| # | School | Team | Rec. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harvard University | Crimson | 17–1 | |
| 2 | University of Vermont | Catamounts | 12–5 | |
| 3 | Stanford University | Cardinal | 9–8 | |
| 4 | Boston University | Terriers | 8–10 | |
| 4 | Roger Williams University | Hawks | 8–10 | |
| 6 | University of Rhode Island | Rams | 7–10 | |
| 7 | Bowdoin College | Polar Bears | 6–11 | |
| 8 | SUNY Maritime College | Privateers | 3–15 |
Each side is the sum of its three boats (the skipper's fleet rating times 0.72 plus a team race offset learned from their past matches, plus the crew's offset and a small experience term) plus the school's team race strength and a home-water edge for the host. The win probability is a logistic function of the difference. The forecast was made before the event: the model was refitted on every match sailed before the first day, with fleet ratings as of the week before.
Fitted on the 988 team race matches sailed before 2013-03-30, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 46 of 70 matches (66%) with a log-loss of 0.637 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went poorly for the forecast. vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.
For each side, the performance strength is the value that would have made its record least surprising: the strength at which the model's expected wins over exactly these opponents equal the actual wins, with every opponent fixed at its pre-event strength. For a skipper, the same shift is applied only to their boat in the matches they sailed, with team-mates and opponents fixed; team-mates who sailed every match together therefore get the same number. Surprise is in bits: -log2 of the probability of the record at the pre-event strength minus the same at the performance strength. P(this good or better) treats matches as independent coin flips at the model's pre-event probabilities, so it ignores form within the day; read it as a rough guide.
Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.
| Place | School | Strength | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins | Δ | Surprise (bits) | P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harvard University | 10.00 | 12.15 | 17–1 | 12.6 | +2.16 | 5.5 | 1% |
| 3 | Stanford University | 8.31 | 9.32 | 9–8 | 5.4 | +1.01 | 2.7 | 4% |
| 2 | University of Vermont | 9.55 | 10.07 | 12–5 | 10.3 | +0.52 | 0.6 | 26% |
| 6 | University of Rhode Island | 8.44 | 8.83 | 7–10 | 5.6 | +0.39 | 0.4 | 31% |
| 7 | Bowdoin College | 8.68 | 8.56 | 6–11 | 6.4 | −0.12 | 0.0 | 69% |
| 8 | SUNY Maritime College | 8.20 | 7.42 | 3–15 | 5.2 | −0.78 | 1.2 | 94% |
| 4 | Boston University | 9.63 | 8.83 | 8–10 | 11.0 | −0.80 | 1.8 | 97% |
| 4 | Roger Williams University | 10.29 | 8.83 | 8–10 | 13.5 | −1.45 | 6.0 | >99% |
Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).
| Team | Rec. | Crimson | Catamounts | Cardinal | Terriers | Hawks | Rams | Bears | Privateers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvard University Crimson | 6–1 | ✕ | W | L | W | W | W | W | W | |
| University of Vermont Catamounts | 4–3 | L | ✕ | W | W | L | W | L | W | |
