Regis Trophy — Analysis

← Results

Performance rating answers one question for each skipper: holding every other skipper's rating fixed, which rating makes my actual race-by-race finishes least surprising? It is the maximum-likelihood rating under the same Plackett–Luce model that produces the power rankings (how accurate it is), with each opponent fixed at their rating from the last rated week before this event (2026-W38). Substitute skippers are scored only on the races they sailed, and races the boat did not finish (OCS, DNF and similar) are left out.

Percentile places a rating among the 1,996 ICSA skippers who were rated within the year before this event, so it reads as “better than X% of the skippers racing in this league right now”. The arrow shows where the sailor stood going in and where this performance would put them.

Surprise is how many bits more surprising the sailor's finishes were at their pre-event rating than at their performance rating (0 = exactly as expected). P(this good or better) simulates the regatta 3,000 times with the sailor at their pre-event rating against the actual fleet, and reports how often they would score this many points or fewer in the races they skippered. Races in one regatta are not independent, so each simulation also gives every skipper a good or bad regatta, form that drifts from race to race, and the speed of each boat the rotation puts them in (why). Low means an unusually good regatta, high means an unusually poor one. It deliberately ignores how rivals actually sailed, so it agrees with the performance rating rather than with the division finish, which also depends on everyone else's day. Ratings are shown on the rankings scale (model rating × 100). Only skippers are rated; crews are not part of the model.

  • n no rating before this event — the model's estimate from this week is used as the baseline.

Division A  17 boats · 10 races

Fin Skipper School Races Rating
before
Perf.
rating
Δ Percentile
before → perf.
Surprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
Avg finish
actual / exp.
Rating
after
1 Emma Wang '27 Massachusetts Institute of Technology 10/10 331 399 +68 91st → 97th 2.0 7% 3.6 / 6.0 332
2 Maddie Janzen '29 Tufts University Jumbos 1 10/10 386 383 -3 96th → 95th 0.0 42% 4.2 / 4.7 386
3 Carly Kieding '29 Yale University 10/10 388 324 -64 96th → 90th 2.4 70% 5.2 / 4.6 386
4 Madeline Murphy '29 U. S. Coast Guard Academy 10/10 306 325 +19 88th → 90th 0.2 24% 5.4 / 6.8 306
5 Maisy Sperry '29 Roger Williams University 10/10 283 336 +53 84th → 91st 1.3 18% 5.6 / 7.4 284
6 Julia Scipione '29 Connecticut College 10/10 273 314 +41 83rd → 89th 0.9 28% 6.5 / 7.6 274
7 Kiana Beachy '28 Tufts University Jumbos 2 10/10 268 238 -31 83rd → 78th 0.5 48% 7.6 / 7.8 268
7 Minx Anthony '30 University of Rhode Island 10/10 304 290 -14 87th → 86th 0.1 69% 7.6 / 6.8 303
9 Kate Joslin '28 Boston College 10/10 215 256 +41 74th → 80th 0.9 43% 8.9 / 9.3 216
10 Blake Oberbauer '29 Dartmouth College 10/10 224 166 -59 76th → 65th 1.9 73% 10.2 / 9.0 221
11 Mairéad Reitzel '28 Bowdoin College 10/10 230 221 -9 77th → 75th 0.1 78% 10.3 / 8.9 231
12 Isabella Cho '27 Northeastern University 6/10 217 214 -3 74th → 74th 0.0 70% 10.3 / 9.2 218
12 Jacqueline Ruggieri '27 Northeastern University 4/10 211 210 -1 73rd → 73rd 0.0 66% 10.5 / 9.4 196
13 Sage Andrews '28 Boston University 10/10 197 213 +16 71st → 74th 0.1 70% 10.8 / 9.8 211
14 Emilia Perriera '28 Salve Regina University 10/10 140 124 -16 61st → 57th 0.1 52% 11.5 / 11.3 139
15 Grace Naylor '29 Harvard University 10/10 93 101 +8 51st → 52nd 0.0 51% 12.6 / 12.4 94
16 Georgia Green '28 Bates College 10/10 -72 -112 -40 16th → 9th 0.4 84% 16.1 / 15.3 -72
17 Alling Lubitz '30 Williams College 10/10 -187n -135 +52 1st → 5th 0.5 56% 16.5 / 16.0 -187

Division B  17 boats · 10 races

Fin Skipper School Races Rating
before
Perf.
rating
Δ Percentile
before → perf.
Surprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
Avg finish
actual / exp.
Rating
after
1 Sophia Hubbard '28 Tufts University Jumbos 1 10/10 334 378 +44 91st → 95th 0.9 17% 3.2 / 4.7 334
2 Karya Basaraner '28 Massachusetts Institute of Technology 10/10 332 318 -14 91st → 89th 0.1 43% 4.2 / 4.7 332
3 Emaline Ouellette '28 University of Rhode Island 6/10 240 270 +30 78th → 83rd 0.3 32% 5.8 / 7.0 240
3 Ariana Schwartz '27 University of Rhode Island 4/10 247 313 +65 79th → 89th 0.9 24% 5.0 / 6.9 248
4 Lilly Saffer '27 Connecticut College 10/10 216 265 +49 74th → 82nd 1.2 13% 5.7 / 7.8 216
5 Gabrielle Ahitow '28 Northeastern University 10/10 178 262 +84 67th → 82nd 3.4 11% 6.4 / 8.9 180
6 Bella Henrich '30 Dartmouth College 10/10 253 256 +2 80th → 80th 0.0 48% 6.5 / 6.8 254
7 Clara Díaz Suárez '28 Yale University 10/10 171 233 +62 66th → 77th 1.9 22% 7.2 / 9.1 184
8 Sophie Niemann '30 Boston College 10/10 252 247 -5 80th → 79th 0.0 63% 7.3 / 6.8 253
9 Ella Demand '28 U. S. Coast Guard Academy 10/10 235 180 -55 78th → 68th 1.7 56% 7.4 / 7.2 234
10 Maria Skouloudi '27 Tufts University Jumbos 2 10/10 216 202 -14 74th → 72nd 0.1 59% 8.2 / 7.8 208
11 Juliana Lanz '30 Roger Williams University 10/10 195 157 -38 71st → 64th 0.9 74% 9.7 / 8.5 194
12 Posie Cabaniss '27 Bowdoin College 10/10 166 157 -9 65th → 64th 0.0 69% 10.1 / 9.2 160
13 Bailey Kreszswick '29 Boston University 8/10 132 153 +21 59th → 63rd 0.2 57% 10.5 / 10.1 133
13 Lydia Carscaddon '30 Boston University 2/10 114 -97 -211 55th → 11th 4.8 98% 15.5 / 10.6 113
14 Noelle Brighton '30 Harvard University 10/10 64n 42 -22 44th → 41st 0.2 71% 13.5 / 11.6 64
15 Olivia Blackmer '28 Salve Regina University 10/10 35 43 +8 39th → 41st 0.0 73% 13.8 / 12.5 35
16 Ruby Turner '30 Bates College 10/10 -79 -125 -46 15th → 7th 0.7 88% 16.0 / 14.6 -84
17 Skyla Horne Perez '30 Williams College 10/10 -192n -253 -61 1st → 1st 0.6 85% 16.8 / 15.7 -192

From the notes

Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.

All notes →