| # | School | Team | Rec. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brown University | Bears | 17–3 | |
| 2 | Roger Williams University | Hawks | 15–5 | |
| 3 | Tufts University | Jumbos | 14–6 | |
| 4 | U. S. Coast Guard Academy | Bears | 9–11 | |
| 5 | Yale University | Bulldogs | 9–9 | |
| 6 | Boston College | Eagles | 8–10 | |
| 7 | University of Rhode Island | Rams | 2–16 | |
| 8 | Bentley University | Falcons | 0–14 |
Each side is the sum of its three boats (the skipper's fleet rating times 0.72 plus a team race offset learned from their past matches, plus the crew's offset and a small experience term) plus the school's team race strength and a home-water edge for the host. The win probability is a logistic function of the difference. The forecast was made before the event: the model was refitted on every match sailed before the first day, with fleet ratings as of the week before.
Fitted on the 26,645 team race matches sailed before 2025-03-29, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 65 of 74 matches (88%) with a log-loss of 0.351 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went well for the forecast. Orderliness +0.37 ± 0.24: an orderly event, more orderly than 82% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.
For each side, the performance strength is the value that would have made its record least surprising: the strength at which the model's expected wins over exactly these opponents equal the actual wins, with every opponent fixed at its pre-event strength. For a skipper, the same shift is applied only to their boat in the matches they sailed, with team-mates and opponents fixed; team-mates who sailed every match together therefore get the same number. Surprise is in bits: -log2 of the probability of the record at the pre-event strength minus the same at the performance strength. P(this good or better) treats matches as independent coin flips at the model's pre-event probabilities, so it ignores form within the day; read it as a rough guide.
Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.
| Place | School | Strength | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins | Δ | Surprise (bits) | P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | U. S. Coast Guard Academy | 7.83 | 8.61 | 9–11 | 6.5 | +0.78 | 1.5 | 12% |
| 3 | Tufts University | 9.26 | 9.66 | 14–6 | 12.7 | +0.40 | 0.4 | 33% |
| 1 | Brown University | 10.07 | 10.45 | 17–3 | 16.0 | +0.37 | 0.2 | 41% |
| 2 | Roger Williams University | 9.60 | 9.87 | 15–5 | 14.2 | +0.27 | 0.2 | 43% |
| 6 | Boston College | 8.07 | 7.98 | 8–10 | 8.3 | −0.08 | 0.0 | 66% |
| 5 | Yale University | 8.78 | 8.00 | 9–9 | 11.5 | −0.78 | 1.4 | 95% |
| 7 | University of Rhode Island | 7.11 | 4.33 | 2–16 | 4.9 | −2.78 | 4.1 | >99% |
| 8 | Bentley University | 2.57 | -0.43 | 0–14 | 0.0 | ≤−3.00 | 0.1 | >99% |
| Skipper | School | Value | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins | Δ | Surprise (bits) | P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Mcgonagle | U. S. Coast Guard Academy | 2.52 | 3.30 | 9–11 | 6.5 | +0.78 | 1.5 | 12% |
| Luke Zylinski | U. S. Coast Guard Academy | 2.87 | 3.65 | 9–11 | 6.5 | +0.78 | 1.5 | 12% |
| Adrien Bellanger | Tufts University | 2.63 | 3.03 | 14–6 | 12.7 | +0.40 | 0.4 | 33% |
| Drew Mastovsky | Roger Williams University | 3.31 | 3.57 | 15–5 | 14.2 | +0.27 | 0.2 | 43% |
| James O’Gwen | Boston College | 2.60 | 2.52 | 8–10 | 8.3 | −0.08 | 0.0 | 66% |
| Mathias Reimer | Yale University | 2.65 | 1.87 | 9–9 | 11.5 | −0.78 | 1.4 | 95% |
| Audrey Foley | Yale University | 2.64 | 1.86 | 9–9 | 11.5 | −0.78 | 1.4 | 95% |
| Adam Strobridge | University of Rhode Island | 2.27 | -0.51 | 2–16 | 4.9 | −2.78 | 4.1 | >99% |
| Andrew Blagden | Bentley University | 0.28 | -2.71 | 0–14 | 0.0 | ≤−3.00 | 0.1 | >99% |
| Isabel Walchli | Bentley University | 1.40 | -1.60 | 0–14 | 0.0 | ≤−3.00 | 0.1 | >99% |
| Wilfred Hynes | Bentley University | 0.41 | -2.59 | 0–14 | 0.0 | ≤−3.00 | 0.1 | >99% |
Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).
