| # | School | Team | Rec. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | College of Charleston | Cougars | 12–0 | |
| 2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Engineers | 9–2 | |
| 3 | University of South Florida | Bulls | 6–5 | |
| 4 | Jacksonville University | Fins | 6–5 | |
| 5 | University of Hawaii | Rainbows | 5–6 | |
| 6 | Rollins College | Tars | 2–10 | |
| 7 | Florida State University | Seminoles | 0–12 |
Each side is the sum of its three boats (the skipper's fleet rating times 0.72 plus a team race offset learned from their past matches, plus the crew's offset and a small experience term) plus the school's team race strength and a home-water edge for the host. The win probability is a logistic function of the difference. The forecast was made before the event: the model was refitted on every match sailed before the first day, with fleet ratings as of the week before.
Fitted on the 25,101 team race matches sailed before 2025-02-22, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 38 of 42 matches (90%) with a log-loss of 0.247 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went well for the forecast. Orderliness +0.36 ± 0.31: an orderly event, more orderly than 81% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.
For each side, the performance strength is the value that would have made its record least surprising: the strength at which the model's expected wins over exactly these opponents equal the actual wins, with every opponent fixed at its pre-event strength. For a skipper, the same shift is applied only to their boat in the matches they sailed, with team-mates and opponents fixed; team-mates who sailed every match together therefore get the same number. Surprise is in bits: -log2 of the probability of the record at the pre-event strength minus the same at the performance strength. P(this good or better) treats matches as independent coin flips at the model's pre-event probabilities, so it ignores form within the day; read it as a rough guide.
Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.
| Place | School | Strength | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins | Δ | Surprise (bits) | P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | College of Charleston | 8.79 | 11.79 | 12–0 | 11.0 | ≥+3.00 | 1.5 | 32% |
| 3 | University of South Florida | 6.16 | 6.78 | 7–5 | 5.9 | +0.63 | 0.5 | 32% |
| 5 | University of Hawaii | 5.83 | 6.32 | 6–6 | 5.1 | +0.49 | 0.3 | 38% |
| 2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | 7.56 | 7.60 | 9–3 | 8.9 | +0.04 | 0.0 | 66% |
| 4 | Jacksonville University | 6.94 | 6.05 | 6–6 | 7.6 | −0.89 | 1.0 | 94% |
| 6 | Rollins College | 4.92 | 2.44 | 2–10 | 3.4 | −2.48 | 1.9 | >99% |
| 7 | Florida State University | 0.00 | -3.00 | 0–12 | 0.0 | ≤−3.00 | 0.0 | >99% |
| Skipper | School | Value | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins | Δ | Surprise (bits) | P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fredrikke Foss | College of Charleston | 2.72 | 5.72 | 12–0 | 11.0 | ≥+3.00 | 1.5 | 32% |
| Ghislaine Van Empel | University of South Florida | 1.78 | 2.69 | 3–3 | 2.0 | +0.91 | 0.7 | 31% |
| Brooke Barry | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | 2.30 | 2.34 | 9–3 | 8.9 | +0.04 | 0.0 | 66% |
| Ka Hamner | Rollins College | 1.42 | -1.06 | 2–10 | 3.4 | −2.48 | 1.9 | >99% |
| Julia Scott | Rollins College | 1.51 | -0.97 | 2–10 | 3.4 | −2.48 | 1.9 | >99% |
| Olivia Figley | Florida State University | -0.88 | -3.88 | 0–12 | 0.0 | ≤−3.00 | 0.0 | >99% |
Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).
