MCSA Open Team Race Qualifier

# SchoolTeam Rec.
1 Northwestern University Northwestern University Wildcats 10–0
2 University of Michigan University of Michigan Wolverines 8–2
3 University of Wisconsin University of Wisconsin Badgers 6–4
4 University of Notre Dame University of Notre Dame Fighting Irish 4–6
5 University of Chicago University of Chicago Maroons 2–8
6 Purdue University Purdue University Boilermakers 0–10

Pre-event forecast

Fitted on the 30,694 team race matches sailed before 2026-04-10, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 28 of 30 matches (93%) with a log-loss of 0.210 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went well for the forecast. Orderliness +0.38 ± 0.33: an orderly event, more orderly than 82% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.

PlaceSchool Pred. Strength Boats (skipper / crew, boat value) Pred. win % Recordvs forecast
1Northwestern University
Wildcats
16.96Jake Weinstein / Cora Star 2.59
Nicholas Chesemore / Samantha Forgosh 2.34
Gavin Eskilson / Miranda Beitel 2.02
82%10–0 (100%)+1.8
2University of Michigan
Wolverines
36.13
school +0.12
Jack Hammett / Ben Visco 1.55
Jack Homa / Alexander Reynolds 1.92
Lorenzo Puertas / Grace Redner 2.50
67%8–2 (80%)+1.3
3University of Wisconsin
Badgers
26.89
school −0.09, home +0.34
Abe Weston / Paige Kurtenbach
Charlie Herrick / Jenna Princing 2.32
Quinn Kaiser / Katherine Ahlquist 2.06
81%6–4 (60%)−2.1
4University of Notre Dame
Fighting Irish
44.74
school −0.67
Timothy Hesse / Sara Corbett 2.01
Michael Cyrul / Joseph Opferman 1.71
Payden Pittman / Jack O'Connor 1.62
43%4–6 (40%)−0.3
5University of Chicago
Maroons
53.20Eliot Hack / Tomas Lopez-Valcarcel
James Leavitt / Amber Thorland
Max Naseef / Alex Strassberg Alonso
22%2–8 (20%)−0.2
6Purdue University
Boilermakers
61.57
school −0.24
Christopher Draper / Annette Wadley
Gavin Holmes / Hadley Zeller
Olivia Degrella / Charlotte Bach
4%0–10 (0%)−0.5

Surprisal: who beat their rating

Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.

PlaceSchoolStrength Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
1Northwestern University6.969.9610–08.2≥+3.003.110%
2University of Michigan6.137.148–26.7+1.020.924%
5University of Chicago3.202.882–82.2−0.330.183%
4University of Notre Dame4.744.404–64.3−0.340.181%
3University of Wisconsin6.895.346–48.1−1.562.499%
6Purdue University1.57-1.430–100.4≤−3.000.7>99%

By skipper

SkipperSchoolValue Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
Jake WeinsteinNorthwestern University2.595.5910–08.2≥+3.003.110%
Nicholas ChesemoreNorthwestern University2.345.3410–08.2≥+3.003.110%
Gavin EskilsonNorthwestern University2.025.0210–08.2≥+3.003.110%
Jack HammettUniversity of Michigan1.552.578–26.7+1.020.924%
Jack HomaUniversity of Michigan1.922.938–26.7+1.020.924%
Lorenzo PuertasUniversity of Michigan2.503.528–26.7+1.020.924%
Eliot HackUniversity of Chicago0.650.332–82.2−0.330.183%
James LeavittUniversity of Chicago1.361.042–82.2−0.330.183%
Max NaseefUniversity of Chicago0.830.512–82.2−0.330.183%
Timothy HesseUniversity of Notre Dame2.011.674–64.3−0.340.181%
Michael CyrulUniversity of Notre Dame1.711.374–64.3−0.340.181%
Payden PittmanUniversity of Notre Dame1.621.294–64.3−0.340.181%
Abe WestonUniversity of Wisconsin2.150.596–48.1−1.562.499%
Charlie HerrickUniversity of Wisconsin2.320.776–48.1−1.562.499%
Quinn KaiserUniversity of Wisconsin2.060.516–48.1−1.562.499%
Christopher DraperPurdue University1.07-1.930–100.4≤−3.000.7>99%
Gavin HolmesPurdue University0.37-2.630–100.4≤−3.000.7>99%
Olivia DegrellaPurdue University0.02-2.980–100.4≤−3.000.7>99%

Match by match

Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).

Rd#WinnerLoser P(winner)
11Northwestern UniversityUniversity of Notre Dame91%
12University of MichiganPurdue University99%
13University of WisconsinUniversity of Chicago98%
14University of MichiganUniversity of Notre Dame80%
15Northwestern UniversityUniversity of Wisconsin53%
16University of ChicagoPurdue University84%
17University of MichiganUniversity of Wisconsin32%upset
18University of Notre DamePurdue University96%
19Northwestern UniversityUniversity of Chicago98%
110University of WisconsinPurdue University100%
111Northwestern UniversityUniversity of Michigan70%
112University of Notre DameUniversity of Chicago83%
113Northwestern UniversityPurdue University100%
114University of WisconsinUniversity of Notre Dame90%
115University of MichiganUniversity of Chicago95%
216University of Notre DamePurdue University96%
217Northwestern UniversityUniversity of Wisconsin51%
218University of MichiganUniversity of Chicago95%
219Northwestern UniversityUniversity of Notre Dame90%
220University of MichiganPurdue University99%
221University of WisconsinUniversity of Chicago97%
222University of MichiganUniversity of Notre Dame80%
223Northwestern UniversityUniversity of Chicago97%
224University of WisconsinPurdue University99%
225Northwestern UniversityUniversity of Michigan69%
226University of ChicagoPurdue University84%
227University of WisconsinUniversity of Notre Dame90%
228Northwestern UniversityPurdue University99%
229University of MichiganUniversity of Wisconsin31%upset
230University of Notre DameUniversity of Chicago80%

