GW Team Race

# SchoolTeam Rec.
1 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen 13–2
2 Georgetown University Georgetown University Hoyas 11–4
3 Fordham University Fordham University Rams 10–5
4 George Washington University George Washington University Colonials 6–9
5 Old Dominion University Old Dominion University Monarchs 4–11
6 St. Mary's College of Maryland St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks 1–14

Pre-event forecast

Fitted on the 7,487 team race matches sailed before 2017-03-04, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 30 of 45 matches (67%) with a log-loss of 0.668 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went poorly for the forecast. Orderliness −0.62 ± 0.28: an upset-heavy event, more orderly than 7% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.

PlaceSchool Pred. Strength Boats (skipper / crew, boat value) Pred. win % Recordvs forecast
1Hobart and William Smith Colleges
Statesmen
111.16
school +0.19
Greiner Hobbs / Sarah Warren 3.85
Charles Miller / Lindsey Kloc 3.27
Hector Guzman / Maya Weber
81%13–2 (87%)+0.8
2Georgetown University
Hoyas
210.87Sean Segerblom / Claire Mohun
Andy Reiter / Hannah Hess 3.30
William Logue / Albert Kraus
76%11–4 (73%)−0.4
3Fordham University
Rams
49.22
school −0.25
Will Holz / Makena Masterson 3.16
Alecsander Tayler / Katherine Jones 3.40
Matt Cappetta / Cortney Rielly 2.61 9–3
Roberto Stevens / Cortney Rielly 2.75 1–2
39%10–5 (67%)+4.1
4George Washington University
Colonials
58.51
school −0.25, home +0.22
Sam White / Sarah Noyes 2.80
Wade Wagner / Gabriella Malek 2.72
Rhodes Garner / Zachary Lehan
24%6–9 (40%)+2.4
5Old Dominion University
Monarchs
68.32
school −0.30
Lee Dumaliang / Stephen Guglielmo 2.95
James Jacob / Dane Pedersen
Dreugh Phillips / Gavin Burkhart
20%4–11 (27%)+1.0
6St. Mary's College of Maryland
Seahawks
310.11
school +0.71
Liam Mccarthy / Dyson Lord 2.80
Carolyn Smith / Julia Monro 3.23
Patrick Tara / Kaisey Mccallion 3.05
59%1–14 (7%)−7.9

Surprisal: who beat their rating

Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.

PlaceSchoolStrength Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
3Fordham University9.2210.7410–55.9+1.514.51%
4George Washington University8.519.466–93.6+0.951.710%
1Hobart and William Smith Colleges11.1611.6213–212.2+0.460.343%
5Old Dominion University8.328.744–113.0+0.420.336%
2Georgetown University10.8710.7111–411.4−0.170.073%
6St. Mary's College of Maryland10.116.471–148.9−3.6417.7>99%

By skipper

SkipperSchoolValue Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
Will HolzFordham University3.164.6710–55.9+1.514.51%
Alecsander TaylerFordham University3.404.9210–55.9+1.514.51%
Sam WhiteGeorge Washington University2.803.756–93.6+0.951.710%
Charles MillerHobart and William Smith Colleges3.273.7313–212.2+0.460.343%
Lee DumaliangOld Dominion University2.953.374–113.0+0.420.336%
Andy ReiterGeorgetown University3.303.1311–411.4−0.170.073%
William LogueGeorgetown University3.383.2111–411.4−0.170.073%
Roberto StevensFordham University2.751.311–22.0−1.441.197%
Carolyn SmithSt. Mary's College of Maryland3.23-0.411–148.9−3.6417.7>99%
Patrick TaraSt. Mary's College of Maryland3.05-0.591–148.9−3.6417.7>99%

Match by match

Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).

