| # | School | Team | Rec. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yale University | Bulldogs | 13–2 | |
| 2 | Stanford University | Cardinal | 12–3 | |
| 3 | Brown University | Bears | 8–7 | |
| 4 | Harvard University | Crimson | 7–8 | |
| 5 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Engineers | 8–6 | |
| 6 | College of Charleston | Cougars | 7–7 | |
| 7 | Dartmouth College | Big Green | 6–8 | |
| 8 | Tulane University | Green Wave | 5–9 | |
| 9 | Cornell University | Big Red | 5–9 | |
| 10 | Tufts University | Jumbos | 1–13 |
Each side is the sum of its three boats (the skipper's fleet rating times 0.72 plus a team race offset learned from their past matches, plus the crew's offset and a small experience term) plus the school's team race strength and a home-water edge for the host. The win probability is a logistic function of the difference. The forecast was made before the event: the model was refitted on every match sailed before the first day, with fleet ratings as of the week before.
Fitted on the 26,645 team race matches sailed before 2025-03-29, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 55 of 72 matches (76%) with a log-loss of 0.467 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went about as expected for the forecast. Orderliness +0.17 ± 0.24: a typical event, more orderly than 62% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.
For each side, the performance strength is the value that would have made its record least surprising: the strength at which the model's expected wins over exactly these opponents equal the actual wins, with every opponent fixed at its pre-event strength. For a skipper, the same shift is applied only to their boat in the matches they sailed, with team-mates and opponents fixed; team-mates who sailed every match together therefore get the same number. Surprise is in bits: -log2 of the probability of the record at the pre-event strength minus the same at the performance strength. P(this good or better) treats matches as independent coin flips at the model's pre-event probabilities, so it ignores form within the day; read it as a rough guide.
Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.
| Place | School | Strength | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins | Δ | Surprise (bits) | P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Harvard University | 9.22 | 10.01 | 7–8 | 5.2 | +0.78 | 1.0 | 18% |
| 5 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | 8.84 | 9.36 | 8–6 | 6.6 | +0.52 | 0.5 | 30% |
| 2 | Stanford University | 11.37 | 11.63 | 12–3 | 11.5 | +0.25 | 0.1 | 52% |
| 1 | Yale University | 11.87 | 11.96 | 13–2 | 12.9 | +0.09 | 0.0 | 64% |
| 7 | Dartmouth College | 8.62 | 8.66 | 6–8 | 5.9 | +0.05 | 0.0 | 59% |
| 9 | Cornell University | 8.30 | 8.34 | 5–9 | 4.9 | +0.04 | 0.0 | 59% |
| 6 | College of Charleston | 8.90 | 8.84 | 7–7 | 7.2 | −0.06 | 0.0 | 66% |
| 8 | Tulane University | 8.70 | 8.28 | 5–9 | 6.1 | −0.42 | 0.3 | 84% |
| 3 | Brown University | 10.54 | 10.06 | 8–7 | 9.1 | −0.48 | 0.4 | 86% |
| 10 | Tufts University | 7.55 | 6.38 | 1–13 | 2.7 | −1.16 | 1.2 | 95% |
| Skipper | School | Value | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins | Δ | Surprise (bits) | P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cordelia Burn | Harvard University | 3.16 | 3.94 | 7–8 | 5.2 | +0.78 | 1.0 | 18% |
| Brooke Barry | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | 2.40 | 2.92 | 8–6 | 6.6 | +0.52 | 0.5 | 30% |
| Ellie Harned | Stanford University | 3.36 | 3.62 | 12–3 | 11.5 | +0.25 | 0.1 | 52% |
| Carmen Cowles | Yale University | 3.62 | 3.71 | 13–2 | 12.9 | +0.09 | 0.0 | 64% |
| Emma Cowles | Yale University | 3.86 | 3.95 | 13–2 | 12.9 | +0.09 | 0.0 | 64% |
| Bella Casaretto | Dartmouth College | 3.20 | 3.24 | 6–8 | 5.9 | +0.05 | 0.0 | 59% |
| Ava Gustafson | Cornell University | 2.45 | 2.48 | 5–9 | 4.9 | +0.04 | 0.0 | 59% |
| Gilda Dondona | Cornell University | 2.68 | 2.71 | 5–9 | 4.9 | +0.04 | 0.0 | 59% |
| Winborne Majette | Cornell University | 3.24 | 3.28 | 5–9 | 4.9 | +0.04 | 0.0 | 59% |
| Fredrikke Foss | College of Charleston | 2.83 | 2.77 | 7–7 | 7.2 | −0.06 | 0.0 | 66% |
| Gabriela Vassel | Tulane University | 2.42 | 2.00 | 5–9 | 6.1 | −0.42 | 0.3 | 84% |
| Ava Anderson | Tulane University | 3.14 | 2.47 | 4–8 | 5.5 | −0.67 | 0.7 | 91% |
| Meredith Broadus | Tufts University | 2.20 | 1.03 | 1–13 | 2.7 | −1.16 | 1.2 | 95% |
Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).