| Stanford University Cardinal | 3–4 | W | L | ✕ | L | W | L | W | L | |
| Boston University Terriers | 4–3 | L | L | W | ✕ | W | W | L | W | |
| Roger Williams University Hawks | 2–5 | L | W | L | L | ✕ | W | L | L | |
| University of Rhode Island Rams | 2–5 | L | L | W | L | L | ✕ | L | W | |
| Bowdoin College Polar Bears | 4–3 | L | W | L | W | W | W | ✕ | L | |
| SUNY Maritime College Privateers | 3–4 | L | L | W | L | W | L | W | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Crimson | Catamounts | Cardinal | Terriers | Hawks | Rams | Bears | Privateers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvard University Crimson | 7–0 | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| University of Vermont Catamounts | 5–2 | L | ✕ | W | W | W | L | W | W | |
| Stanford University Cardinal | 4–3 | L | L | ✕ | L | W | W | W | W | |
| Boston University Terriers | 3–4 | L | L | W | ✕ | L | W | L | W | |
| Roger Williams University Hawks | 4–3 | L | L | L | W | ✕ | W | W | W | |
| University of Rhode Island Rams | 3–4 | L | W | L | L | L | ✕ | W | W | |
| Bowdoin College Polar Bears | 2–5 | L | L | L | W | L | L | ✕ | W | |
| SUNY Maritime College Privateers | 0–7 | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Crimson | Catamounts | Cardinal | Terriers | Hawks | Rams | Bears | Privateers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvard University Crimson | 4–0 | ✕ | – | – | W | W | – | W | W | |
| University of Vermont Catamounts | 3–0 | – | ✕ | W | – | W | W | – | – | |
| Stanford University Cardinal | 2–1 | – | L | ✕ | – | – | – | W | W | |
| Boston University Terriers | 1–3 | L | – | – | ✕ | L | L | – | W | |
| Roger Williams University Hawks | 2–2 | L | L | – | W | ✕ | – | W | – | |
| University of Rhode Island Rams | 2–1 | – | L | – | W | – | ✕ | – | W | |
| Bowdoin College Polar Bears | 0–3 | L | – | L | – | L | – | ✕ | – | |
| SUNY Maritime College Privateers | 0–4 | L | – | L | L | – | L | – | ✕ |
| # | Winner | Loser | Pos. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Terriers | 1-3-4 | def. | Hawks | 2-5-6 | ||
| 2 | Crimson | 1-4-5 | def. | Polar Bears | 2-3-6 | ||
| 3 | Privateers | 1-2-4 | def. | Cardinal | 3-5-6 | ||
| 4 | Catamounts | 1-2-3 | def. | Rams | 4-5-6 | ||
| 5 | Polar Bears | 1-2-6 | def. | Hawks | 3-4-5 | ||
| 6 | Crimson | 1-2-4 | def. | Terriers | 3-5-6 | ||
| 7 | Rams | 1-2-4 | def. | Privateers | 3-5-6 | ||
| 8 | Catamounts | 2-3-4 | def. | Cardinal | 1-5-6 | ||
| 9 | Crimson | 2-3-4 | def. | Hawks | 1-5-6 | ||
| 10 | Terriers | 1-2-4 | def. | Privateers | 3-5-6 | ||
| 11 | Cardinal | 1-2-3 | def. | Polar Bears | 4-5-6 | ||
| 12 | Hawks | 1-2-4 | def. | Catamounts | 3-5-6 | ||
| 13 | Terriers | 2-3-4 | def. | Rams | 1-5-6 | ||
| 14 | Crimson | 1-2-4 | def. | Privateers | 3-5-6 | ||
| 15 | Polar Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-6 | ||
| 16 | Cardinal | 2-3-4 | def. | Hawks | 1-5-6 | ||
| 17 | Crimson | 1-2-6 | def. | Rams | 3-4-5 | ||
| 18 | Catamounts | 1-2-3 | def. | Terriers | 4-5-6 | ||
| 19 | Privateers | 1-2-3 | def. | Polar Bears | 4-5-6 | ||
| 20 | Hawks | 1-2-5 | def. | Rams | 3-4-6 | ||
