| # | School | Team | Rec. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harvard University | Crimson | 12–2 | |
| 2 | Yale University | Bulldogs | 12–2 | |
| 3 | Brown University | Bears 1 | 9–5 | |
| 4 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Engineers | 8–6 | |
| 5 | Roger Williams University | Hawks | 7–7 | |
| 6 | Boston College | Eagles | 5–9 | |
| 7 | Brown University | Bears 2 | 3–11 | |
| 8 | University of Rhode Island | Rams | 0–14 |
Each side is the sum of its three boats (the skipper's fleet rating times 0.72 plus a team race offset learned from their past matches, plus the crew's offset and a small experience term) plus the school's team race strength and a home-water edge for the host. The win probability is a logistic function of the difference. The forecast was made before the event: the model was refitted on every match sailed before the first day, with fleet ratings as of the week before.
Fitted on the 22,017 team race matches sailed before 2024-03-02, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 43 of 56 matches (77%) with a log-loss of 0.488 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went about as expected for the forecast. Orderliness +0.05 ± 0.26: a typical event, more orderly than 48% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.
For each side, the performance strength is the value that would have made its record least surprising: the strength at which the model's expected wins over exactly these opponents equal the actual wins, with every opponent fixed at its pre-event strength. For a skipper, the same shift is applied only to their boat in the matches they sailed, with team-mates and opponents fixed; team-mates who sailed every match together therefore get the same number. Surprise is in bits: -log2 of the probability of the record at the pre-event strength minus the same at the performance strength. P(this good or better) treats matches as independent coin flips at the model's pre-event probabilities, so it ignores form within the day; read it as a rough guide.
Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.
| Place | School | Strength | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins | Δ | Surprise (bits) | P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers | 9.24 | 11.12 | 8–6 | 3.2 | +1.87 | 6.7 | <1% |
| 2 | Yale University Bulldogs | 11.34 | 12.67 | 12–2 | 9.3 | +1.33 | 2.4 | 8% |
| 1 | Harvard University Crimson | 11.80 | 12.46 | 12–2 | 10.8 | +0.66 | 0.5 | 32% |
| 6 | Boston College Eagles | 10.09 | 9.76 | 5–9 | 5.8 | −0.33 | 0.2 | 80% |
| 5 | Roger Williams University Hawks | 11.01 | 10.49 | 7–7 | 8.3 | −0.51 | 0.5 | 88% |
| 3 | Brown University Bears 1 | 11.95 | 11.10 | 9–5 | 11.0 | −0.85 | 1.3 | 95% |
| 7 | Brown University Bears 2 | 10.03 | 9.00 | 3–11 | 5.2 | −1.03 | 1.6 | 97% |
| 8 | University of Rhode Island Rams | 8.78 | 5.78 | 0–14 | 2.3 | ≤−3.00 | 3.6 | >99% |
| Skipper | School | Value | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins | Δ | Surprise (bits) | P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Joslin | Boston College | 3.08 | 2.75 | 5–9 | 5.8 | −0.33 | 0.2 | 80% |
| Aidan Hoogland | Roger Williams University | 3.61 | 3.10 | 7–7 | 8.3 | −0.51 | 0.5 | 88% |
| Carlos De Castro | Roger Williams University | 3.83 | 3.32 | 7–7 | 8.3 | −0.51 | 0.5 | 88% |
| Lachlain Mcgranahan | Harvard University | 3.83 | 2.94 | 2–2 | 2.5 | −0.89 | 0.3 | 93% |
| Kerem Erkmen | University of Rhode Island | 3.58 | 0.58 | 0–14 | 2.3 | ≤−3.00 | 3.6 | >99% |
Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).
| Team | Rec. | Crimson | Bulldogs | 1 | Engineers | Hawks | Eagles | 2 | Rams | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvard University Crimson | 5–2 | ✕ | L | W | W | W | L | W | W | |
| Yale University Bulldogs | 7–0 | W | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Brown University Bears 1 | 7–7 | L | L | ✕ | L | W | W | ✕ | W | |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers | 4–3 | L | L | W | ✕ | W | W | W | W | |
| Roger Williams University Hawks | 3–4 | L | L | L | L | ✕ | W | L | W | |
| Boston College Eagles | 2–5 | W | L | L | L | L | ✕ | L | W | |
