| # | School | Team | Rec. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Engineers | 14–4 | |
| 2 | Boston College | Eagles | 13–5 | |
| 3 | College of Charleston | Cougars | 10–8 | |
| 4 | St. Mary's College of Maryland | Seahawks | 10–8 | |
| 5 | George Washington University | Colonials | 7–8 | |
| 6 | Tulane University | Green Wave | 6–9 | |
| 7 | Cornell University | Big Red | 10–4 | |
| 8 | Georgetown University | Hoyas | 5–9 | |
| 8 | Tufts University | Jumbos | 5–9 | |
| 10 | Hobart and William Smith Colleges | Statesmen | 4–10 | |
| 11 | Fordham University | Rams | 2–12 |
Each side is the sum of its three boats (the skipper's fleet rating times 0.72 plus a team race offset learned from their past matches, plus the crew's offset and a small experience term) plus the school's team race strength and a home-water edge for the host. The win probability is a logistic function of the difference. The forecast was made before the event: the model was refitted on every match sailed before the first day, with fleet ratings as of the week before.
Fitted on the 17,267 team race matches sailed before 2022-03-26, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 55 of 92 matches (60%) with a log-loss of 0.629 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went poorly for the forecast. Orderliness −0.36 ± 0.22: an upset-heavy event, more orderly than 15% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.
For each side, the performance strength is the value that would have made its record least surprising: the strength at which the model's expected wins over exactly these opponents equal the actual wins, with every opponent fixed at its pre-event strength. For a skipper, the same shift is applied only to their boat in the matches they sailed, with team-mates and opponents fixed; team-mates who sailed every match together therefore get the same number. Surprise is in bits: -log2 of the probability of the record at the pre-event strength minus the same at the performance strength. P(this good or better) treats matches as independent coin flips at the model's pre-event probabilities, so it ignores form within the day; read it as a rough guide.
Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.
| Place | School | Strength | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins | Δ | Surprise (bits) | P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | College of Charleston | 7.04 | 8.18 | 12–9 | 7.1 | +1.14 | 4.1 | 2% |
| 4 | St. Mary's College of Maryland | 7.40 | 8.05 | 10–8 | 7.6 | +0.65 | 1.1 | 16% |
| 1 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | 8.56 | 9.06 | 14–4 | 12.5 | +0.50 | 0.5 | 30% |
| 5 | George Washington University | 7.07 | 7.52 | 8–10 | 6.4 | +0.45 | 0.5 | 27% |
| 11 | Fordham University | 5.47 | 5.69 | 2–12 | 1.7 | +0.22 | 0.1 | 51% |
| 7 | Cornell University | 7.57 | 7.73 | 10–7 | 9.5 | +0.16 | 0.1 | 49% |
| 8 | Tufts University | 7.10 | 6.68 | 5–9 | 6.2 | −0.43 | 0.4 | 84% |
| 2 | Boston College | 9.10 | 8.59 | 13–5 | 14.5 | −0.52 | 0.6 | 89% |
| 10 | Hobart and William Smith Colleges | 6.93 | 6.30 | 4–10 | 5.6 | −0.63 | 0.7 | 90% |
| 8 | Georgetown University | 7.61 | 6.58 | 5–9 | 7.8 | −1.04 | 2.1 | 98% |
| 6 | Tulane University | 8.66 | 7.49 | 9–9 | 13.2 | −1.17 | 3.7 | 99% |
| Skipper | School | Value | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins | Δ | Surprise (bits) | P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fredrikke Foss | College of Charleston | 1.99 | 3.13 | 12–9 | 7.1 | +1.14 | 4.1 | 2% |
| Kiera Oreardon | College of Charleston | 2.35 | 3.49 | 12–9 | 7.1 | +1.14 | 4.1 | 2% |
| Lily Flack | St. Mary's College of Maryland | 1.51 | 2.16 | 10–8 | 7.6 | +0.65 | 1.1 | 16% |
| Brooke Shachoy | Cornell University | 2.68 | 3.18 | 14–4 | 12.5 | +0.50 | 0.5 | 30% |
| Chiara Perotti Correa | George Washington University | 2.36 | 2.81 | 8–10 | 6.4 | +0.45 | 0.5 | 27% |
| Abbie Carlson | Tufts University | 2.37 | 1.94 | 5–9 | 6.2 | −0.43 | 0.4 | 84% |
| Alexandra Talbot | Tufts University | 2.21 | 1.78 | 5–9 | 6.2 | −0.43 | 0.4 | 84% |
| Mia Hanes | Tulane University | 2.54 | 1.37 | 9–9 | 13.2 | −1.17 | 3.7 | 99% |
| Ciara Rodriguez-Horan | Tulane University | 3.27 | 2.11 | 9–9 | 13.2 | −1.17 | 3.7 | 99% |
Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).
