Franny Charles Women’s Team Race Regatta

# SchoolTeam Rec.
1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 8–1
2 Brown University Brown University Bears 4–5
3 Northeastern University Northeastern University Huskies 4–5
4 Tufts University Tufts University Jumbos 2–7

Pre-event forecast

Fitted on the 19,442 team race matches sailed before 2023-03-11, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 11 of 18 matches (61%) with a log-loss of 0.584 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went about as expected for the forecast. Orderliness −0.32 ± 0.43: a typical event, more orderly than 18% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.

PlaceSchool Pred. Strength Boats (skipper / crew, boat value) Pred. win % Recordvs forecast
1Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Engineers
18.54
home +0.39
Emily Scherer / Yitian Zhu 2.34
Brooke Schmelz / Samantha Karlson 3.02
Lucy Brock / Grace Mao 2.82
86%8–1 (89%)+0.3
2Brown University
Bears
27.50
school +0.21
Katherine Mcnamara / Talia Levine 2.62
Katharine Doble / Janelle Li
Charlotte Costikyan / Catherine Morrissette 2.44 2–4
Emily Mueller / Sierra Bornheim 2.34 2–1
62%4–5 (44%)−1.6
3Northeastern University
Huskies
45.94
school +0.21
Lucia Loosbrock / Emma Cole 2.32
Eva Ermlich / Lila Coffman 2.11
Lauren Krim / Abigail Thress 1.24
23%4–5 (44%)+2.0
4Tufts University
Jumbos
36.27
school +0.13
Maisie Macgillivray / Annabel De Alessi
Ella Hubbard / Lilly Ladd
Meredith Broadus / Lilah Parker
30%2–7 (22%)−0.7

Surprisal: who beat their rating

Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.

PlaceSchoolStrength Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
3Northeastern University5.947.144–52.0+1.201.811%
1Massachusetts Institute of Technology8.548.848–17.7+0.310.162%
4Tufts University6.275.792–72.7−0.480.283%
2Brown University7.506.554–55.6−0.951.195%

By skipper

SkipperSchoolValue Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
Lucy BrockMassachusetts Institute of Technology2.824.014–52.0+1.201.811%
Meredith BroadusTufts University1.671.182–72.7−0.480.283%
Emily MuellerBrown University2.341.532–12.5−0.800.391%
Charlotte CostikyanBrown University2.441.402–43.1−1.050.895%

Match by match

Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).

Rd#WinnerLoser P(winner)
11Brown UniversityMassachusetts Institute of Technology24%upset
12Northeastern UniversityTufts University45%upset
13Brown UniversityTufts University78%
14Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyNortheastern University93%
15Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyTufts University91%
16Brown UniversityNortheastern University81%
27Northeastern UniversityBrown University18%upset
28Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyTufts University91%
29Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyNortheastern University93%
210Tufts UniversityBrown University22%upset
211Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyBrown University73%
212Northeastern UniversityTufts University41%upset
313Northeastern UniversityTufts University41%upset
314Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyBrown University72%
315Tufts UniversityBrown University22%upset
316Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyNortheastern University93%
317Brown UniversityNortheastern University82%
318Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyTufts University90%

Round 1

TeamRec.EngineersBearsHuskiesJumbos
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers2–1✕LWW
Brown University Bears3–0W✕WW
Northeastern University Huskies1–2LL✕W
Tufts University Jumbos0–3LLL✕

Round 2

TeamRec.EngineersBearsHuskiesJumbos
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers3–0✕WWW
Brown University Bears0–3L✕LL
Northeastern University Huskies2–1LW✕W
Tufts University Jumbos1–2LWL✕

Round 3

TeamRec.EngineersBearsHuskiesJumbos
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers3–0✕WWW
Brown University Bears1–2L✕WL
Northeastern University Huskies1–2LL✕W
Tufts University Jumbos1–2LWL✕
# Winner Loser Pos.
1 Brown University Bears 1-2-5 def. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 3-4-6
2 Northeastern University Huskies 2-3-4 def. Tufts University Jumbos 1-5-6
3 Brown University Bears 1-3-4 def. Tufts University Jumbos 2-5-6
4 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 1-2-4 def. Northeastern University Huskies 3-5-6
5 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 1-2-5 def. Tufts University Jumbos 3-4-6
6 Brown University Bears 1-2-6 def. Northeastern University Huskies 3-4-5
7 Northeastern University Huskies 1-2-5 def. Brown University Bears 3-4-6
8 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 2-3-4 def. Tufts University Jumbos 1-5-6
9 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 1-2-5 def. Northeastern University Huskies 3-4-6
10 Tufts University Jumbos 1-2-6 def. Brown University Bears 3-4-5
11 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 1-2-4 def. Brown University Bears 3-5-6
12 Northeastern University Huskies 1-2-5 def. Tufts University Jumbos 3-4-6
13 Northeastern University Huskies 1-2-6 def. Tufts University Jumbos 3-4-5
14 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 1-2-6 def. Brown University Bears 3-4-5
15 Tufts University Jumbos 1-2-5 def. Brown University Bears 3-4-6
16 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 1-2-5 def. Northeastern University Huskies 3-4-6
17 Brown University Bears 1-2-5 def. Northeastern University Huskies 3-4-6
18 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 1-2-4 def. Tufts University Jumbos 3-5-6

Conditions — 03/11/2023 (8am–6pm)

🌦️Light drizzle
Humidity 77%  ·  Pressure 1009.1 hPa

Temperature

37°F
↑ 38°F   ↓ 36°F
Feels like 27°F

Wind

● from   ▲ toward
11.4 kn
avg  ·  max 13.3 kn
Gusts to 24.1 kn
From NNE (24°)

Sky & Precipitation

Cloud cover100% Sunshine0.3 hrs Humidity77% Pressure1009.1 hPa Rain0.04 in Snow0.03 in

What this breeze does at MIT — from fleet racing

Breeze: NE about 13 kn (weather reanalysis in the scorer’s units)
In fleet races at MIT in this breeze: an underdogs’ day (−0.07)
Underdogs’ conditions: in fleet racing here the fleet bunches up and lower-rated boats beat the seeds more often than usual.

Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.07 means a rating gap counts about 6% less than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.

Orderliness beyond the fleet at MIT by wind direction (angle) and speed (rings), fitted surface; dots are labelled regatta-days, ★ this regatta (112 labelled fleet-race days at MIT).

From the notes

Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.

All notes →