Harvard University '15
How much better or worse boats do with this sailor crewing than their skipper's rating predicts, shown on the skipper scale so crews can be lined up across teams. Percentiles compare against rostered crews that season (league) or teammates (team).
How crew ratings work →Crew effect over their whole career, not scaled to a team: 79.39 percentile among ICSA crews with 30+ races. Uncertainty ±0.102 rating points from 62 races with rated skippers.
How crew ratings work →No season rating yet: needs 8+ crewed races in a season.
A team race rating is what the sailor brings to one of the three boats: 0.72 x their fleet rating plus a team-race offset learned from every match they sailed, shrunk toward zero so a few matches cannot move it far. Sides are compared by the sum of their three boats plus the school's team race strength.
| Rating | Rank | vs fleet rating | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.94 (fleet 2.68) | unranked (fewer than 30 matches as skipper, or not active) | −0.00 ± 0.18 about what the fleet rating predicts |
as skipper 10–30 (25%) as crew 26–6 (81%) |
| Season | Regattas | Skipper W–L | Crew W–L |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spring 2014 | 1 | 10–8 | — |
| Fall 2013 | 2 | 0–22 | — |
| Spring 2013 | 1 | — | 17–1 |
| Fall 2012 | 1 | — | 9–5 |
For each regatta, the boat value that would have made this sailor's record least surprising: the shift applied to their boat alone, in the matches they sailed, with team-mates and opponents fixed at the pre-event forecast. A boat's skipper and crew share the boat, so they get the same number when they sailed every match together. Surprise is in bits at the pre-event value minus at the performance value; P(this good or better) treats the matches as independent at the forecast probabilities. Regattas forecast from fewer than 1,000 training matches are left out.
Over 3 graded regattas (40 matches) the record is 10–30 against 11.5 wins the pre-event forecasts expected (−1.5). 0 regattas clearly above the rating (P ≤ 20%), 2 clearly below (P ≥ 80%); 4 bits of surprise in all.
| Date | Regatta | Role | Value | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins |
Δ | Surprise (bits) |
P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-04-05 | Mystic Lake Team Race Invitational | skipper | 2.39 | 2.64 | 10–8 | 9.2 | +0.24 | 0.1 | 43% |
| 2013-10-20 | Lane Trophy | skipper | 2.36 | -0.64 | 0–12 | 1.5 | ≤−3.00 | 2.3 | >99% |
| 2013-10-19 | Norman Reid Trophy | skipper | 2.17 | -0.83 | 0–10 | 0.8 | ≤−3.00 | 1.2 | >99% |
| Regatta | Role | Div | Races | Avg | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fall 2014 Team page Season | |||||
| Olympians Regatta Keelboat | Crew | A | 15 | 4.1 | — |
| Firefly/ FJ Invitational Regatta | Skipper | B | 9 | 2.7 | 2.51 |
| Spring 2014 Team page Season | |||||
| Mystic Lake Team Race Invitational | Skipper | TR | 18 | 56% | — |
| Fall 2013 Team page Season | |||||
| 75th Annual Oberg Trophy | Skipper | C | 18 | 10.6 | 2.10 |
| Norman Reid Trophy | Skipper | TR | 10 | 0% | — |
| 64th Nevins Trophy | Crew | A | 6 | 13.3 | — |
| Lark Invitational, Central Series 1 | Skipper | A | 15 | 7.3 | 0.26 |
| Lane Trophy | Skipper | TR | 12 | 0% | — |
| Spring 2013 Team page Season | |||||
| Ted Ferrarone Team Race | Crew | TR | 18 | 94% | — |
| Oberg @ BU by NU | Skipper | B | 12 | 4.7 | 3.17 |
| Fall 2012 Team page Season | |||||
| Oberg | Skipper | B | 15 | 9.7 | 2.19 |
| Nevin's Trophy | Crew | A, B | 7 | 10.6 | — |
| Harry Anderson Trophy | Crew | B | 6 | 5.5 | — |
| Hap Moore Team Race | Crew | TR | 14 | 64% | — |
| Spring 2012 Team page Season | |||||
| ICSA Western Semi-Final | Crew | B | 2 | 8.5 | — |
| Admiral's Cup | Crew | A, B | 8 | 8.4 | — |
| Fall 2011 Team page Season | |||||
| Sherman Hoyt Trophy | Crew | B | 6 | 8.2 | — |
| 70th Prof Erwin Schell Trophy | Crew | A | 5 | 4.2 | — |
| Moody Trophy | Skipper | B | 8 | 14.8 | 1.35 |
| The Hatch Brown Trophy | Skipper | B | 2 | 11.5 | 2.41 |
| Harry Anderson | Crew | A, B | 4 | 9.5 | — |
| Danmark Trophy | Crew | B | 13 | 10.2 | — |
| Atlantic Coast Championship | Crew | B | 5 | 13.8 | — |
Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.