| Team | Rec. | Engineers | Eagles | Cougars | Seahawks | Colonials | Wave | Red | Hoyas | Jumbos | Statesmen | Rams | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers | 7–3 | ✕ | W | L | W | L | W | L | W | W | W | W | |
| Boston College Eagles | 7–3 | L | ✕ | W | L | L | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| College of Charleston Cougars | 8–5 | W | L | ✕ | W | W | L | W | L | W | W | W | |
| St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks | 7–3 | L | W | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | L | W | W | |
| George Washington University Colonials | 7–6 | W | W | L | L | ✕ | L | W | W | L | W | L | |
| Tulane University Green Wave | 9–4 | L | L | W | L | W | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Cornell University Big Red | 6–7 | W | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | |
| Georgetown University Hoyas | 2–8 | L | L | W | L | L | L | L | ✕ | L | L | W | |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 4–6 | L | L | L | W | W | L | L | W | ✕ | L | W | |
| Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen | 2–8 | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | W | W | ✕ | L | |
| Fordham University Rams | 2–8 | L | L | L | L | W | L | L | L | L | W | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Engineers | Eagles | Cougars | Seahawks | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers | 3–0 | ✕ | W | W | W | |
| Boston College Eagles | 1–2 | L | ✕ | W | L | |
| College of Charleston Cougars | 1–2 | L | L | ✕ | W | |
| St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks | 1–2 | L | W | L | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Red | Hoyas | Jumbos | Statesmen | Rams | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cornell University Big Red | 4–0 | ✕ | W | W | W | W | |
| Georgetown University Hoyas | 3–1 | L | ✕ | W | W | W | |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 1–3 | L | L | ✕ | L | W | |
| Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen | 2–2 | L | L | W | ✕ | W | |
| Fordham University Rams | 0–4 | L | L | L | L | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Engineers | Eagles | Cougars | Seahawks | Colonials | Wave | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers | 4–1 | ✕ | L | W | W | W | W | |
| Boston College Eagles | 5–0 | W | ✕ | W | W | W | W | |
| College of Charleston Cougars | 3–2 | L | L | ✕ | W | W | W | |
| St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks | 2–3 | L | L | L | ✕ | W | W | |
| George Washington University Colonials | 1–4 | L | L | L | L | ✕ | W | |
| Tulane University Green Wave | 0–5 | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ |
