Women's Staake Trophy Team Race

# SchoolTeam Rec.
1 Tufts University Tufts University Jumbos 9–0
2 University of Vermont University of Vermont Catamounts 4–5
3 University of Rhode Island University of Rhode Island Rams 4–5
4 Roger Williams University Roger Williams University Hawks 1–8

Pre-event forecast

Fitted on the 20,646 team race matches sailed before 2023-04-01, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 14 of 18 matches (78%) with a log-loss of 0.409 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went well for the forecast. Orderliness +0.43 ± 0.47: a typical event, more orderly than 87% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.

PlaceSchool Pred. Strength Boats (skipper / crew, boat value) Pred. win % Recordvs forecast
1Tufts University
Jumbos
17.90
school +0.12, home +0.41
Chloe Holder / Maisie Macgillivray 2.85
Annika Fedde / Naomi Pedersen 2.42
Samantha Jensen / Lilly Ladd 2.08
90%9–0 (100%)+0.9
2University of Vermont
Catamounts
45.47
school −0.14
Grace Gear / Maddy Saffer 2.38
Elizabeth Amelotte / Campbell Mcclellan 1.45
Audrey Commerford / Lilia Hutchins 1.74
30%4–5 (44%)+1.3
3University of Rhode Island
Rams
25.93Okyanus Arıkan / Elizabeth Taylor 2.63
Kytalin Hendrickson / Kaylee Good 2.31
Lily Moore / Katie Coughlin 0.98
43%4–5 (44%)+0.1
4Roger Williams University
Hawks
35.72
school +0.30
Grace Woodcock / Maren Matthews
Caylin Schnoor / Alexandra Chigas 1.97
Katherine Mcgagh / Elyssa Franklin 1.48
37%1–8 (11%)−2.3

Surprisal: who beat their rating

Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.

PlaceSchoolStrength Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
1Tufts University7.9010.909–08.1≥+3.001.338%
2University of Vermont5.476.194–52.7+0.730.726%
3University of Rhode Island5.936.014–53.9+0.070.061%
4Roger Williams University5.724.001–83.3−1.722.699%

By skipper

SkipperSchoolValue Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
Annika FeddeTufts University2.425.429–08.1≥+3.001.338%
Grace GearUniversity of Vermont2.383.114–52.7+0.730.726%
Elizabeth AmelotteUniversity of Vermont1.452.174–52.7+0.730.726%
Audrey CommerfordUniversity of Vermont1.742.474–52.7+0.730.726%
Okyanus ArıkanUniversity of Rhode Island2.632.704–53.9+0.070.061%
Lily MooreUniversity of Rhode Island0.981.054–53.9+0.070.061%
Grace WoodcockRoger Williams University1.920.201–83.3−1.722.699%
Katherine McgaghRoger Williams University1.48-0.241–83.3−1.722.699%

Match by match

Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).

Rd#WinnerLoser P(winner)
11Tufts UniversityRoger Williams University90%
12University of VermontUniversity of Rhode Island38%upset
13University of VermontRoger Williams University44%upset
14Tufts UniversityUniversity of Rhode Island88%
15Tufts UniversityUniversity of Vermont92%
16University of Rhode IslandRoger Williams University55%
27Tufts UniversityUniversity of Vermont92%
28University of Rhode IslandRoger Williams University55%
29Tufts UniversityUniversity of Rhode Island88%
210Roger Williams UniversityUniversity of Vermont56%
211University of Rhode IslandUniversity of Vermont62%
212Tufts UniversityRoger Williams University90%
313University of VermontUniversity of Rhode Island38%upset
314Tufts UniversityRoger Williams University90%
315University of VermontRoger Williams University44%upset
316Tufts UniversityUniversity of Rhode Island88%
317University of Rhode IslandRoger Williams University55%
318Tufts UniversityUniversity of Vermont92%

Round 1

TeamRec.JumbosCatamountsRamsHawks
Tufts University Jumbos3–0✕WWW
University of Vermont Catamounts2–1L✕WW
University of Rhode Island Rams1–2LL✕W
Roger Williams University Hawks0–3LLL✕

Round 2

TeamRec.JumbosCatamountsRamsHawks
Tufts University Jumbos3–0✕WWW
University of Vermont Catamounts0–3L✕LL
University of Rhode Island Rams2–1LW✕W
Roger Williams University Hawks1–2LWL✕

Round 3

TeamRec.JumbosCatamountsRamsHawks
Tufts University Jumbos3–0✕WWW
University of Vermont Catamounts2–1L✕WW
University of Rhode Island Rams1–2LL✕W
Roger Williams University Hawks0–3LLL✕
# Winner Loser Pos.
1 Tufts University Jumbos 1-2-5 def. Roger Williams University Hawks 3-4-6
2 University of Vermont Catamounts 1-2-6 def. University of Rhode Island Rams 3-4-5
3 University of Vermont Catamounts 1-2-5 def. Roger Williams University Hawks 3-4-6
4 Tufts University Jumbos 1-2-5 def. University of Rhode Island Rams 3-4-6
5 Tufts University Jumbos 1-4-5 def. University of Vermont Catamounts 2-3-6
6 University of Rhode Island Rams 2-3-4 def. Roger Williams University Hawks 1-5-6
7 Tufts University Jumbos 1-2-3 def. University of Vermont Catamounts 4-5-6
8 University of Rhode Island Rams 1-2-6 def. Roger Williams University Hawks 3-4-5
9 Tufts University Jumbos 1-3-6 def. University of Rhode Island Rams 2-4-5
10 Roger Williams University Hawks 1-2-4 def. University of Vermont Catamounts 3-5-6
11 University of Rhode Island Rams 1-2-3 def. University of Vermont Catamounts 4-5-6
12 Tufts University Jumbos 1-2-3 def. Roger Williams University Hawks 4-5-6
13 University of Vermont Catamounts 1-4-5 def. University of Rhode Island Rams 2-3-6
14 Tufts University Jumbos 1-2-4 def. Roger Williams University Hawks 3-5-6
15 University of Vermont Catamounts 1-2-6 def. Roger Williams University Hawks 3-4-5
16 Tufts University Jumbos 1-2-3 def. University of Rhode Island Rams 4-5-6
17 University of Rhode Island Rams 1-2-6 def. Roger Williams University Hawks 3-4-5
18 Tufts University Jumbos 1-2-3 def. University of Vermont Catamounts 4-5-6

Conditions — 04/01/2023 (8am–6pm)

🌦️Light drizzle
Humidity 93%  ·  Pressure 996.9 hPa

Temperature

54°F
↑ 63°F   ↓ 40°F
Feels like 50°F

Wind

● from   ▲ toward
9.7 kn
avg  ·  max 14.3 kn
Gusts to 26.2 kn
From SSW (205°)

Sky & Precipitation

Cloud cover93% Sunshine2.6 hrs Humidity93% Pressure996.9 hPa Rain0.37 in

What this breeze does at Tufts — from fleet racing

Breeze: SW about 12 kn (weather reanalysis in the scorer’s units)
In fleet races at Tufts in this breeze: an underdogs’ day (−0.08)
Underdogs’ conditions: in fleet racing here the fleet bunches up and lower-rated boats beat the seeds more often than usual.

Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.08 means a rating gap counts about 7% less than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.

Orderliness beyond the fleet at Tufts by wind direction (angle) and speed (rings), fitted surface; dots are labelled regatta-days, ★ this regatta (60 labelled fleet-race days at Tufts).

From the notes

Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.

All notes →