sailed before 2025-04-12, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 45 of 63 matches (71%) with a log-loss of 0.528 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went about as expected for the forecast. Orderliness −0.20 ± 0.24: a typical event, more orderly than 24% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.
For each side, the performance strength is the value that would have made its record least surprising: the strength at which the model's expected wins over exactly these opponents equal the actual wins, with every opponent fixed at its pre-event strength. For a skipper, the same shift is applied only to their boat in the matches they sailed, with team-mates and opponents fixed; team-mates who sailed every match together therefore get the same number. Surprise is in bits: -log2 of the probability of the record at the pre-event strength minus the same at the performance strength. P(this good or better) treats matches as independent coin flips at the model's pre-event probabilities, so it ignores form within the day; read it as a rough guide.
Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.
| Place | School | Strength | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins | Δ | Surprise (bits) | P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Bowdoin College | 10.18 | 11.04 | 9–9 | 6.2 | +0.86 | 1.8 | 9% |
| 2 | Dartmouth College | 11.19 | 11.77 | 12–6 | 10.1 | +0.58 | 0.8 | 22% |
| 1 | Yale University | 11.86 | 12.28 | 14–4 | 12.8 | +0.42 | 0.3 | 36% |
| 6 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | 10.18 | 10.28 | 7–11 | 6.7 | +0.10 | 0.0 | 54% |
| 4 | Brown University | 11.35 | 11.09 | 10–8 | 10.9 | −0.26 | 0.2 | 78% |
| 3 | Stanford University | 12.45 | 11.10 | 11–7 | 15.0 | −1.35 | 4.1 | >99% |
| 7 | Connecticut College | 8.41 | 5.41 | 0–18 | 1.3 | ≤−3.00 | 1.9 | >99% |
| Skipper | School | Value | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins | Δ | Surprise (bits) | P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelangelo Vecchio | Bowdoin College | 2.89 | 4.48 | 3–3 | 1.3 | +1.59 | 2.0 | 11% |
| Thibault Antonietti | Bowdoin College | 3.40 | 4.26 | 9–9 | 6.2 | +0.86 | 1.8 | 9% |
| Alex Adams | Yale University | 3.03 | 3.44 | 14–4 | 12.8 | +0.42 | 0.3 | 36% |
| William Hurd | Connecticut College | 2.52 | -0.48 | 0–9 | 1.0 | ≤−3.00 | 1.5 | >99% |
Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).
| Team | Rec. | Bulldogs | Green | Cardinal | Bears | Bears | Engineers | Camels | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yale University Bulldogs | 5–1 | ✕ | W | W | L | W | W | W | |
| Dartmouth College Big Green | 3–3 | L | ✕ | W | L | W | L | W | |
| Stanford University Cardinal | 4–2 | L | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | |
| Brown University Bears | 4–2 | W | W | L | ✕ | W | L | W | |
| Bowdoin College Polar Bears | 2–4 | L | L | L | L | ✕ | W | W | |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers | 3–3 | L | W | L | W | L | ✕ | W | |
| Connecticut College Camels | 0–6 | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Bulldogs | Green | Cardinal | Bears | Bears | Engineers | Camels | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yale University Bulldogs | 4–2 | ✕ | L | W | W | L | W | W | |
| Dartmouth College Big Green | 6–0 | W | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Stanford University Cardinal | 3–3 | L | L | ✕ | W | L | W | W | |
| Brown University Bears | 2–4 | L | L | L | ✕ | L | W | W | |
| Bowdoin College Polar Bears | 4–2 | W | L | W | W | ✕ | L | W | |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers | 2–4 | L | L | L | L | W | ✕ | W | |
| Connecticut College Camels | 0–6 | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Bulldogs | Green | Cardinal | Bears | Bears | Engineers | Camels | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yale University Bulldogs | 5–1 | ✕ | W | W | W | W | L | W | |
| Dartmouth College Big Green | 3–3 | L | ✕ | L | L | W | W | W | |
| Stanford University Cardinal | 4–2 | L | W | ✕ | L | W | W | W | |
| Brown University Bears | 4–2 | L | W | W | ✕ | L | W | W | |