| # | Winner | Loser | Pos. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Seahawks | 1-4-5 | def. | Big Red | 2-3-6 | ||
| 2 | Engineers | 1-3-5 | def. | Hoyas | 2-4-6 | ||
| 3 | Colonials | 1-3-5 | def. | Eagles | 2-4-6 | ||
| 4 | Cougars | 1-2-5 | def. | Rams | 3-4-6 | ||
| 5 | Statesmen | 2-3-5 | def. | Jumbos | 1-4-6 | ||
| 6 | Big Red | 1-3-6 | def. | Hoyas | 2-4-5 | ||
| 7 | Eagles | 1-2-6 | def. | Green Wave | 3-4-5 | ||
| 8 | Engineers | 2-3-4 | def. | Rams | 1-5-6 | ||
| 9 | Cougars | 1-2-5 | def. | Seahawks | 3-4-6 | ||
| 10 | Jumbos | 2-3-4 | def. | Colonials | 1-5-6 | ||
| 11 | Eagles | 1-2-3 | def. | Statesmen | 4-5-6 | ||
| 12 | Big Red | 1-2-3 | def. | Rams | 4-5-6 | ||
| 13 | Cougars | 1-3-4 | def. | Engineers | 2-5-6 | ||
| 14 | Seahawks | 1-2-5 | def. | Hoyas | 3-4-6 | ||
| 15 | Green Wave | 2-3-4 | def. | Jumbos | 1-5-6 | ||
| 16 | Colonials | 2-3-4 | def. | Statesmen | 1-5-6 | ||
| 17 | Big Red | 1-2-3 | def. | Engineers | 4-5-6 | ||
| 18 | Seahawks | 1-2-4 | def. | Rams | 3-5-6 | ||
| 19 | Hoyas | 1-2-6 | def. | Cougars | 3-4-5 | ||
| 20 | Eagles | 1-3-6 | def. | Jumbos | 2-4-5 | ||
| 21 | Green Wave | 1-3-6 | def. | Colonials | 2-4-5 | ||
| 22 | Engineers | 1-2-3 | def. | Seahawks | 4-5-6 | ||
| 23 | Cougars | 1-4-5 | def. | Big Red | 2-3-6 | ||
| 24 | Hoyas | 1-3-5 | def. | Rams | 2-4-6 | ||
| 25 | Green Wave | 1-4-5 | def. | Statesmen | 2-3-6 | ||
| 26 | Seahawks | 1-3-6 | def. | Eagles | 2-4-5 | ||
| 27 | Colonials | 1-2-6 | def. | Engineers | 3-4-5 | ||
| 28 | Jumbos | 1-3-4 | def. | Rams | 2-5-6 | ||
| 29 | Big Red | 1-2-4 | def. | Statesmen | 3-5-6 | ||
| 30 | Green Wave | 1-2-3 | def. | Cougars | 4-5-6 | ||
| 31 | Colonials | 1-2-3 | def. | Hoyas | 4-5-6 | ||
| 32 | Jumbos | 1-2-5 | def. | Seahawks | 3-4-6 | ||
| 33 | Eagles | 1-2-6 | def. | Big Red | 3-4-5 | ||
| 34 | Green Wave | 1-2-3 | def. | Rams | 4-5-6 | ||
| 35 | Colonials | 2-3-5 | def. | Cougars | 1-4-6 | ||
| 36 | Statesmen | 1-3-5 | def. | Hoyas | 2-4-6 | ||
| 37 | Engineers | 1-2-5 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-6 | ||
| 38 | Eagles | 1-3-4 | def. | Rams | 2-5-6 | ||
| 39 | Colonials | 1-2-6 | def. | Big Red | 3-4-5 | ||
| 40 | Green Wave | 1-2-5 | def. | Hoyas | 3-4-6 | ||
| 41 | Seahawks | 1-2-5 | def. | Statesmen | 3-4-6 | ||
| 42 | Cougars | 1-2-3 | def. | Jumbos | 4-5-6 | ||
| 43 | Engineers | 1-2-6 | def. | Eagles | 3-4-5 | ||
| 44 | Big Red | 1-3-6 | def. | Green Wave | 2-4-5 | ||
| 45 | Rams | 1-4-5 | def. | Statesmen | 2-3-6 | ||
| 46 | Jumbos | 2-3-5 | def. | Hoyas | 1-4-6 | ||
| 47 | Eagles | 1-2-6 | def. | Cougars | 3-4-5 | ||