Rd#WinnerLoser P(winner)
11Hobart and William Smith CollegesGeorge Washington University94%
12Georgetown UniversityOld Dominion University92%
13Fordham UniversitySt. Mary's College of Maryland30%upset
14Georgetown UniversityGeorge Washington University91%
15Hobart and William Smith CollegesSt. Mary's College of Maryland76%
16Fordham UniversityOld Dominion University70%
17Georgetown UniversitySt. Mary's College of Maryland68%
18George Washington UniversityOld Dominion University54%
19Hobart and William Smith CollegesFordham University88%
110Old Dominion UniversitySt. Mary's College of Maryland15%upset
111Hobart and William Smith CollegesGeorgetown University58%
112Fordham UniversityGeorge Washington University68%
113Hobart and William Smith CollegesOld Dominion University94%
114George Washington UniversitySt. Mary's College of Maryland17%upset
115Georgetown UniversityFordham University84%
216Georgetown UniversityGeorge Washington University91%
217Fordham UniversityHobart and William Smith Colleges13%upset
218St. Mary's College of MarylandOld Dominion University86%
219Fordham UniversityGeorgetown University16%upset
220Old Dominion UniversityGeorge Washington University45%upset
221Hobart and William Smith CollegesSt. Mary's College of Maryland74%
222Fordham UniversityOld Dominion University71%
223Hobart and William Smith CollegesGeorgetown University56%
224George Washington UniversitySt. Mary's College of Maryland17%upset
225Hobart and William Smith CollegesOld Dominion University94%
226George Washington UniversityFordham University32%upset
227Georgetown UniversitySt. Mary's College of Maryland68%
228Hobart and William Smith CollegesGeorge Washington University93%
229Georgetown UniversityOld Dominion University93%
230Fordham UniversitySt. Mary's College of Maryland29%upset
331Georgetown UniversityFordham University84%
332George Washington UniversitySt. Mary's College of Maryland16%upset
333Hobart and William Smith CollegesOld Dominion University94%
334Fordham UniversitySt. Mary's College of Maryland29%upset
335Hobart and William Smith CollegesGeorgetown University55%
336Old Dominion UniversityGeorge Washington University45%upset
337Hobart and William Smith CollegesSt. Mary's College of Maryland73%
338George Washington UniversityFordham University32%upset
339Georgetown UniversityOld Dominion University93%
340Hobart and William Smith CollegesGeorge Washington University93%
341Georgetown UniversitySt. Mary's College of Maryland69%
342Fordham UniversityOld Dominion University72%
343Georgetown UniversityGeorge Washington University92%
344Fordham UniversityHobart and William Smith Colleges13%upset
345Old Dominion UniversitySt. Mary's College of Maryland14%upset

Round 1

TeamRec.StatesmenHoyasRamsColonialsMonarchsSeahawks
Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen5–0✕WWWWW
Georgetown University Hoyas4–1L✕WWWW
Fordham University Rams3–2LL✕WWW
George Washington University Colonials2–3LLL✕WW
Old Dominion University Monarchs1–4LLLL✕W
St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks0–5LLLLL✕

Round 2

TeamRec.StatesmenHoyasRamsColonialsMonarchsSeahawks
Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen4–1✕WLWWW
Georgetown University Hoyas3–2L✕LWWW
Fordham University Rams4–1WW✕LWW
George Washington University Colonials2–3LLW✕LW
Old Dominion University Monarchs1–4LLLW✕L
St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks1–4LLLLW✕

