| # | School | Team | Rec. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | University of South Florida | Bulls | 15–1 | |
| 2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Engineers | 15–1 | |
| 3 | George Washington University | Colonials | 12–4 | |
| 4 | Jacksonville University | Dolphins | 8–8 | |
| 5 | University of Michigan | Wolverines | 8–8 | |
| 6 | Eckerd College | Tritons | 8–8 | |
| 7 | Christopher Newport University | Captains | 4–12 | |
| 8 | Texas A&M University at Galveston | Aggies | 2–14 | |
| 9 | Tulane University | Green Wave | 0–16 |
Each side is the sum of its three boats (the skipper's fleet rating times 0.72 plus a team race offset learned from their past matches, plus the crew's offset and a small experience term) plus the school's team race strength and a home-water edge for the host. The win probability is a logistic function of the difference. The forecast was made before the event: the model was refitted on every match sailed before the first day, with fleet ratings as of the week before.
Fitted on the 4,181 team race matches sailed before 2015-02-28, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 66 of 73 matches (90%) with a log-loss of 0.204 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went well for the forecast. Orderliness +0.42 ± 0.21: an orderly event, more orderly than 86% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.
For each side, the performance strength is the value that would have made its record least surprising: the strength at which the model's expected wins over exactly these opponents equal the actual wins, with every opponent fixed at its pre-event strength. For a skipper, the same shift is applied only to their boat in the matches they sailed, with team-mates and opponents fixed; team-mates who sailed every match together therefore get the same number. Surprise is in bits: -log2 of the probability of the record at the pre-event strength minus the same at the performance strength. P(this good or better) treats matches as independent coin flips at the model's pre-event probabilities, so it ignores form within the day; read it as a rough guide.
Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.
| Place | School | Strength | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins | Δ | Surprise (bits) | P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | University of South Florida | 10.67 | 11.88 | 16–1 | 14.7 | +1.21 | 1.1 | 25% |
| 4 | Jacksonville University | 6.97 | 7.88 | 8–8 | 6.2 | +0.90 | 1.2 | 17% |
| 3 | George Washington University | 9.15 | 9.54 | 12–4 | 11.4 | +0.39 | 0.2 | 48% |
| 8 | Texas A&M University at Galveston | 4.90 | 5.08 | 2–14 | 1.8 | +0.18 | 0.0 | 57% |
| 5 | University of Michigan | 7.69 | 7.76 | 8–8 | 7.9 | +0.07 | 0.0 | 60% |
| 2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | 10.84 | 10.84 | 15–2 | 15.0 | +0.00 | 0.0 | 69% |
| 7 | Christopher Newport University | 6.38 | 5.94 | 4–12 | 4.8 | −0.44 | 0.2 | 83% |
| 6 | Eckerd College | 8.19 | 7.52 | 8–8 | 9.3 | −0.67 | 0.6 | 91% |
| 9 | Tulane University | 5.13 | 2.13 | 0–16 | 2.0 | ≤−3.00 | 3.5 | >99% |
Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).
| Team | Rec. | Bulls | Engineers | Colonials | Dolphins | Wolverines | Tritons | Captains | Aggies | Wave | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of South Florida Bulls | 8–0 | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers | 7–1 | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| George Washington University Colonials | 6–2 | L | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Jacksonville University Dolphins | 4–4 | L | L | L | ✕ | L | W | W | W | W | |
| University of Michigan Wolverines | 5–3 | L | L | L | W | ✕ | W | W | W | W | |
| Eckerd College Tritons | 3–5 | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ | W | W | W | |
| Christopher Newport University Captains | 2–6 | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ | W | W | |
| Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies | 1–7 | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ | W | |
| Tulane University Green Wave | 0–8 | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Bulls | Engineers | Colonials | Dolphins | Wolverines | Tritons | Captains | Aggies | Wave | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of South Florida Bulls | 7–1 | ✕ | L | W | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers | 8–0 | W | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| George Washington University Colonials | 6–2 | L | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Jacksonville University Dolphins | 4–4 | L | L | L | ✕ | W | L | W | W | W | |
| University of Michigan Wolverines | 3–5 | L | L | L | L | ✕ | L | W | W | W | |
| Eckerd College Tritons | 5–3 | L | L | L | W | W | ✕ | W | W | W | |
