| # | School | Team | A | TOT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Boston University | Terriers 2 | 10 | 10 | |
| 2 | Northeastern University | Huskies 2 | 17 | 17 | |
| 3 | Boston University | Terriers 1 | 26 | 26 | |
| 4 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Engineers 3 | 26 | 26 | |
| 5 | Northeastern University | Huskies 3 | 30 | 30 | |
| 6 | Northeastern University | Huskies 1 | 40 | 40 | |
| 7 | Northeastern University | Huskies 5 | 40 | 40 | |
| 8 | Northeastern University | Huskies 4 | 40 | 40 | |
| 9 | Tufts University | Jumbos 1 | 44 | 44 | |
| 10 | Boston University | Terriers 3 | 44 | 44 | |
| 11 | Tufts University | Jumbos 2 | 44 | 44 | |
| 12 | Johnson and Wales University | Wildcats 2 | 47 | 47 | |
| 13 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Engineers 4 | 58 | 58 | |
| 14 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Engineers 5 | 67 | 67 | |
| 15 | Wellesley College | Blue 2 | 77 | 77 | |
| 16 | Johnson and Wales University | Wildcats 3 | 79 | 79 | |
| 17 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Engineers 1 | 81 | 81 | |
| 18 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Engineers 2 | 88 | 88 | |
| 19 | Johnson and Wales University | Wildcats 1 | 92 | 92 | |
| 20 | Wellesley College | Blue 1 | 100 | 100 |
| Team | 1A | 2A | 3A | 4A | 5A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boston University Terriers 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| Boston University Terriers 2 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | |
| Boston University Terriers 3 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | |
| Johnson and Wales University Wildcats 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | |
| Johnson and Wales University Wildcats 2 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | |
| Johnson and Wales University Wildcats 3 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 2 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 3 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 4 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 5 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Northeastern University Huskies 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Northeastern University Huskies 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
| Northeastern University Huskies 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| Northeastern University Huskies 4 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | |
| Northeastern University Huskies 5 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | |
| Tufts University Jumbos 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Tufts University Jumbos 2 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | |
| Wellesley College Blue 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| Wellesley College Blue 2 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 19 |
Orderliness is how tightly the finishing order followed the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0). Positive is the favourites’ day: the ratings carried more weight than usual and the top seeds finished where expected. Negative is the underdogs’ day: the fleet compressed and the favourites came back to the pack. A value of ±0.05 means a rating gap counts about 5% less than on a typical day.
The breeze reading is the chart’s value at this regatta’s wind direction and speed (the star): this venue’s pattern of which directions bring order and which bring upsets, with breeze generally orderly and light air surprising. The fleet adjustment comes from the entry list: the stronger and more experienced the fleet, the more surprising the racing. How this is estimated · compare venues.
Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.