Round 3

TeamRec.StatesmenHoyasRamsColonialsMonarchsSeahawks
Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen4–1✕WLWWW
Georgetown University Hoyas4–1L✕WWWW
Fordham University Rams3–2WL✕LWW
George Washington University Colonials2–3LLW✕LW
Old Dominion University Monarchs2–3LLLW✕W
St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks0–5LLLLL✕
# Winner Loser Pos.
1 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen 2-4-5 def. George Washington University Colonials 1-3-6 OCS
2 Georgetown University Hoyas 1-2-5 def. Old Dominion University Monarchs 3-4-6
3 Fordham University Rams 1-2-5 def. St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks 3-4-6
4 Georgetown University Hoyas 1-2-3 def. George Washington University Colonials 4-5-6
5 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen 1-2-6 def. St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks 3-4-5
6 Fordham University Rams 2-3-4 def. Old Dominion University Monarchs 1-5-6
7 Georgetown University Hoyas 1-2-5 def. St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks 3-4-6
8 George Washington University Colonials 1-2-4 def. Old Dominion University Monarchs 3-5-6
9 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen 1-2-4 def. Fordham University Rams 3-5-6
10 Old Dominion University Monarchs 1-2-6 def. St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks 3-4-5
11 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen 1-2-6 def. Georgetown University Hoyas 3-4-5
12 Fordham University Rams 1-2-6 def. George Washington University Colonials 3-4-5
13 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen 1-2-3 def. Old Dominion University Monarchs 4-5-6
14 George Washington University Colonials 2-3-5 def. St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks 1-4-6
15 Georgetown University Hoyas 1-2-3 def. Fordham University Rams 4-5-6
16 Georgetown University Hoyas 1-2-4 def. George Washington University Colonials 3-5-6
17 Fordham University Rams 2-3-4 def. Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen 1-5-6
18 St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks 1-2-5 def. Old Dominion University Monarchs 3-4-6
19 Fordham University Rams 1-2-4 def. Georgetown University Hoyas 3-5-6
20 Old Dominion University Monarchs 1-2-3 def. George Washington University Colonials 4-5-6
21 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen 1-2-5 def. St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks 3-4-6
22 Fordham University Rams 2-3-4 def. Old Dominion University Monarchs 1-5-6
23 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen 1-2-4 def. Georgetown University Hoyas 3-5-6
24 George Washington University Colonials 1-2-5 def. St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks 3-4-6
25 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen 1-3-5 def. Old Dominion University Monarchs 2-4-6
26 George Washington University Colonials 2-3-4 def. Fordham University Rams 1-5-6
27 Georgetown University Hoyas 1-3-5 def. St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks 2-4-6
28 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen 1-2-3 def. George Washington University Colonials 4-5-6
29 Georgetown University Hoyas 1-2-5 def. Old Dominion University Monarchs 3-4-6
30 Fordham University Rams 1-2-3 def. St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks 4-5-6
31 Georgetown University Hoyas 1-2-5 def. Fordham University Rams 3-4-6
32 George Washington University Colonials 2-3-4 def. St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks 1-5-6
33 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen 1-2-6 def. Old Dominion University Monarchs 3-4-5
34 Fordham University Rams 1-2-4 def. St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks 3-5-6
35 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen 1-2-3 def. Georgetown University Hoyas 4-5-6
36 Old Dominion University Monarchs 1-2-4 def. George Washington University Colonials 3-5-6
37 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen 1-2-3 def. St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks 4-5-6
38 George Washington University Colonials 1-3-6 def. Fordham University Rams 2-4-5
39 Georgetown University Hoyas 2-3-5 def. Old Dominion University Monarchs 1-4-6
40 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen 1-2-6 def. George Washington University Colonials 3-4-5
41 Georgetown University Hoyas 1-2-3 def. St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks 4-5-6
42 Fordham University Rams 1-2-5 def. Old Dominion University Monarchs 3-4-6
43 Georgetown University Hoyas 1-2-6 def. George Washington University Colonials 3-4-5
44 Fordham University Rams 1-3-5 def. Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen 2-4-6
45 Old Dominion University Monarchs 1-2-5 def. St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks 3-4-6

Conditions — 03/04/2017 (8am–6pm)

☀️Clear sky
Humidity 39%  ·  Pressure 1035.3 hPa

Temperature

35°F
↑ 40°F   ↓ 24°F
Feels like 25°F

Wind

● from   ▲ toward
9.4 kn
avg  ·  max 11.9 kn
Gusts to 26.4 kn
From WNW (301°)

Sky & Precipitation

Cloud cover15% Sunshine10.0 hrs Humidity39% Pressure1035.3 hPa

What this breeze does at George Washington — from fleet racing

Breeze: NW about 11 kn (weather reanalysis in the scorer’s units)
In fleet races at George Washington in this breeze: a typical day (−0.01)
Nothing in this breeze favours either side in fleet racing here: results follow the ratings about as usual.

Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.01 means a rating gap counts about 1% less than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.

Orderliness beyond the fleet at George Washington by wind direction (angle) and speed (rings), fitted surface; dots are labelled regatta-days, ★ this regatta (only 3 labelled days at George Washington, so the surface is mostly the all-venue pattern).

From the notes

Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.

All notes →