Round 1

TeamRec.WildcatsWolverinesBadgersIrishMaroonsBoilermakers
Northwestern University Wildcats5–0✕WWWWW
University of Michigan Wolverines4–1L✕WWWW
University of Wisconsin Badgers3–2LL✕WWW
University of Notre Dame Fighting Irish2–3LLL✕WW
University of Chicago Maroons1–4LLLL✕W
Purdue University Boilermakers0–5LLLLL✕

Round 2

TeamRec.WildcatsWolverinesBadgersIrishMaroonsBoilermakers
Northwestern University Wildcats5–0✕WWWWW
University of Michigan Wolverines4–1L✕WWWW
University of Wisconsin Badgers3–2LL✕WWW
University of Notre Dame Fighting Irish2–3LLL✕WW
University of Chicago Maroons1–4LLLL✕W
Purdue University Boilermakers0–5LLLLL✕
# Winner Loser Pos.
1 Northwestern University Wildcats 1-2-5 def. University of Notre Dame Fighting Irish 3-4-6
2 University of Michigan Wolverines 1-2-3 def. Purdue University Boilermakers 4-5-6
3 University of Wisconsin Badgers 1-2-5 def. University of Chicago Maroons 3-4-6
4 University of Michigan Wolverines 2-3-4 def. University of Notre Dame Fighting Irish 1-5-6
5 Northwestern University Wildcats 2-3-4 def. University of Wisconsin Badgers 1-5-6
6 University of Chicago Maroons 1-2-3 def. Purdue University Boilermakers 4-5-6
7 University of Michigan Wolverines 1-3-6 def. University of Wisconsin Badgers 2-4-5
8 University of Notre Dame Fighting Irish 1-2-4 def. Purdue University Boilermakers 3-5-6
9 Northwestern University Wildcats 1-2-4 def. University of Chicago Maroons 3-5-6
10 University of Wisconsin Badgers 1-2-5 def. Purdue University Boilermakers 3-4-6
11 Northwestern University Wildcats 1-3-4 def. University of Michigan Wolverines 2-5-6
12 University of Notre Dame Fighting Irish 1-2-5 def. University of Chicago Maroons 3-4-6
13 Northwestern University Wildcats 1-2-3 def. Purdue University Boilermakers 4-5-6
14 University of Wisconsin Badgers 1-2-6 def. University of Notre Dame Fighting Irish 3-4-5
15 University of Michigan Wolverines 1-2-3 def. University of Chicago Maroons 4-5-6
16 University of Notre Dame Fighting Irish 1-2-5 def. Purdue University Boilermakers 3-4-6
17 Northwestern University Wildcats 2-3-5 def. University of Wisconsin Badgers 1-4-6
18 University of Michigan Wolverines 1-2-3 def. University of Chicago Maroons 4-5-6
19 Northwestern University Wildcats 1-3-5 def. University of Notre Dame Fighting Irish 2-4-6
20 University of Michigan Wolverines 1-2-3 def. Purdue University Boilermakers 4-5-6
21 University of Wisconsin Badgers 1-2-3 def. University of Chicago Maroons 4-5-6
22 University of Michigan Wolverines 1-2-3 def. University of Notre Dame Fighting Irish 4-5-6
23 Northwestern University Wildcats 1-2-4 def. University of Chicago Maroons 3-5-6
24 University of Wisconsin Badgers 1-2-3 def. Purdue University Boilermakers 4-5-6
25 Northwestern University Wildcats 1-4-5 def. University of Michigan Wolverines 2-3-6
26 University of Chicago Maroons 1-2-5 def. Purdue University Boilermakers 3-4-6
27 University of Wisconsin Badgers 1-2-6 def. University of Notre Dame Fighting Irish 3-4-5
28 Northwestern University Wildcats 1-2-3 def. Purdue University Boilermakers 4-5-6
29 University of Michigan Wolverines 1-2-3 def. University of Wisconsin Badgers 4-5-6
30 University of Notre Dame Fighting Irish 1-2-3 def. University of Chicago Maroons 4-5-6

Conditions — 04/10/2026 (8am–6pm)

🌤️Partly cloudy
Humidity 64%  ·  Pressure 1026.0 hPa

Temperature

48°F
↑ 52°F   ↓ 42°F
Feels like 42°F

Wind

● from   ▲ toward
7.3 kn
avg  ·  max 8.9 kn
Gusts to 19.6 kn
From NW (325°)

Sky & Precipitation

Cloud cover64% Sunshine8.5 hrs Humidity64% Pressure1026.0 hPa

What this breeze does at Wisconsin — from fleet racing

Breeze: NW about 10 kn (weather reanalysis in the scorer’s units)
In fleet races at Wisconsin in this breeze: a strongly favourites’ day (+0.15)
Favourites’ conditions: in fleet racing here the results follow the ratings more closely than usual, and the top seeds hold their places.

Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.15 means a rating gap counts about 13% more than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.

Orderliness beyond the fleet at Wisconsin by wind direction (angle) and speed (rings), fitted surface; dots are labelled regatta-days, ★ this regatta (41 labelled fleet-race days at Wisconsin).

From the notes

Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.

All notes →