| Brown University Bears 2 | 7–7 | L | L | ✕ | L | W | W | ✕ | W | |
| University of Rhode Island Rams | 0–7 | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Crimson | Bulldogs | 1 | Engineers | Hawks | Eagles | 2 | Rams | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvard University Crimson | 7–0 | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Yale University Bulldogs | 5–2 | L | ✕ | W | W | L | W | W | W | |
| Brown University Bears 1 | 5–9 | L | L | ✕ | L | W | W | ✕ | W | |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers | 4–3 | L | L | W | ✕ | W | L | W | W | |
| Roger Williams University Hawks | 4–3 | L | W | L | L | ✕ | W | L | W | |
| Boston College Eagles | 3–4 | L | L | L | W | L | ✕ | L | W | |
| Brown University Bears 2 | 5–9 | L | L | ✕ | L | W | W | ✕ | W | |
| University of Rhode Island Rams | 0–7 | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ |
| # | Winner | Loser | Pos. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Crimson | 1-2-3 | def. | Engineers | 4-5-6 | ||
| 2 | Hawks | 1-2-3 | def. | Bears 2 | 4-5-6 | ||
| 3 | Bears 1 | 1-2-3 | def. | Rams | 4-5-6 | ||
| 4 | Bulldogs | 1-2-3 | def. | Eagles | 4-5-6 | ||
| 5 | Crimson | 1-2-6 | def. | Bears 2 | 3-4-5 | ||
| 6 | Bears 1 | 1-2-3 | def. | Engineers | 4-5-6 | ||
| 7 | Bulldogs | 2-3-4 | def. | Hawks | 1-5-6 | ||
| 8 | Eagles | 1-2-3 | def. | Rams | 4-5-6 | ||
| 9 | Bears 1 | 1-2-3 | def. | Bears 2 | 4-5-6 | ||
| 10 | Bulldogs | 1-4-5 | def. | Crimson | 2-3-6 | ||
| 11 | Engineers | 1-2-6 | def. | Rams | 3-4-5 | ||
| 12 | Hawks | 1-2-6 | def. | Eagles | 3-4-5 | ||
| 13 | Bulldogs | 1-2-6 DSQ | def. | Bears 1 | 3-4-5 DSQ | ||
| 14 | Bears 2 | 1-4-5 | def. | Rams | 2-3-6 | ||
| 15 | Crimson | 1-2-4 | def. | Hawks | 3-5-6 | ||
| 16 | Engineers | 1-3-5 | def. | Eagles | 2-4-6 | ||
| 17 | Bulldogs | 1-2-3 | def. | Rams | 4-5-6 | ||
| 18 | Bears 1 | 2-3-4 | def. | Hawks | 1-5-6 | ||
| 19 | Engineers | 1-2-6 | def. | Bears 2 | 3-4-5 | ||
| 20 | Eagles | 1-2-6 | def. | Crimson | 3-4-5 | ||
| 21 | Hawks | 1-2-6 | def. | Rams | 3-4-5 | ||
| 22 | Bulldogs | 2-3-4 | def. | Engineers | 1-5-6 | ||
| 23 | Crimson | 2-4-6 | def. | Bears 1 | 1-3-5 DSQ | ||
| 24 | Bears 2 | 1-4-5 | def. | Eagles | 2-3-6 | ||
| 25 | Engineers | 1-3-6 | def. | Hawks | 2-4-5 | ||
| 26 | Crimson | 1-2-5 | def. | Rams | 3-4-6 | ||
| 27 | Bulldogs | 1-2-3 | def. | Bears 2 | 4-5-6 | ||
| 28 | Bears 1 | 1-3-4 | def. | Eagles | 2-5-6 | ||
| 29 | Crimson | 2-3-4 | def. | Engineers | 1-5-6 | ||
| 30 | Hawks | 2-3-4 | def. | Bears 2 | 1-5-6 | ||
| 31 | Bears 1 | 1-2-5 | def. | Rams | 3-4-6 | ||
| 32 | Bulldogs | 1-2-3 | def. | Eagles | 4-5-6 | ||
| 33 | Crimson | 2-3-4 | def. | Bears 2 | 1-5-6 | ||
| 34 | Engineers | 1-2-5 | def. | Bears 1 | 3-4-6 | ||
| 35 | Hawks | 1-4-5 | def. | Bulldogs | 2-3-6 | ||
| 36 | Eagles | 1-3-5 | def. | Rams | 2-4-6 | ||
| 37 | Bears 1 | 1-2-5 | def. | Bears 2 | 3-4-6 | ||
| 38 | Crimson | 1-2-5 | def. | Bulldogs | 3-4-6 | ||
| 39 | Engineers | 2-3-4 | def. | Rams | 1-5-6 | ||
| 40 | Hawks | 1-2-4 | def. | Eagles | 3-5-6 | ||
| 41 | Bulldogs | 1-2-6 | def. | Bears 1 | 3-4-5 | ||
| 42 | Bears 2 | 2-3-4 | def. | Rams | 1-5-6 | ||
| 43 | Crimson | 2-3-4 | def. | Hawks | 1-5-6 | ||
| 44 | Eagles | 2-3-4 | def. | Engineers | 1-5-6 | ||
| 45 | Bulldogs | 1-2-3 | def. | Rams | 4-5-6 | ||
| 46 | Bears 1 | 2-3-4 | def. | Hawks | 1-5-6 | ||
| 47 | Engineers | 1-2-3 | def. | Bears 2 | 4-5-6 | ||
| 48 | Crimson | 1-2-3 | def. | Eagles | 4-5-6 | ||
| 49 | Hawks | 1-2-6 | def. | Rams | 3-4-5 | ||
| 50 | Bulldogs | 1-2-3 | def. | Engineers | 4-5-6 | ||
| 51 | Crimson | 1-2-4 | def. | Bears 1 | 3-5-6 | ||
| 52 | Eagles | 1-2-6 | def. | Bears 2 | 3-4-5 | ||
| 53 | Engineers | 1-5-6 | def. | Hawks | 2-3-4 DSQ | ||
| 54 | Crimson | 1-2-5 | def. | Rams | 3-4-6 | ||
| 55 | Bulldogs | 1-2-4 | def. | Bears 2 | 3-5-6 | ||
| 56 | Bears 1 | 1-2-6 | def. | Eagles | 3-4-5 | ||
Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.06 means a rating gap counts about 5% more than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.
Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.