| 48 | Engineers | 1-2-5 | def. | Green Wave | 3-4-6 | ||
| 49 | Seahawks | 1-3-6 | def. | Colonials | 2-4-5 | ||
| 50 | Big Red | 1-2-3 | def. | Jumbos | 4-5-6 | ||
| 51 | Cougars | 2-3-4 | def. | Statesmen | 1-5-6 | ||
| 52 | Eagles | 1-2-6 | def. | Hoyas | 3-4-5 | ||
| 53 | Seahawks | 1-3-6 | def. | Green Wave | 2-4-5 | ||
| 54 | Rams | 1-4-5 | def. | Colonials | 2-3-6 | ||
| 55 | Engineers | 1-2-4 | def. | Statesmen | 3-5-6 | ||
| 56 | Cougars | 2-3-5 | def. | Big Red | 1-4-6 | ||
| 57 | Green Wave | 1-4-5 | def. | Colonials | 2-3-6 | ||
| 58 | Colonials | 2-3-5 | def. | Big Red | 1-4-6 | ||
| 59 | Green Wave | 1-2-6 | def. | Cougars | 3-4-5 | ||
| 60 | Cougars | 1-2-6 | def. | Colonials | 3-4-5 | ||
| 61 | Green Wave | 2-3-4 | def. | Big Red | 1-5-6 | ||
| 87 | Engineers | 1-3-6 | def. | Seahawks | 2-4-5 | ||
| 88 | Eagles | 1-2-3 | def. | Cougars | 4-5-6 | ||
| 89 | Engineers | 1-2-5 | def. | Cougars | 3-4-6 | ||
| 90 | Seahawks | 1-3-6 | def. | Eagles | 2-4-5 | ||
| 91 | Cougars | 2-3-5 | def. | Seahawks | 1-4-6 | ||
| 92 | Engineers | 1-4-5 | def. | Eagles | 2-3-6 | ||
| 64 | Statesmen | 1-2-5 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-6 | ||
| 65 | Big Red | 1-2-6 | def. | Hoyas | 3-4-5 | ||
| 68 | Jumbos | 1-2-3 | def. | Rams | 4-5-6 | ||
| 69 | Big Red | 1-2-6 | def. | Statesmen | 3-4-5 | ||
| 72 | Hoyas | 1-3-4 | def. | Rams | 2-5-6 | ||
| 73 | Big Red | 1-2-3 | def. | Jumbos | 4-5-6 | ||
| 76 | Hoyas | 1-3-5 | def. | Statesmen | 2-4-6 | ||
| 77 | Big Red | 1-2-4 | def. | Rams | 3-5-6 | ||
| 80 | Hoyas | 1-3-6 | def. | Jumbos | 2-4-5 | ||
| 81 | Statesmen | 1-3-5 | def. | Rams | 2-4-6 | ||
| 62 | Eagles | 1-2-4 | def. | Green Wave | 3-5-6 | ||
| 63 | Cougars | 1-3-4 | def. | Seahawks | 2-5-6 | ||
| 66 | Engineers | 1-2-5 | def. | Colonials | 3-4-6 | ||
| 67 | Eagles | 1-2-6 | def. | Seahawks | 3-4-5 | ||
| 70 | Colonials | 1-2-6 | def. | Green Wave | 3-4-5 | ||
| 71 | Engineers | 1-3-5 | def. | Cougars | 2-4-6 | ||
| 74 | Seahawks | 2-3-4 | def. | Colonials | 1-5-6 | ||
| 75 | Eagles | 1-3-5 | def. | Cougars | 2-4-6 | ||
| 78 | Engineers | 1-2-5 | def. | Green Wave | 3-4-6 | ||
| 79 | Cougars | 1-4-5 | def. | Colonials | 2-3-6 | ||
| 82 | Seahawks | 1-3-4 | def. | Green Wave | 2-5-6 | ||
| 83 | Eagles | 2-3-4 | def. | Engineers | 1-5-6 | ||
| 84 | Cougars | 1-4-5 | def. | Green Wave | 2-3-6 | ||
| 85 | Eagles | 1-2-4 | def. | Colonials | 3-5-6 | ||
| 86 | Engineers | 1-2-6 | def. | Seahawks | 3-4-5 | ||
Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.05 means a rating gap counts about 5% more than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.
Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.