| 21 | Crimson | 2-3-5 | def. | Catamounts | 1-4-6 | ||
| 22 | Terriers | 2-3-5 DSQ | def. | Cardinal | 1-4-6 DSQ | ||
| 23 | Polar Bears | 1-2-4 | def. | Rams | 3-5-6 | ||
| 24 | Privateers | 1-2-6 | def. | Hawks | 3-4-5 | ||
| 25 | Cardinal | 1-2-4 | def. | Crimson | 3-5-6 | ||
| 26 | Polar Bears | 1-4-5 | def. | Terriers | 2-3-6 DSQ,DSQ | ||
| 27 | Catamounts | 1-2-6 | def. | Privateers | 3-4-5 | ||
| 28 | Rams | 1-2-3 | def. | Cardinal | 4-5-6 | ||
| 29 | Hawks | 1-2-6 | def. | Terriers | 3-4-5 | ||
| 30 | Crimson | 2-3-4 | def. | Polar Bears | 1-5-6 | ||
| 31 | Cardinal | 1-2-5 | def. | Privateers | 3-4-6 | ||
| 32 | Rams | 1-2-6 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-5 | ||
| 33 | Hawks | 1-4-5 | def. | Polar Bears | 2-3-6 | ||
| 34 | Crimson | 2-3-4 | def. | Terriers | 1-5-6 | ||
| 35 | Rams | 2-3-4 | def. | Privateers | 1-5-6 | ||
| 36 | Catamounts | 2-3-4 | def. | Cardinal | 1-5-6 | ||
| 37 | Crimson | 1-2-6 | def. | Hawks | 3-4-5 | ||
| 38 | Terriers | 1-3-5 | def. | Privateers | 2-4-6 | ||
| 39 | Cardinal | 1-2-5 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 40 | Catamounts | 1-3-4 | def. | Hawks | 2-5-6 | ||
| 41 | Terriers | 1-2-3 | def. | Rams | 4-5-6 | ||
| 42 | Crimson | 1-2-3 | def. | Privateers | 4-5-6 | ||
| 43 | Catamounts | 1-2-5 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 44 | Cardinal | 1-2-4 | def. | Hawks | 3-5-6 | ||
| 45 | Crimson | 1-2-4 | def. | Rams | 3-5-6 | ||
| 46 | Catamounts | 1-2-4 | def. | Terriers | 3-5-6 | ||
| 47 | Polar Bears | 3-4-5 | def. | Privateers | 1-2-6 DSQ | ||
| 48 | Hawks | 1-2-6 | def. | Rams | 3-4-5 | ||
| 49 | Crimson | 1-2-6 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-5 | ||
| 50 | Terriers | 1-2-5 | def. | Cardinal | 3-4-6 | ||
| 51 | Rams | 1-2-6 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-4-5 | ||
| 52 | Hawks | 1-2-6 | def. | Privateers | 3-4-5 | ||
| 53 | Crimson | 1-2-3 | def. | Cardinal | 4-5-6 | ||
| 54 | Polar Bears | 2-3-6 | def. | Terriers | 1-4-5 DSQ | ||
| 55 | Catamounts | 1-2-3 | def. | Privateers | 4-5-6 | ||
| 56 | Cardinal | 1-2-6 | def. | Rams | 3-4-5 | ||
| 57 | Hawks | 1-2-5 | def. | Terriers | 3-4-6 | ||
| 58 | Crimson | 1-2-4 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-5-6 | ||
| 59 | Cardinal | 1-2-4 | def. | Privateers | 3-5-6 | ||
| 60 | Catamounts | 2-3-5 | def. | Rams | 1-4-6 | ||
| 61 | Hawks | 1-2-4 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-5-6 | ||
| 62 | Crimson | 1-2-5 | def. | Terriers | 3-4-6 | ||
| 63 | Rams | 1-2-5 | def. | Privateers | 3-4-6 | ||
| 64 | Catamounts | 1-2-3 | def. | Cardinal | 4-5-6 | ||
| 65 | Crimson | 1-2-5 | def. | Hawks | 3-4-6 | ||
| 66 | Terriers | 1-2-3 | def. | Privateers | 4-5-6 | ||
| 67 | Cardinal | 1-2-4 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-5-6 | ||
| 68 | Catamounts | 1-2-6 | def. | Hawks | 3-4-5 | ||
| 69 | Rams | 1-2-5 | def. | Terriers | 3-4-6 | ||
| 70 | Crimson | 1-3-6 | def. | Privateers | 2-4-5 | ||
Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.10 means a rating gap counts about 8% less than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.
Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.