| Team | Rec. | Bulldogs | Cardinal | Bears | Crimson | Engineers | Cougars | Green | Wave | Red | Jumbos | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yale University Bulldogs | 9–0 | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Stanford University Cardinal | 6–3 | L | ✕ | L | L | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Brown University Bears | 7–2 | L | W | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | L | W | |
| Harvard University Crimson | 6–3 | L | W | L | ✕ | W | W | W | L | W | W | |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers | 4–5 | L | L | L | L | ✕ | W | L | W | W | W | |
| College of Charleston Cougars | 4–5 | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | |
| Dartmouth College Big Green | 4–5 | L | L | L | L | W | L | ✕ | W | W | W | |
| Tulane University Green Wave | 3–6 | L | L | L | W | L | L | L | ✕ | W | W | |
| Cornell University Big Red | 2–7 | L | L | W | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ | W | |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 0–9 | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Bulldogs | Cardinal | Bears | Crimson | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yale University Bulldogs | 4–2 | ✕ | L | W | W | |
| Stanford University Cardinal | 6–0 | W | ✕ | W | W | |
| Brown University Bears | 1–5 | L | L | ✕ | L | |
| Harvard University Crimson | 1–5 | L | L | W | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Engineers | Cougars | Green | Wave | Red | Jumbos | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers | 4–1 | ✕ | W | W | L | W | W | |
| College of Charleston Cougars | 3–2 | L | ✕ | W | L | W | W | |
| Dartmouth College Big Green | 2–3 | L | L | ✕ | W | L | W | |
| Tulane University Green Wave | 2–3 | W | W | L | ✕ | L | L | |
| Cornell University Big Red | 3–2 | L | L | W | W | ✕ | W | |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 1–4 | L | L | L | W | L | ✕ |
| # | Winner | Loser | Pos. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Crimson | 1-2-6 | def. | Cougars | 3-4-5 | ||
| 2 | Engineers | 1-2-3 | def. | Big Red | 4-5-6 | ||
| 3 | Bears | 1-2-4 | def. | Big Green | 3-5-6 | ||
| 4 | Cardinal | 1-2-4 | def. | Green Wave | 3-5-6 | ||
| 5 | Bulldogs | 1-2-5 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-6 | ||
| 6 | Cougars | 1-4-5 | def. | Big Red | 2-3-6 | ||
| 7 | Bears | 1-3-6 | def. | Crimson | 2-4-5 | ||
| 8 | Cardinal | 1-2-5 | def. | Engineers | 3-4-6 | ||
| 9 | Big Green | 1-2-5 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-6 | ||
| 10 | Bulldogs | 2-3-4 | def. | Green Wave | 1-5-6 | ||
| 11 | Big Red | 2-3-4 | def. | Bears | 1-5-6 | ||
| 12 | Cardinal | 1-2-4 | def. | Cougars | 3-5-6 | ||
| 13 | Crimson | 1-3-5 | def. | Jumbos | 2-4-6 | ||
| 14 | Engineers | 1-3-5 | def. | Green Wave | 2-4-6 | ||
| 15 | Bulldogs | 1-2-3 | def. | Big Green | 4-5-6 | ||
| 16 | Bears | 2-3-5 | def. | Cardinal | 1-4-6 | ||
| 17 | Big Red | 1-2-5 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-6 | ||
| 18 | Cougars | 1-2-5 | def. | Green Wave | 3-4-6 | ||
| 19 | Crimson | 1-2-4 | def. | Big Green | 3-5-6 | ||
| 20 | Bulldogs | 1-2-6 | def. | Engineers | 3-4-5 | ||
