Washington College Team Race

# SchoolTeam Rec.
1 George Washington University George Washington University Colonials 12–3
2 Fordham University Fordham University Rams 1 10–5
3 U. S. Naval Academy U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen 10–5
4 University of Pennsylvania University of Pennsylvania Quakers 7–8
5 Fordham University Fordham University Rams 2 6–9
6 Washington College Washington College Shoremen 0–15

Pre-event forecast

Fitted on the 12,533 team race matches sailed before 2019-03-16, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 33 of 45 matches (73%) with a log-loss of 0.423 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went well for the forecast. Orderliness +0.10 ± 0.29: a typical event, more orderly than 53% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.

PlaceSchool Pred. Strength Boats (skipper / crew, boat value) Pred. win % Recordvs forecast
1George Washington University
Colonials
38.08
school +0.09
Andrew Bennett / Chiara Perotti Correa
Cameron Feves / Keily Gleason
Soenke Jordan / Jack Umina 2.83
60%12–3 (80%)+3.0
2Fordham University
Rams 1
28.40
school +0.20
Porter Kavle / Brigid Murphy 3.09
Clayton Snyder / Sarah Jackman 2.34 9–3
Eduardo Mintzias / Makena Masterson 3.15 6–3
Thomas Capozzi / Makena Masterson 2.15 4–2
Thomas Capozzi / Sarah Jackman 2.05 1–2
69%10–5 (67%)−0.4
3U. S. Naval Academy
Midshipmen
19.04
school +0.32
Tyler Fleig / Anna Cutler 2.57
Nicholas Gartner / Fiona Lobon 3.15
Gray Benson / Madeline Pruzan 2.92
80%10–5 (67%)−1.9
4University of Pennsylvania
Quakers
57.19Amanda Majernik / Lauren Nguyen 2.49
Lenox Butcher / Jenna Weiner 2.54
Tanner Probst / Adam Hano 2.05
40%7–8 (47%)+1.1
5Fordham University
Rams 2
47.37
school +0.20
Grace Howie / Elizabeth Hupp 2.66
Thomas Cooper / Paige Hoffman 2.19
Charlotte Leclue / Maggie Costikyan 4–8
Charlotte Leclue / Matthew Alfano 2–1
47%6–9 (40%)−1.1
6Washington College
Shoremen
64.50
school −0.27, home +0.37
Andrew Vernon / John Mecca 1.25
Paul Hart / Lindsay Fullerton 1.74
Henry Proud / Eloise Lienert 1.29
4%0–15 (0%)−0.6

Surprisal: who beat their rating

Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.

PlaceSchoolStrength Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
1George Washington University Colonials8.089.3212–39.0+1.242.56%
4University of Pennsylvania Quakers7.197.637–85.9+0.440.334%
2Fordham University Rams 18.408.2510–510.4−0.150.072%
5Fordham University Rams 27.376.946–97.1−0.440.384%
3U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen9.048.2410–511.9−0.801.295%
6Washington College Shoremen4.501.500–150.6≤−3.000.8>99%

By skipper

SkipperSchoolValue Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
Andrew BennettGeorge Washington University2.253.4912–39.0+1.242.56%
Amanda MajernikUniversity of Pennsylvania2.492.937–85.9+0.440.334%
Clayton SnyderFordham University2.342.529–38.7+0.180.055%
Eduardo MintziasFordham University3.153.326–35.7+0.170.056%
Thomas CooperFordham University2.191.766–97.1−0.440.384%
Andrew VernonWashington College1.25-1.750–150.6≤−3.000.8>99%
Paul HartWashington College1.74-1.260–150.6≤−3.000.8>99%
Henry ProudWashington College1.29-1.710–150.6≤−3.000.8>99%

Match by match

Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).

