John Jackson Memorial Team Race

# SchoolTeam Rec.
1 Stanford University Stanford University Cardinal 9–1
2 College of Charleston College of Charleston Cougars 7–3
3 Connecticut College Connecticut College Camels 6–4
4 Georgetown University Georgetown University Hoyas 5–5
5 SUNY Maritime College SUNY Maritime College Privateers 5–5
6 St. Mary's College of Maryland St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks 4–6
7 U. S. Naval Academy U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen 3–7
8 University of Virginia University of Virginia Wahoos 1–9

Pre-event forecast

Fitted on the 530 team race matches sailed before 2013-03-09, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 32 of 40 matches (80%) with a log-loss of 0.487 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went about as expected for the forecast. vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.

PlaceSchool Pred. Strength Boats (skipper / crew, boat value) Pred. win % Recordvs forecast
1Stanford University
Cardinal
210.98
school −0.17
Hans Henken / Samantha Steele
Antoine Screve / Rebecca King 3.20
Mateo Vargas / Tally Buckstaff
74%9–1 (90%)+1.6
2College of Charleston
Cougars
111.03
school +0.26
Christopher Banholzer / Tierney Driscoll 3.37
Jake Reynolds / Katie Dowling
Nick Johnstone / Emily Stuart 6–3
Ryan Davidson / Emily Stuart 1–0
74%7–3 (70%)−0.5
3Connecticut College
Camels
59.89
school +0.22
Peter Miller / Stephanie Kapinos 3.34
Kevin Martland / Grace Medley 3.37
Jordan Bothwick / Marina Sachs 2.60 4–2
Pearson Potts / Marina Sachs 3.31 2–2
49%6–4 (60%)+1.1
4Georgetown University
Hoyas
410.22
school +0.20, home +0.30
Matthew Gowell / Eliana Michaels
Sean Golden / Annalee Leggett 3.31
Michael Schalka / Courtney Sherman 2.99 1–5
Daniel Eichler / Courtney Sherman 3.26 4–0
53%5–5 (50%)−0.3
5SUNY Maritime College
Privateers
69.26
school −0.25
Harry Scott / Emma Lamontagne 3.44
Tyler Steel / Whitney Taylor 3.02
Nick Valente / Christopher Whalen 2.98
44%5–5 (50%)+0.5
6St. Mary's College of Maryland
Seahawks
310.01
school +0.56
Alexander Curtiss / Allison Shane 3.18
Ian Liberty / Rachel Ryan 3.00
Nicholas Clemence / Mariah Leffingwell 2.81
62%4–6 (40%)−2.2
7U. S. Naval Academy
Midshipmen
78.93
school +0.29
Connor Timmins / Sarah Blake
Michael Popp / Julia Mckenna
George Prieto / Chelsea Smith
38%3–7 (30%)−0.8
8University of Virginia
Wahoos
86.88
school +0.11
Christopher Stessing / Ellen Hubbard 2.55
Samuel Patterson / Alexandra Brenin 0.68
Gordon Wolcott / Sarah Hendrickson 3.27
6%1–9 (10%)+0.4

Surprisal: who beat their rating

Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.

PlaceSchoolStrength Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
1Stanford University10.9812.239–17.4+1.251.320%
8University of Virginia6.887.471–90.6+0.590.246%
3Connecticut College9.8910.486–44.9+0.580.533%
5SUNY Maritime College9.269.585–54.5+0.320.147%
4Georgetown University10.2210.095–55.3−0.140.071%
2College of Charleston11.0310.777–37.5−0.260.178%
7U. S. Naval Academy8.938.413–73.8−0.520.385%
6St. Mary's College of Maryland10.018.774–66.2−1.241.998%