| Team | Rec. | Cougars | Engineers | Bulls | Fins | Rainbows | Tars | Seminoles | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| College of Charleston Cougars | 6–0 | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers | 5–1 | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | |
| University of South Florida Bulls | 3–3 | L | L | ✕ | W | L | W | W | |
| Jacksonville University Fins | 3–3 | L | L | L | ✕ | W | W | W | |
| University of Hawaii Rainbows | 3–3 | L | L | W | L | ✕ | W | W | |
| Rollins College Tars | 1–5 | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ | W | |
| Florida State University Seminoles | 0–6 | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Cougars | Engineers | Bulls | Fins | Rainbows | Tars | Seminoles | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| College of Charleston Cougars | 6–0 | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers | 4–2 | L | ✕ | W | W | L | W | W | |
| University of South Florida Bulls | 4–2 | L | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | |
| Jacksonville University Fins | 3–3 | L | L | L | ✕ | W | W | W | |
| University of Hawaii Rainbows | 3–3 | L | W | L | L | ✕ | W | W | |
| Rollins College Tars | 1–5 | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ | W | |
| Florida State University Seminoles | 0–6 | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ |
| # | Winner | Loser | Pos. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Engineers | 1-2-6 | def. | Fins | 3-4-5 | ||
| 2 | Tars | 1-2-4 | def. | Seminoles | 3-5-6 DNS | ||
| 3 | Cougars | 1-2-5 | def. | Rainbows | 3-4-6 | ||
| 4 | Bulls | 1-3-5 | def. | Fins | 2-4-6 | ||
| 5 | Engineers | 1-2-3 | def. | Seminoles | 4-5-6 | ||
| 6 | Cougars | 1-2-5 | def. | Tars | 3-4-6 | ||
| 7 | Rainbows | 1-2-6 | def. | Bulls | 3-4-5 | ||
| 8 | Fins | 1-2-4 | def. | Seminoles | 3-5-6 | ||
| 9 | Cougars | 1-2-6 | def. | Engineers | 3-4-5 | ||
| 10 | Rainbows | 1-2-6 | def. | Tars | 3-4-5 | ||
| 11 | Bulls | 1-2-3 | def. | Seminoles | 4-5-6 | ||
| 12 | Cougars | 1-3-4 | def. | Fins | 2-5-6 | ||
| 13 | Engineers | 1-2-5 | def. | Rainbows | 3-4-6 | ||
| 14 | Bulls | 2-3-5 | def. | Tars | 1-4-6 | ||
| 15 | Cougars | 1-2-3 | def. | Seminoles | 4-5-6 | ||
| 16 | Fins | 1-2-5 | def. | Rainbows | 3-4-6 | ||
| 17 | Engineers | 1-3-5 | def. | Tars | 2-4-6 | ||
| 18 | Cougars | 1-2-3 | def. | Bulls | 4-5-6 | ||
| 19 | Rainbows | 1-3-4 | def. | Seminoles | 2-5-6 | ||
| 20 | Fins | 2-3-4 | def. | Tars | 1-5-6 | ||
| 21 | Engineers | 1-2-5 | def. | Bulls | 3-4-6 | ||
| 22 | Fins | 1-2-5 | def. | Rainbows | 3-4-6 | ||
| 23 | Engineers | 1-2-4 | def. | Seminoles | 3-5-6 | ||
| 24 | Cougars | 1-3-6 | def. | Tars | 2-4-5 | ||
| 25 | Bulls | 1-2-6 | def. | Rainbows | 3-4-5 | ||
| 26 | Fins | 1-2-3 | def. | Seminoles | 4-5-6 | ||
| 27 | Cougars | 1-2-6 | def. | Engineers | 3-4-5 | ||
| 28 | Bulls | 1-3-4 | def. | Tars | 2-5-6 | ||
| 29 | Rainbows | 1-2-3 | def. | Seminoles | 4-5-6 | ||
| 30 | Cougars | 1-2-4 | def. | Fins | 3-5-6 | ||
| 31 | Engineers | 1-2-5 | def. | Tars | 3-4-6 | ||
| 32 | Bulls | 1-2-3 | def. | Seminoles | 4-5-6 | ||
| 33 | Cougars | 1-2-5 | def. | Rainbows | 3-4-6 | ||
| 34 | Fins | 1-2-5 | def. | Tars | 3-4-6 | ||
| 35 | Engineers | 1-3-4 | def. | Bulls | 2-5-6 | ||
| 36 | Cougars | 1-2-3 | def. | Seminoles | 4-5-6 | ||
| 37 | Rainbows | 2-3-4 | def. | Tars | 1-5-6 | ||
| 38 | Engineers | 1-2-5 | def. | Fins | 3-4-6 | ||
| 39 | Cougars | 1-2-5 | def. | Bulls | 3-4-6 | ||
| 40 | Tars | 1-2-3 | def. | Seminoles | 4-5-6 | ||
| 41 | Rainbows | def. | Engineers | ||||
| 42 | Bulls | def. | Fins | ||||
Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.09 means a rating gap counts about 7% more than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.
Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.