Rd#WinnerLoser P(winner)
11U. S. Naval Academy MidshipmenGeorge Washington University Colonials81%
12University of Pennsylvania QuakersFordham University Rams 247%upset
13Fordham University Rams 1Washington College Shoremen97%
14George Washington University ColonialsFordham University Rams 261%
15U. S. Naval Academy MidshipmenWashington College Shoremen99%
16Fordham University Rams 1University of Pennsylvania Quakers85%
17Fordham University Rams 2Washington College Shoremen95%
18George Washington University ColonialsUniversity of Pennsylvania Quakers67%
19Fordham University Rams 1U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen46%upset
110University of Pennsylvania QuakersWashington College Shoremen94%
111U. S. Naval Academy MidshipmenFordham University Rams 284%
112George Washington University ColonialsFordham University Rams 136%upset
113U. S. Naval Academy MidshipmenUniversity of Pennsylvania Quakers87%
114George Washington University ColonialsWashington College Shoremen97%
115Fordham University Rams 2Fordham University Rams 139%upset
216George Washington University ColonialsU. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen27%upset
217Fordham University Rams 2University of Pennsylvania Quakers54%
218Fordham University Rams 1Washington College Shoremen97%
219George Washington University ColonialsFordham University Rams 268%
220U. S. Naval Academy MidshipmenWashington College Shoremen99%
221Fordham University Rams 1University of Pennsylvania Quakers84%
222Fordham University Rams 2Washington College Shoremen95%
223George Washington University ColonialsUniversity of Pennsylvania Quakers72%
224U. S. Naval Academy MidshipmenFordham University Rams 154%
225University of Pennsylvania QuakersWashington College Shoremen94%
226U. S. Naval Academy MidshipmenFordham University Rams 284%
227George Washington University ColonialsFordham University Rams 142%upset
228U. S. Naval Academy MidshipmenUniversity of Pennsylvania Quakers86%
229George Washington University ColonialsWashington College Shoremen98%
230Fordham University Rams 2Fordham University Rams 139%upset
331George Washington University ColonialsU. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen31%upset
332University of Pennsylvania QuakersFordham University Rams 246%upset
333Fordham University Rams 1Washington College Shoremen97%
334George Washington University ColonialsFordham University Rams 270%
335U. S. Naval Academy MidshipmenWashington College Shoremen99%
336Fordham University Rams 1University of Pennsylvania Quakers84%
337Fordham University Rams 2Washington College Shoremen95%
338University of Pennsylvania QuakersGeorge Washington University Colonials26%upset
339Fordham University Rams 1U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen46%upset
340University of Pennsylvania QuakersWashington College Shoremen94%
341U. S. Naval Academy MidshipmenFordham University Rams 284%
342Fordham University Rams 1George Washington University Colonials55%
343University of Pennsylvania QuakersU. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen14%upset
344George Washington University ColonialsWashington College Shoremen98%
345Fordham University Rams 1Fordham University Rams 261%

Round 1

TeamRec.Colonials1MidshipmenQuakers2Shoremen
George Washington University Colonials4–1✕WLWWW
Fordham University Rams 15–5L✕LW✕W
U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen4–1WW✕WWW
University of Pennsylvania Quakers2–3LLL✕LW
Fordham University Rams 25–5L✕LW✕W
Washington College Shoremen0–5LLLLL✕

Round 2

TeamRec.Colonials1MidshipmenQuakers2Shoremen
George Washington University Colonials5–0✕WWWWW
Fordham University Rams 15–5L✕LW✕W
U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen4–1LW✕WWW
University of Pennsylvania Quakers1–4LLL✕LW
Fordham University Rams 25–5L✕LW✕W
Washington College Shoremen0–5LLLLL✕