By skipper

SkipperSchoolValue Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
Daniel EichlerGeorgetown University3.266.264–03.1≥+3.001.436%
Jordan BothwickConnecticut College2.604.044–22.5+1.441.614%
Hans HenkenStanford University3.765.019–17.4+1.251.320%
Antoine ScreveStanford University3.204.459–17.4+1.251.320%
Mateo VargasStanford University3.925.179–17.4+1.251.320%
Christopher StessingUniversity of Virginia2.553.141–90.6+0.590.246%
Samuel PattersonUniversity of Virginia0.681.271–90.6+0.590.246%
Gordon WolcottUniversity of Virginia3.273.871–90.6+0.590.246%
Peter MillerConnecticut College3.343.936–44.9+0.580.533%
Kevin MartlandConnecticut College3.373.956–44.9+0.580.533%
Harry ScottSUNY Maritime College3.443.765–54.5+0.320.147%
Tyler SteelSUNY Maritime College3.023.345–54.5+0.320.147%
Nick ValenteSUNY Maritime College2.983.305–54.5+0.320.147%
Matthew GowellGeorgetown University3.283.145–55.3−0.140.071%
Sean GoldenGeorgetown University3.313.175–55.3−0.140.071%
Christopher BanholzerCollege of Charleston3.373.117–37.5−0.260.178%
Jake ReynoldsCollege of Charleston3.833.567–37.5−0.260.178%
Nick JohnstoneCollege of Charleston2.942.636–36.5−0.310.180%
Connor TimminsU. S. Naval Academy2.341.823–73.8−0.520.385%
Michael PoppU. S. Naval Academy3.202.683–73.8−0.520.385%
George PrietoU. S. Naval Academy2.552.023–73.8−0.520.385%
Michael SchalkaGeorgetown University2.991.961–52.1−1.030.893%
Alexander CurtissSt. Mary's College of Maryland3.181.944–66.2−1.241.998%
Ian LibertySt. Mary's College of Maryland3.001.774–66.2−1.241.998%
Nicholas ClemenceSt. Mary's College of Maryland2.811.574–66.2−1.241.998%

Match by match

Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).

Rd#WinnerLoser P(winner)
11Connecticut CollegeCollege of Charleston30%upset
12Stanford UniversityGeorgetown University65%
13SUNY Maritime CollegeU. S. Naval Academy69%
14St. Mary's College of MarylandUniversity of Virginia95%
15Stanford UniversityCollege of Charleston54%
16Connecticut CollegeGeorgetown University54%
17St. Mary's College of MarylandU. S. Naval Academy75%
18University of VirginiaSUNY Maritime College8%upset
19College of CharlestonGeorgetown University68%
110Connecticut CollegeU. S. Naval Academy69%
111Stanford UniversitySUNY Maritime College84%
112College of CharlestonUniversity of Virginia98%
113St. Mary's College of MarylandConnecticut College40%upset
114Georgetown UniversityU. S. Naval Academy81%
115Stanford UniversityUniversity of Virginia98%
116College of CharlestonSUNY Maritime College86%
117Georgetown UniversitySt. Mary's College of Maryland60%
118Connecticut CollegeUniversity of Virginia94%
119Stanford UniversityU. S. Naval Academy88%
120College of CharlestonSt. Mary's College of Maryland74%
121Georgetown UniversityUniversity of Virginia97%
122Connecticut CollegeSUNY Maritime College74%
123Stanford UniversitySt. Mary's College of Maryland72%
124College of CharlestonU. S. Naval Academy93%
125Georgetown UniversitySUNY Maritime College75%
126Stanford UniversityConnecticut College81%
127U. S. Naval AcademyUniversity of Virginia89%
128SUNY Maritime CollegeSt. Mary's College of Maryland30%upset
157Georgetown UniversityConnecticut College45%upset
158College of CharlestonGeorgetown University74%
159Stanford UniversityGeorgetown University71%
160Connecticut CollegeCollege of Charleston17%upset
161Stanford UniversityConnecticut College81%
162College of CharlestonStanford University53%
163SUNY Maritime CollegeSt. Mary's College of Maryland29%upset
164U. S. Naval AcademySt. Mary's College of Maryland25%upset
165St. Mary's College of MarylandUniversity of Virginia96%
166SUNY Maritime CollegeU. S. Naval Academy53%
167SUNY Maritime CollegeUniversity of Virginia91%
168U. S. Naval AcademyUniversity of Virginia90%