| Christopher Newport University Captains | 2–6 | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ | W | W | |
| Texas A&M University at Galveston Aggies | 1–7 | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ | W | |
| Tulane University Green Wave | 0–8 | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Bulls | Engineers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of South Florida Bulls | 1–0 | ✕ | W | |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers | 0–1 | L | ✕ |
| # | Winner | Loser | Pos. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tritons | 1-2-5 | def. | Captains | 3-4-6 | ||
| 2 | Colonials | 1-2-6 | def. | Dolphins | 3-4-5 | ||
| 3 | Engineers | 1-2-5 | def. | Wolverines | 3-4-6 | ||
| 4 | Aggies | 2-3-4 | def. | Green Wave | 1-5-6 | ||
| 5 | Colonials | 1-2-4 | def. | Captains | 3-5-6 | ||
| 6 | Dolphins | 1-4-5 | def. | Tritons | 2-3-6 | ||
| 7 | Wolverines | 1-2-3 | def. | Aggies | 4-5-6 | ||
| 8 | Bulls | 1-2-6 | def. | Engineers | 3-4-5 | ||
| 9 | Dolphins | 1-2-6 | def. | Captains | 3-4-5 | ||
| 10 | Colonials | 2-3-4 | def. | Tritons | 1-5-6 | ||
| 11 | Wolverines | 1-2-4 | def. | Green Wave | 3-5-6 | ||
| 12 | Bulls | 1-2-4 | def. | Aggies | 3-5-6 | ||
| 13 | Wolverines | 1-2-6 | def. | Captains | 3-4-5 | ||
| 14 | Engineers | 1-2-6 | def. | Tritons | 3-4-5 | ||
| 15 | Bulls | 1-2-6 | def. | Colonials | 3-4-5 | ||
| 16 | Dolphins | 1-2-5 | def. | Green Wave | 3-4-6 | ||
| 17 | Engineers | 1-2-4 | def. | Captains | 3-5-6 | ||
| 18 | Colonials | 1-2-3 | def. | Green Wave | 4-5-6 | ||
| 19 | Bulls | 1-2-5 | def. | Tritons | 3-4-6 | ||
| 20 | Dolphins | 1-2-5 | def. | Aggies | 3-4-6 | ||
| 21 | Captains | 1-2-4 | def. | Aggies | 3-5-6 | ||
| 22 | Tritons | 1-2-3 | def. | Green Wave | 4-5-6 | ||
| 23 | Bulls | 1-2-3 | def. | Wolverines | 4-5-6 | ||
| 24 | Engineers | 1-3-6 | def. | Dolphins | 2-4-5 | ||
| 25 | Captains | 1-2-3 | def. | Green Wave | 4-5-6 | ||
| 26 | Tritons | 1-2-3 | def. | Aggies | 4-5-6 | ||
| 27 | Engineers | 1-2-4 | def. | Colonials | 3-5-6 | ||
| 28 | Bulls | 1-2-4 | def. | Dolphins | 3-5-6 | ||
| 29 | Bulls | 1-2-3 | def. | Captains | 4-5-6 | ||
| 30 | Engineers | 1-2-3 | def. | Green Wave | 4-5-6 | ||
| 31 | Colonials | 1-2-3 | def. | Aggies | 4-5-6 | ||
| 32 | Wolverines | 1-2-4 | def. | Tritons | 3-5-6 | ||
| 33 | Colonials | 1-4-5 | def. | Wolverines | 2-3-6 | ||
| 34 | Engineers | 1-2-3 | def. | Aggies | 4-5-6 | ||
| 35 | Bulls | 1-2-3 | def. | Green Wave | 4-5-6 | ||
| 36 | Wolverines | 1-2-5 | def. | Dolphins | 3-4-6 | ||
| 38 | Engineers | 2-3-4 | def. | Bulls | 1-5-6 | ||
| 39 | Colonials | 1-2-5 | def. | Wolverines | 3-4-6 | ||
| 40 | Tritons | 2-3-4 | def. | Dolphins | 1-5-6 | ||
| 41 | Captains | 1-3-4 | def. | Aggies | 2-5-6 | ||
| 42 | Bulls | 1-2-6 | def. | Colonials | 3-4-5 | ||
| 43 | Engineers | 1-2-3 | def. | Wolverines | 4-5-6 | ||
| 44 | Dolphins | 1-2-5 | def. | Captains | 3-4-6 | ||
| 45 | Tritons | 1-2-3 | def. | Green Wave | 4-5-6 | ||
| 46 | Bulls | 1-2-6 | def. | Wolverines | 3-4-5 | ||
| 47 | Engineers | 1-2-5 | def. | Colonials | 3-4-6 | ||
| 48 | Dolphins | 1-2-3 | def. | Aggies | 4-5-6 | ||
| 49 | Captains | 1-2-4 | def. | Green Wave | 3-5-6 | ||
| 50 | Bulls | 1-2-3 | def. | Dolphins | 4-5-6 | ||
| 51 | Engineers | 1-2-6 | def. | Tritons | 3-4-5 | ||
| 52 | Colonials | 1-2-3 | def. | Green Wave | 4-5-6 | ||
| 53 | Wolverines | 1-2-3 | def. | Aggies | 4-5-6 | ||
| 54 | Bulls | 1-2-5 | def. | Tritons | 3-4-6 | ||
| 55 | Colonials | 1-2-3 | def. | Aggies | 4-5-6 | ||
| 56 | Engineers | 1-2-3 | def. | Green Wave | 4-5-6 | ||
| 57 | Wolverines | 2-3-4 | def. | Captains | 1-5-6 | ||
| 58 | Bulls | 1-2-4 | def. | Captains | 3-5-6 | ||
| 59 | Engineers | 1-2-4 | def. | Aggies | 3-5-6 | ||
| 60 | Dolphins | 1-2-3 | def. | Green Wave | 4-5-6 | ||
| 61 | Tritons | 1-2-6 | def. | Wolverines | 3-4-5 | ||
| 62 | Bulls | 1-2-3 | def. | Aggies | 4-5-6 | ||
| 63 | Engineers | 1-2-5 | def. | Captains | 3-4-6 | ||
| 64 | Colonials | 1-2-5 | def. | Tritons | 3-4-6 | ||
| 65 | Wolverines | 1-2-5 | def. | Green Wave | 3-4-6 | ||
| 66 | Bulls | 1-2-3 | def. | Green Wave | 4-5-6 | ||
| 67 | Tritons | 1-2-3 | def. | Aggies | 4-5-6 | ||
| 68 | Colonials | 1-2-5 | def. | Captains | 3-4-6 | ||
| 69 | Engineers | 1-2-3 | def. | Dolphins | 4-5-6 | ||
| 70 | Colonials | 1-3-5 | def. | Dolphins | 2-4-6 | ||
| 71 | Tritons | 1-2-6 | def. | Captains | 3-4-5 | ||
| 72 | Aggies | 1-3-5 | def. | Green Wave | 2-4-6 | ||
| 73 | Dolphins | 1-2-3 | def. | Wolverines | 4-5-6 | ||
| 37 | Bulls | 1-4-5 | def. | Engineers | 2-3-6 | ||
Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.12 means a rating gap counts about 10% more than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.
Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.