Round 3

TeamRec.Colonials1MidshipmenQuakers2Shoremen
George Washington University Colonials3–2✕LWLLW
Fordham University Rams 16–4W✕LW✕W
U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen2–3LW✕LWW
University of Pennsylvania Quakers4–1WLW✕LW
Fordham University Rams 26–4W✕LW✕W
Washington College Shoremen0–5LLLLL✕
# Winner Loser Pos.
1 U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen 1-2-5 def. George Washington University Colonials 3-4-6
2 University of Pennsylvania Quakers 1-4-5 def. Fordham University Rams 2 2-3-6
3 Fordham University Rams 1 1-2-3 def. Washington College Shoremen 4-5-6
4 George Washington University Colonials 1-2-6 def. Fordham University Rams 2 3-4-5
5 U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen 1-2-3 def. Washington College Shoremen 4-5-6
6 Fordham University Rams 1 2-3-4 def. University of Pennsylvania Quakers 1-5-6
7 Fordham University Rams 2 1-2-3 def. Washington College Shoremen 4-5-6
8 George Washington University Colonials 1-2-5 def. University of Pennsylvania Quakers 3-4-6
9 Fordham University Rams 1 2-3-4 def. U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen 1-5-6
10 University of Pennsylvania Quakers 1-2-5 def. Washington College Shoremen 3-4-6
11 U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen 1-4-5 def. Fordham University Rams 2 2-3-6
12 George Washington University Colonials 1-3-6 def. Fordham University Rams 1 2-4-5
13 U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen 1-3-5 def. University of Pennsylvania Quakers 2-4-6
14 George Washington University Colonials 1-2-3 def. Washington College Shoremen 4-5-6
15 Fordham University Rams 2 1-3-4 def. Fordham University Rams 1 2-5-6
16 George Washington University Colonials 1-3-5 def. U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen 2-4-6 DSQ
17 Fordham University Rams 2 1-2-5 def. University of Pennsylvania Quakers 3-4-6
18 Fordham University Rams 1 1-2-3 def. Washington College Shoremen 4-5-6
19 George Washington University Colonials 1-2-5 def. Fordham University Rams 2 3-4-6
20 U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen 1-2-3 def. Washington College Shoremen 4-5-6
21 Fordham University Rams 1 1-2-4 def. University of Pennsylvania Quakers 3-5-6
22 Fordham University Rams 2 2-3-5 def. Washington College Shoremen 1-4-6
23 George Washington University Colonials 1-2-3 def. University of Pennsylvania Quakers 4-5-6
24 U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen 2-3-5 def. Fordham University Rams 1 1-4-6
25 University of Pennsylvania Quakers 1-2-3 def. Washington College Shoremen 4-5-6
26 U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen 1-4-5 def. Fordham University Rams 2 2-3-6
27 George Washington University Colonials 1-2-3 def. Fordham University Rams 1 4-5-6
28 U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen 1-2-5 def. University of Pennsylvania Quakers 3-4-6
29 George Washington University Colonials 1-2-3 def. Washington College Shoremen 4-5-6
30 Fordham University Rams 2 1-3-4 def. Fordham University Rams 1 2-5-6
31 George Washington University Colonials 1-2-5 def. U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen 3-4-6
32 University of Pennsylvania Quakers 1-4-5 def. Fordham University Rams 2 2-3-6
33 Fordham University Rams 1 1-3-4 def. Washington College Shoremen 2-5-6
34 George Washington University Colonials 1-2-6 def. Fordham University Rams 2 3-4-5
35 U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen 1-2-3 def. Washington College Shoremen 4-5-6
36 Fordham University Rams 1 1-3-5 def. University of Pennsylvania Quakers 2-4-6
37 Fordham University Rams 2 1-3-4 def. Washington College Shoremen 2-5-6
38 University of Pennsylvania Quakers 1-4-5 def. George Washington University Colonials 2-3-6
39 Fordham University Rams 1 1-3-4 def. U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen 2-5-6
40 University of Pennsylvania Quakers 1-2-4 def. Washington College Shoremen 3-5-6
41 U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen 1-2-3 def. Fordham University Rams 2 4-5-6
42 Fordham University Rams 1 1-2-6 def. George Washington University Colonials 3-4-5
43 University of Pennsylvania Quakers 1-2-5 def. U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen 3-4-6
44 George Washington University Colonials 1-2-4 def. Washington College Shoremen 3-5-6
45 Fordham University Rams 1 1-3-5 def. Fordham University Rams 2 2-4-6

Conditions — 03/16/2019 (8am–6pm)

☁️Overcast
Humidity 40%  ·  Pressure 1019.4 hPa

Temperature

47°F
↑ 49°F   ↓ 45°F
Feels like 36°F

Wind

● from   ▲ toward
13.3 kn
avg  ·  max 14.2 kn
Gusts to 29.9 kn
From WNW (297°)

Sky & Precipitation

Cloud cover79% Sunshine9.0 hrs Humidity40% Pressure1019.4 hPa

What this breeze does at Washington College — from fleet racing

Breeze: NW about 14 kn (weather reanalysis in the scorer’s units)
In fleet races at Washington College in this breeze: a favourites’ day (+0.04)
Favourites’ conditions: in fleet racing here the results follow the ratings more closely than usual, and the top seeds hold their places.

Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.04 means a rating gap counts about 3% more than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.

Orderliness beyond the fleet at Washington College by wind direction (angle) and speed (rings), fitted surface; dots are labelled regatta-days, ★ this regatta (17 labelled fleet-race days at Washington College).

From the notes

Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.

All notes →