Round 1

TeamRec.CardinalCougarsCamelsHoyasPrivateersSeahawksMidshipmenWahoos
Stanford University Cardinal9–1✕LWWWWWW
College of Charleston Cougars7–3W✕LWWWWW
Connecticut College Camels6–4LW✕LWLWW
Georgetown University Hoyas5–5LLW✕WWWW
SUNY Maritime College Privateers5–5LLLL✕WWW
St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks4–6LLWLL✕LW
U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen3–7LLLLLW✕W
University of Virginia Wahoos1–9LLLLLLL✕
# Winner Loser Pos.
1 Connecticut College Camels 1-2-5 def. College of Charleston Cougars 3-4-6
2 Stanford University Cardinal 1-2-5 def. Georgetown University Hoyas 3-4-6
3 SUNY Maritime College Privateers 2-3-4 def. U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen 1-5-6
4 St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks 1-2-6 def. University of Virginia Wahoos 3-4-5
5 Stanford University Cardinal 1-2-3 def. College of Charleston Cougars 4-5-6
6 Connecticut College Camels 1-2-5 def. Georgetown University Hoyas 3-4-6
7 St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks 1-2-5 def. U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen 3-4-6
8 University of Virginia Wahoos 1-3-5 def. SUNY Maritime College Privateers 2-4-6
9 College of Charleston Cougars 2-3-5 def. Georgetown University Hoyas 1-4-6
10 Connecticut College Camels 1-2-3 def. U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen 4-5-6
11 Stanford University Cardinal 1-2-5 def. SUNY Maritime College Privateers 3-4-6
12 College of Charleston Cougars 1-2-3 def. University of Virginia Wahoos 4-5-6
13 St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks 1-3-4 def. Connecticut College Camels 2-5-6
14 Georgetown University Hoyas 1-2-5 def. U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen 3-4-6
15 Stanford University Cardinal 1-4-5 def. University of Virginia Wahoos 2-3-6
16 College of Charleston Cougars 1-2-6 def. SUNY Maritime College Privateers 3-4-5
17 Georgetown University Hoyas 1-2-5 def. St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks 3-4-6
18 Connecticut College Camels 1-2-4 def. University of Virginia Wahoos 3-5-6
19 Stanford University Cardinal 1-2-6 def. U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen 3-4-5
20 College of Charleston Cougars 2-3-4 def. St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks 1-5-6
21 Georgetown University Hoyas 1-2-4 def. University of Virginia Wahoos 3-5-6
22 Connecticut College Camels 1-2-6 def. SUNY Maritime College Privateers 3-4-5
23 Stanford University Cardinal 1-2-3 def. St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks 4-5-6
24 College of Charleston Cougars 1-2-4 def. U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen 3-5-6
25 Georgetown University Hoyas 2-3-4 def. SUNY Maritime College Privateers 1-5-6
26 Stanford University Cardinal 1-2-6 def. Connecticut College Camels 3-4-5
27 U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen 2-3-4 def. University of Virginia Wahoos 1-5-6
28 SUNY Maritime College Privateers 1-2-6 def. St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks 3-4-5
57 Georgetown University Hoyas 1-2-4 def. Connecticut College Camels 3-5-6
58 College of Charleston Cougars 1-2-5 def. Georgetown University Hoyas 3-4-6
59 Stanford University Cardinal 1-2-3 def. Georgetown University Hoyas 4-5-6
60 Connecticut College Camels 2-3-5 def. College of Charleston Cougars 1-4-6
61 Stanford University Cardinal 1-3-5 def. Connecticut College Camels 2-4-6
62 College of Charleston Cougars 1-2-4 def. Stanford University Cardinal 3-5-6
63 SUNY Maritime College Privateers 1-2-6 def. St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks 3-4-5
64 U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen 1-2-5 def. St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks 3-4-6
65 St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks 2-3-4 def. University of Virginia Wahoos 1-5-6
66 SUNY Maritime College Privateers 2-3-5 def. U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen 1-4-6
67 SUNY Maritime College Privateers 1-2-5 def. University of Virginia Wahoos 3-4-6
68 U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen 1-2-5 def. University of Virginia Wahoos 3-4-6

Conditions — 03/09/2013 (8am–6pm)

☀️Clear sky
Humidity 48%  ·  Pressure 1026.2 hPa

Temperature

48°F
↑ 58°F   ↓ 32°F
Feels like 43°F

Wind

● from   ▲ toward
4.1 kn
avg  ·  max 6.5 kn
Gusts to 15.7 kn
From NNW (338°)

Sky & Precipitation

Cloud cover0% Sunshine10.2 hrs Humidity48% Pressure1026.2 hPa

What this breeze does at Georgetown — from fleet racing

Breeze: N about 7 kn (weather reanalysis in the scorer’s units)
In fleet races at Georgetown in this breeze: a favourites’ day (+0.03)
Favourites’ conditions: in fleet racing here the results follow the ratings more closely than usual, and the top seeds hold their places.

Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.03 means a rating gap counts about 3% more than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.

Orderliness beyond the fleet at Georgetown by wind direction (angle) and speed (rings), fitted surface; dots are labelled regatta-days, ★ this regatta (27 labelled fleet-race days at Georgetown).

From the notes

Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.

All notes →