University of Michigan '16
How much better or worse boats do with this sailor crewing than their skipper's rating predicts, shown on the skipper scale so crews can be lined up across teams. Percentiles compare against rostered crews that season (league) or teammates (team).
How crew ratings work →Crew effect over their whole career, not scaled to a team: 41.20 percentile among ICSA crews with 30+ races. Uncertainty ±0.106 rating points from 71 races with rated skippers.
How crew ratings work →No season rating yet: needs 8+ crewed races in a season.
A team race rating is what the sailor brings to one of the three boats: 0.72 x their fleet rating plus a team-race offset learned from every match they sailed, shrunk toward zero so a few matches cannot move it far. Sides are compared by the sum of their three boats plus the school's team race strength.
| Rating | Rank | vs fleet rating | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.46 | unranked (fewer than 30 matches as skipper, or not active) | +0.00 about what the fleet rating predicts |
as crew 16–25 (39%) |
| Season | Regattas | Skipper W–L | Crew W–L |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spring 2016 | 2 | — | 6–25 |
| Spring 2015 | 1 | — | 10–0 |
For each regatta, the boat value that would have made this sailor's record least surprising: the shift applied to their boat alone, in the matches they sailed, with team-mates and opponents fixed at the pre-event forecast. A boat's skipper and crew share the boat, so they get the same number when they sailed every match together. Surprise is in bits at the pre-event value minus at the performance value; P(this good or better) treats the matches as independent at the forecast probabilities. Regattas forecast from fewer than 1,000 training matches are left out.
Over 3 graded regattas (41 matches) the record is 16–25 against 17.3 wins the pre-event forecasts expected (−1.3). 0 regattas clearly above the rating (P ≤ 20%), 2 clearly below (P ≥ 80%); 1 bits of surprise in all.
| Date | Regatta | Role | Value | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins |
Δ | Surprise (bits) |
P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-05-28 | LaserPerformance Team Race Nationals | crew | 2.33 | 1.90 | 2–13 | 2.4 | −0.43 | 0.1 | 83% |
| 2016-02-27 | Mendelblatt Team Race | crew | 2.41 | 1.88 | 4–12 | 5.1 | −0.53 | 0.4 | 86% |
| 2015-04-11 | Big Ten Team Race | crew | 2.19 | 5.20 | 10–0 | 9.8 | ≥+3.00 | 0.3 | 79% |
| Regatta | Role | Div | Races | Avg | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spring 2016 Team page Season | |||||
| Mendelblatt Team Race | Crew | TR | 16 | 25% | — |
| MCSA Co-ed Championship | Crew | A | 6 | 5.5 | — |
| LaserPerformance Team Race Nationals | Crew | TR | 15 | 13% | — |
| Gill Coed Western Semifinal | Crew | A | 11 | 14.6 | — |
| Charleston Spring Coed | Crew | A | 14 | 7.1 | — |
| Fall 2015 Team page Season | |||||
| MCSA Sloop Championship Keelboat | Crew | A | 4 | 3.8 | — |
| Cary-Price Memorial | Crew | A | 5 | 1.0 | — |
| Spring 2015 Team page Season | |||||
| Big Ten Team Race | Crew | TR | 10 | 100% | — |
| Fall 2014 Team page Season | |||||
| David Lee Arnoff/ HWS Fall Regatta | Crew | B | 4 | 6.2 | — |
| Cary-Price Memorial | Crew | B | 6 | 1.0 | — |
| Captain Hurst Bowl | Crew | A | 4 | 10.5 | — |
| 68th Timme Angsten | Crew | B | 3 | 3.7 | — |
| Spring 2014 Team page Season | |||||
| Charleston Spring Co-Ed | Crew | B | 6 | 8.3 | — |
| Fall 2013 Team page Season | |||||
| Cary-Price Interconference Regatta | Crew | A | 10 | 4.5 | — |
| Spring 2013 Team page Season | |||||
| Port of LA Harbor Cup Keelboat | Crew | A | 10 | 8.0 | — |
| Fall 2012 Team page Season | |||||
| Timme's Tune-Up | Crew | B | 2 | 9.5 | — |
Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.
