The Mike Horn Trophy

# SchoolTeam Rec.
1 Boston College Boston College Eagles 4–1
2 Boston University Boston University Terriers 4–1
3 Brown University Brown University Bears 3–2
4 Harvard University Harvard University Crimson 2–3
5 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 1–4
6 Tufts University Tufts University Jumbos 1–4

Pre-event forecast

Fitted on the 9,186 team race matches sailed before 2017-11-04, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 8 of 10 matches (80%) with a log-loss of 0.587 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went about as expected for the forecast. Orderliness −0.31 ± 0.60: a typical event, more orderly than 19% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.

PlaceSchool Pred. Strength Boats (skipper / crew, boat value) Pred. win % Recordvs forecast
1Boston College
Eagles
18.60
school +0.24
Lily Mcgrath / Tara Ferraris 2.77
Colin Brego / Elizabeth Matheson 2.81
Thomas Walden / Caroline Downey 2.78
82%3–1 (75%)−0.3
2Boston University
Terriers
27.77
school −0.32
Kyle Dochoda / Emily Walker 3.02
Michael Sabourin / Megan Blagden 2.44
Grace Mooradian / Caroline Salas
64%3–1 (75%)+0.4
3Brown University
Bears
47.09
school +0.26
Rachel Foster / Grace Gagnon
Nathan Housberg / Sawyer Balint
John Mastrandrea / Lauren Haller 2.36
45%2–2 (50%)+0.2
4Harvard University
Crimson
55.43
school −0.13, home +0.41
Andrew Puopolo / Zennie Wey 2.14
Owen Schafer / Emily Malpass
Emma Jakobson / Tancredi Castellano Pucci Di Barsento
11%1–3 (25%)+0.6
6Tufts University
Jumbos
37.17
school +0.11
Wells Drayton / Marisa Permatteo 2.34
Leyla Senocak / Sabina Van Mell
Austen Freda / Duke Saunders 2.59
48%1–3 (25%)−0.9

Surprisal: who beat their rating

Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.

PlaceSchoolStrength Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
4Harvard University5.436.441–30.4+1.010.438%
2Boston University7.778.403–12.6+0.630.255%
3Brown University7.097.362–21.8+0.270.062%
1Boston College8.608.183–13.3−0.420.185%
6Tufts University7.175.811–31.9−1.370.996%

By skipper

SkipperSchoolValue Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
Andrew PuopoloHarvard University2.143.151–30.4+1.010.438%
Grace MooradianBoston University2.513.143–12.6+0.630.255%
Rachel FosterBrown University1.902.172–21.8+0.270.062%
Nathan HousbergBrown University2.432.702–21.8+0.270.062%
Leyla SenocakTufts University2.040.671–31.9−1.370.996%
Austen FredaTufts University2.591.221–31.9−1.370.996%

Match by match

Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).

Rd#WinnerLoser P(winner)
11Boston UniversityHarvard University92%
13Boston CollegeTufts University82%
14Boston UniversityBrown University69%
15Harvard UniversityTufts University15%upset
17Tufts UniversityBrown University54%
19Boston CollegeHarvard University96%
111Brown UniversityHarvard University82%
112Boston CollegeBoston University69%
114Boston UniversityTufts University65%
115Brown UniversityBoston College20%upset

Round 1

TeamRec.EaglesTerriersBearsCrimsonEngineersJumbos
Boston College Eagles4–1✕WLWWW
Boston University Terriers4–1L✕WWWW
Brown University Bears3–2WL✕WWL
Harvard University Crimson2–3LLL✕WW
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers1–4LLLL✕W
Tufts University Jumbos1–4LLWLL✕
# Winner Loser Pos.
1 Boston University Terriers 1-2-3 def. Harvard University Crimson 4-5-6
2 Brown University Bears 1-2-5 def. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 3-4-6
3 Boston College Eagles 1-2-3 def. Tufts University Jumbos 4-5-6
4 Boston University Terriers 1-3-4 def. Brown University Bears 2-5-6
5 Harvard University Crimson 2-3-5 def. Tufts University Jumbos 1-4-6
6 Boston College Eagles 1-2-6 def. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 3-4-5
7 Tufts University Jumbos 2-3-4 def. Brown University Bears 1-5-6
8 Boston University Terriers 1-2-5 def. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 3-4-6
9 Boston College Eagles 1-2-3 def. Harvard University Crimson 4-5-6
10 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 1-2-4 def. Tufts University Jumbos 3-5-6
11 Brown University Bears 1-2-5 def. Harvard University Crimson 3-4-6
12 Boston College Eagles 1-2-6 def. Boston University Terriers 3-4-5
13 Harvard University Crimson 1-2-3 def. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 4-5-6
14 Boston University Terriers 1-2-6 def. Tufts University Jumbos 3-4-5
15 Brown University Bears 1-2-6 def. Boston College Eagles 3-4-5

Conditions — 11/04/2017 (8am–6pm)

☁️Overcast
Humidity 60%  ·  Pressure 1027.8 hPa

Temperature

49°F
↑ 52°F   ↓ 43°F
Feels like 43°F

Wind

● from   ▲ toward
5.2 kn
avg  ·  max 8.2 kn
Gusts to 15.2 kn
From NE (50°)

Sky & Precipitation

Cloud cover84% Sunshine9.0 hrs Humidity60% Pressure1027.8 hPa

What this breeze does at Harvard — from fleet racing

Breeze: NE about 8 kn (weather reanalysis in the scorer’s units)
In fleet races at Harvard in this breeze: a favourites’ day (+0.04)
Favourites’ conditions: in fleet racing here the results follow the ratings more closely than usual, and the top seeds hold their places.

Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.04 means a rating gap counts about 4% more than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.

Orderliness beyond the fleet at Harvard by wind direction (angle) and speed (rings), fitted surface; dots are labelled regatta-days, ★ this regatta (59 labelled fleet-race days at Harvard).

From the notes

Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.

All notes →