| 21 | Cardinal | 1-2-6 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-5 | ||
| 22 | Bears | 1-2-6 | def. | Green Wave | 3-4-5 | ||
| 23 | Big Green | 1-3-4 | def. | Big Red | 2-5-6 | ||
| 24 | Engineers | 1-4-5 | def. | Cougars | 2-3-6 | ||
| 25 | Bulldogs | 2-3-4 | def. | Crimson | 1-5-6 | ||
| 26 | Green Wave | 1-2-5 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-6 | ||
| 27 | Cardinal | 1-3-4 | def. | Big Green | 2-5-6 | ||
| 28 | Bears | 1-2-3 | def. | Engineers | 4-5-6 | ||
| 29 | Crimson | 1-2-5 | def. | Big Red | 3-4-6 | ||
| 30 | Bulldogs | 2-3-4 | def. | Cougars | 1-5-6 | ||
| 31 | Big Green | 1-4-5 | def. | Green Wave | 2-3-6 | ||
| 32 | Engineers | 1-2-3 | def. | Jumbos | 4-5-6 | ||
| 33 | Crimson | 1-4-5 | def. | Cardinal | 2-3-6 | ||
| 34 | Bears | 1-2-4 | def. | Cougars | 3-5-6 | ||
| 35 | Bulldogs | 1-2-5 | def. | Big Red | 3-4-6 | ||
| 36 | Big Green | 1-4-5 | def. | Engineers | 2-3-6 | ||
| 37 | Green Wave | 1-2-5 | def. | Crimson | 3-4-6 | ||
| 38 | Cougars | 1-2-5 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-6 | ||
| 39 | Cardinal | 1-2-4 | def. | Big Red | 3-5-6 | ||
| 40 | Bulldogs | 1-4-5 | def. | Bears | 2-3-6 | ||
| 41 | Crimson | 2-3-4 | def. | Engineers | 1-5-6 | ||
| 42 | Cougars | 1-2-4 | def. | Big Green | 3-5-6 DNF | ||
| 43 | Green Wave | 1-2-4 | def. | Big Red | 3-5-6 | ||
| 44 | Bears | 1-2-4 | def. | Jumbos | 3-5-6 | ||
| 45 | Bulldogs | 1-2-3 | def. | Cardinal | 4-5-6 | ||
| 46 | Bears | 1-4-5 | def. | Crimson | 2-3-6 | ||
| 47 | Cardinal | 1-2-4 | def. | Bulldogs | 3-5-6 | ||
| 48 | Cardinal | 1-2-6 | def. | Bears | 3-4-5 | ||
| 49 | Bulldogs | 1-2-5 | def. | Crimson | 3-4-6 | ||
| 50 | Cardinal | 1-2-4 | def. | Crimson | 3-5-6 | ||
| 51 | Bulldogs | 1-2-4 | def. | Bears | 3-5-6 | ||
| 67 | Cardinal | 1-2-5 | def. | Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 68 | Bulldogs | 1-2-5 | def. | Crimson | 3-4-6 | ||
| 69 | Cardinal | 1-2-6 | def. | Crimson | 3-4-5 | ||
| 70 | Bulldogs | 1-2-4 | def. | Bears | 3-5-6 | ||
| 71 | Crimson | 2-3-4 | def. | Bears | 1-5-6 | ||
| 72 | Cardinal | 2-3-5 | def. | Bulldogs | 1-4-6 | ||
| 52 | Big Green | 2-3-5 | def. | Green Wave | 1-4-6 | ||
| 53 | Engineers | 1-2-5 | def. | Big Red | 3-4-6 | ||
| 54 | Cougars | 1-2-5 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-6 | ||
| 55 | Engineers | 1-2-5 | def. | Big Green | 3-4-6 | ||
| 56 | Jumbos | 1-3-6 | def. | Green Wave | 2-4-5 | ||
| 57 | Cougars | 1-2-4 | def. | Big Red | 3-5-6 | ||
| 58 | Engineers | 2-3-4 | def. | Jumbos | 1-5-6 | ||
| 59 | Big Red | 2-3-4 | def. | Big Green | 1-5-6 | ||
| 60 | Green Wave | 1-2-6 | def. | Cougars | 3-4-5 | ||
| 61 | Big Red | 2-3-4 | def. | Jumbos | 1-5-6 | ||
| 62 | Green Wave | 1-2-5 | def. | Engineers | 3-4-6 | ||
| 63 | Cougars | 1-3-5 | def. | Big Green | 2-4-6 | ||
| 64 | Big Red | 1-3-4 | def. | Green Wave | 2-5-6 | ||
| 65 | Big Green | 1-2-5 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-6 | ||
| 66 | Engineers | 1-2-6 | def. | Cougars | 3-4-5 | ||
Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.07 means a rating gap counts about 6% more than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.
Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.