Phebe Corckran King Women's Team Race

# SchoolTeam Rec.
1 Stanford University Stanford University Cardinal 4–0
2 College of Charleston College of Charleston Cougars 3–1
3 Jacksonville University Jacksonville University Fins 1–3
4 Tulane University Tulane University Green Wave 1–3
5 University of South Florida University of South Florida Bulls 1–3

Pre-event forecast

Fitted on the 22,017 team race matches sailed before 2024-03-02, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 8 of 10 matches (80%) with a log-loss of 0.348 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went well for the forecast. Orderliness +0.13 ± 0.56: a typical event, more orderly than 58% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.

PlaceSchool Pred. Strength Boats (skipper / crew, boat value) Pred. win % Recordvs forecast
1Stanford University
Cardinal
110.95
school +0.42
Michelle Lahrkamp / Alice Schmid 3.56
Vanessa Lahrkamp / Gwendolyn Donahue 3.87
Ellie Harned / Grace Austin 3.09
95%4–0 (100%)+0.2
2College of Charleston
Cougars
28.72
school +0.34
Grace Squires / Chloe Hudgins 2.90
Emma Tallman / Noelle Owen 2.79
Emily Alfortish / Lucy Klempen 2.69
62%3–1 (75%)+0.5
3Jacksonville University
Fins
56.60
school −0.06
Emily Allen / Reagan Carris 2.77
Kaitlyn Liebel / Fiona Froelich 1.94
Agija Elerte / Payton Ruth 1.94
18%1–3 (25%)+0.3
4Tulane University
Green Wave
38.19
school +0.12
Ava Anderson / Catherine Anderson
Mia Hanes / Ellie Spearman 2.71
Samantha Gardner / Gillian Perrell
51%1–3 (25%)−1.0
5University of South Florida
Bulls
46.92
school −0.06
Kay Brunsvold / Kalea Woodard 2.74
Heidi Hicks / Madisen Hamai 1.75
Emma Shakespeare / Hannah Marsicano 2.49
24%1–3 (25%)+0.0

Surprisal: who beat their rating

Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.

PlaceSchoolStrength Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
1Stanford University10.9513.954–03.8≥+3.000.382%
2College of Charleston8.729.853–12.5+1.120.452%
3Jacksonville University6.607.131–30.7+0.530.158%
5University of South Florida6.927.001–31.0+0.080.072%
4Tulane University8.196.531–32.0−1.651.298%

By skipper

SkipperSchoolValue Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
Ellie HarnedStanford University3.096.094–03.8≥+3.000.382%
Agija ElerteJacksonville University1.942.471–30.7+0.530.158%
Ava AndersonTulane University2.420.761–32.0−1.651.298%
Mia HanesTulane University2.711.061–32.0−1.651.298%

Match by match

Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).

Rd#WinnerLoser P(winner)
11College of CharlestonJacksonville University89%
12Stanford UniversityTulane University94%
13College of CharlestonUniversity of South Florida86%
14Stanford UniversityJacksonville University99%
15University of South FloridaTulane University22%upset
16Stanford UniversityCollege of Charleston90%
17Stanford UniversityUniversity of South Florida98%
18Tulane UniversityJacksonville University83%
19College of CharlestonTulane University63%
110Jacksonville UniversityUniversity of South Florida42%upset

Round 1

TeamRec.CardinalCougarsFinsWaveBulls
Stanford University Cardinal4–0✕WWWW
College of Charleston Cougars3–1L✕WWW
Jacksonville University Fins1–3LL✕LW
Tulane University Green Wave1–3LLW✕L
University of South Florida Bulls1–3LLLW✕
# Winner Loser Pos.
1 College of Charleston Cougars 1-2-3 def. Jacksonville University Fins 4-5-6
2 Stanford University Cardinal 1-2-3 def. Tulane University Green Wave 4-5-6
3 College of Charleston Cougars 1-2-5 def. University of South Florida Bulls 3-4-6
4 Stanford University Cardinal 1-2-4 def. Jacksonville University Fins 3-5-6
5 University of South Florida Bulls 1-3-5 def. Tulane University Green Wave 2-4-6
6 Stanford University Cardinal 1-2-3 def. College of Charleston Cougars 4-5-6
7 Stanford University Cardinal 1-2-3 def. University of South Florida Bulls 4-5-6
8 Tulane University Green Wave 1-2-6 def. Jacksonville University Fins 3-4-5
9 College of Charleston Cougars 2-3-4 def. Tulane University Green Wave 1-5-6
10 Jacksonville University Fins 1-2-4 def. University of South Florida Bulls 3-5-6

Conditions — 03/02/2024 (8am–6pm)

☁️Overcast
Humidity 85%  ·  Pressure 1021.0 hPa

Temperature

66°F
↑ 71°F   ↓ 58°F
Feels like 67°F

Wind

● from   ▲ toward
5.2 kn
avg  ·  max 7.2 kn
Gusts to 13.6 kn
From WSW (250°)

Sky & Precipitation

Cloud cover100% Sunshine5.4 hrs Humidity85% Pressure1021.0 hPa Rain0.02 in

What this breeze does at Charleston — from fleet racing

Breeze: W about 8 kn (weather reanalysis in the scorer’s units)
In fleet races at Charleston in this breeze: a typical day (−0.00)
Nothing in this breeze favours either side in fleet racing here: results follow the ratings about as usual.

Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.00 means a rating gap counts about 1% less than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.

Orderliness beyond the fleet at Charleston by wind direction (angle) and speed (rings), fitted surface; dots are labelled regatta-days, ★ this regatta (69 labelled fleet-race days at Charleston).

From the notes

Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.

All notes →