| Bowdoin College Polar Bears | 3–3 | L | L | L | W | ✕ | W | W | |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers | 2–4 | W | L | L | L | L | ✕ | W | |
| Connecticut College Camels | 0–6 | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ |
| # | Winner | Loser | Pos. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Big Green | 1-2-5 | def. | Camels | 3-4-6 | ||
| 2 | Engineers | 1-3-6 | def. | Bears | 2-4-5 | ||
| 3 | Cardinal | 1-2-4 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-5-6 | ||
| 4 | Bulldogs | 1-2-5 | def. | Camels | 3-4-6 | ||
| 5 | Bears | 1-3-4 | def. | Big Green | 2-5-6 | ||
| 6 | Polar Bears | 1-2-4 | def. | Engineers | 3-5-6 | ||
| 7 | Bulldogs | 1-2-3 | def. | Cardinal | 4-5-6 | ||
| 8 | Bears | 1-2-3 | def. | Camels | 4-5-6 | ||
| 9 | Big Green | 1-2-4 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-5-6 | ||
| 10 | Cardinal | 1-2-3 | def. | Engineers | 4-5-6 | ||
| 11 | Bears | 1-2-6 | def. | Bulldogs | 3-4-5 | ||
| 12 | Polar Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Camels | 3-4-6 | ||
| 13 | Big Green | 1-2-6 | def. | Cardinal | 3-4-5 | ||
| 14 | Bulldogs | 1-2-4 | def. | Engineers | 3-5-6 | ||
| 15 | Bears | 1-4-5 | def. | Polar Bears | 2-3-6 | ||
| 16 | Cardinal | 1-2-3 | def. | Camels | 4-5-6 | ||
| 17 | Engineers | 1-2-5 | def. | Big Green | 3-4-6 | ||
| 18 | Bulldogs | 2-3-4 | def. | Polar Bears | 1-5-6 | ||
| 19 | Cardinal | 1-3-4 | def. | Bears | 2-5-6 | ||
| 20 | Engineers | 1-2-5 | def. | Camels | 3-4-6 | ||
| 21 | Bulldogs | 2-3-4 | def. | Big Green | 1-5-6 | ||
| 22 | Big Green | 1-2-5 | def. | Camels | 3-4-6 | ||
| 23 | Bears | 1-3-5 | def. | Engineers | 2-4-6 | ||
| 24 | Polar Bears | 1-3-6 | def. | Cardinal | 2-4-5 | ||
| 25 | Bulldogs | 2-3-4 | def. | Camels | 1-5-6 | ||
| 26 | Big Green | 1-2-6 | def. | Bears | 3-4-5 | ||
| 27 | Engineers | 1-2-6 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-4-5 | ||
| 28 | Bulldogs | 1-3-5 | def. | Cardinal | 2-4-6 | ||
| 29 | Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Camels | 3-4-6 | ||
| 30 | Big Green | 2-3-4 | def. | Polar Bears | 1-5-6 | ||
| 31 | Cardinal | 1-2-5 | def. | Engineers | 3-4-6 | ||
| 32 | Bulldogs | 1-2-5 | def. | Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 33 | Polar Bears | 2-3-4 | def. | Camels | 1-5-6 | ||
| 34 | Big Green | 2-3-4 | def. | Cardinal | 1-5-6 | ||
| 35 | Bulldogs | 1-2-5 | def. | Engineers | 3-4-6 | ||
| 36 | Polar Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 37 | Cardinal | 1-2-5 | def. | Camels | 3-4-6 | ||
| 38 | Big Green | 2-3-4 | def. | Engineers | 1-5-6 | ||
| 39 | Polar Bears | 1-3-5 | def. | Bulldogs | 2-4-6 | ||
| 40 | Cardinal | 1-2-4 | def. | Bears | 3-5-6 | ||
| 41 | Engineers | 1-3-4 | def. | Camels | 2-5-6 | ||
| 42 | Big Green | 1-2-5 | def. | Bulldogs | 3-4-6 | ||
| 43 | Big Green | 1-2-6 | def. | Camels | 3-4-5 | ||
| 44 | Bears | 1-2-6 | def. | Engineers | 3-4-5 | ||
| 45 | Cardinal | 2-3-4 | def. | Polar Bears | 1-5-6 | ||
| 46 | Bulldogs | 2-3-5 | def. | Camels | 1-4-6 | ||
| 47 | Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Big Green | 3-4-6 | ||
| 48 | Polar Bears | 1-2-6 | def. | Engineers | 3-4-5 | ||
| 49 | Bulldogs | 1-2-4 | def. | Cardinal | 3-5-6 | ||
| 50 | Bears | 1-2-3 | def. | Camels | 4-5-6 | ||
| 51 | Big Green | 1-2-6 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-4-5 | ||
| 52 | Cardinal | 1-2-5 | def. | Engineers | 3-4-6 | ||
| 53 | Bulldogs | 1-2-4 | def. | Bears | 3-5-6 | ||
| 54 | Polar Bears | 1-3-4 | def. | Camels | 2-5-6 | ||
| 55 | Cardinal | 1-2-5 | def. | Big Green | 3-4-6 | ||
| 56 | Engineers | 1-2-4 | def. | Bulldogs | 3-5-6 | ||
| 57 | Polar Bears | 1-2-6 | def. | Bears | 3-4-5 | ||
| 58 | Cardinal | 1-2-4 | def. | Camels | 3-5-6 | ||
| 59 | Big Green | 2-3-5 | def. | Engineers | 1-4-6 | ||
| 60 | Bulldogs | 1-2-5 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 61 | Bears | 1-2-4 | def. | Cardinal | 3-5-6 | ||
| 62 | Engineers | 1-2-4 | def. | Camels | 3-5-6 | ||
| 63 | Bulldogs | 1-2-6 | def. | Big Green | 3-4-5 | ||
Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.02 means a rating gap counts about 2% more than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.
Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.