| Team | Rec. | Bears | Hawks | Jumbos | Bears | Bulldogs | Eagles | Rams | Falcons | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brown University Bears | 5–2 | ✕ | W | L | W | W | L | W | W | |
| Roger Williams University Hawks | 6–1 | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 6–1 | W | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | |
| U. S. Coast Guard Academy Bears | 4–3 | L | L | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | |
| Yale University Bulldogs | 3–4 | L | L | L | L | ✕ | W | W | W | |
| Boston College Eagles | 3–4 | W | L | L | L | L | ✕ | W | W | |
| University of Rhode Island Rams | 1–6 | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ | W | |
| Bentley University Falcons | 0–7 | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Bears | Hawks | Jumbos | Bears | Bulldogs | Eagles | Rams | Falcons | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brown University Bears | 7–0 | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Roger Williams University Hawks | 6–1 | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 5–2 | L | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | |
| U. S. Coast Guard Academy Bears | 4–3 | L | L | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | |
| Yale University Bulldogs | 3–4 | L | L | L | L | ✕ | W | W | W | |
| Boston College Eagles | 2–5 | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ | W | W | |
| University of Rhode Island Rams | 1–6 | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ | W | |
| Bentley University Falcons | 0–7 | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Bears | Hawks | Jumbos | Bears | Bulldogs | Eagles | Rams | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brown University Bears | 2–1 | ✕ | W | W | L | – | – | – | |
| Roger Williams University Hawks | 1–2 | L | ✕ | L | W | – | – | – | |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 2–1 | L | W | ✕ | W | – | – | – | |
| U. S. Coast Guard Academy Bears | 1–2 | W | L | L | ✕ | – | – | – | |
| Yale University Bulldogs | 3–1 | – | – | – | – | ✕ | L | W | |
| Boston College Eagles | 3–1 | – | – | – | – | W | ✕ | W | |
| University of Rhode Island Rams | 0–4 | – | – | – | – | L | L | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Bears | Hawks | Jumbos | Bears | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brown University Bears | 3–0 | ✕ | W | W | W | |
| Roger Williams University Hawks | 2–1 | L | ✕ | W | W | |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 1–2 | L | L | ✕ | W | |
| U. S. Coast Guard Academy Bears | 0–3 | L | L | L | ✕ |
| # | Winner | Loser | Pos. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hawks | 1-3-5 | def. | Bears | 2-4-6 | ||
| 2 | Jumbos | 1-4-5 | def. | Bears | 2-3-6 | ||
| 3 | Rams | 1-2-5 | def. | Falcons | 3-4-6 | ||
| 7 | Bulldogs | 1-2-5 | def. | Eagles | 3-4-6 | ||
| 8 | Bears | 1-3-4 | def. | Bears | 2-5-6 | ||
| 9 | Hawks | 1-2-3 | def. | Falcons | 4-5-6 | ||
| 13 | Jumbos | 1-2-6 | def. | Bulldogs | 3-4-5 | ||
| 14 | Eagles | 1-2-4 | def. | Rams | 3-5-6 | ||
| 15 | Bears | 1-2-3 | def. | Falcons | 4-5-6 | ||
| 19 | Bears | 1-2-4 | def. | Bulldogs | 3-5-6 | ||
| 20 | Hawks | 1-2-5 | def. | Rams | 3-4-6 | ||
| 21 | Jumbos | 1-3-5 | def. | Eagles | 2-4-6 | ||
| 25 | Bulldogs | 1-2-3 | def. | Falcons | 4-5-6 | ||
| 26 | Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Rams | 3-4-6 | ||
| 27 | Jumbos | 1-3-4 | def. | Bears | 2-5-6 | ||
| 31 | Hawks | 1-2-5 | def. | Eagles | 3-4-6 | ||
| 32 | Bulldogs | 2-3-4 | def. | Rams | 1-5-6 | ||
| 33 | Jumbos | 1-2-3 | def. | Falcons | 4-5-6 | ||
| 37 | Bears | 1-2-6 | def. | Hawks | 3-4-5 | ||
| 38 | Bears | 1-3-5 | def. | Eagles | 2-4-6 | ||
| 39 | Jumbos | 1-2-3 | def. | Rams | 4-5-6 | ||
| 43 | Hawks | 1-2-6 | def. | Bulldogs | 3-4-5 | ||
| 44 | Bears | 1-2-3 | def. | Falcons | 4-5-6 | ||
| 45 | Eagles | 1-3-5 | def. | Bears | 2-4-6 | ||
| 49 | Hawks | 2-3-5 | def. | Jumbos | 1-4-6 | ||
| 50 | Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Rams | 3-4-6 | ||
| 51 | Bears | 1-2-4 | def. | Bulldogs | 3-5-6 | ||
| 55 | Eagles | 1-2-3 | def. | Falcons | 4-5-6 | ||
| 4 | Hawks | 1-2-5 | def. | Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 5 | Bears | 1-3-6 | def. | Jumbos | 2-4-5 | ||
| 6 | Rams | 1-2-4 | def. | Falcons | 3-5-6 | ||
| 10 | Bulldogs | 2-3-4 | def. | Eagles | 1-5-6 | ||
| 11 | Bears | 1-2-4 | def. | Bears | 3-5-6 | ||
| 12 | Hawks | 1-2-3 | def. | Falcons | 4-5-6 | ||
| 16 | Jumbos | 1-2-6 | def. | Bulldogs | 3-4-5 | ||
| 17 | Eagles | 1-4-5 | def. | Rams | 2-3-6 | ||
| 18 | Bears | 1-2-3 | def. | Falcons | 4-5-6 | ||
| 22 | Bears | 1-3-5 | def. | Bulldogs | 2-4-6 | ||
| 23 | Hawks | 1-2-3 | def. | Rams | 4-5-6 | ||
| 24 | Jumbos | 1-3-4 | def. | Eagles | 2-5-6 | ||
| 28 | Bulldogs | 1-2-3 | def. | Falcons | 4-5-6 | ||
| 29 | Bears | 1-3-4 | def. | Rams | 2-5-6 | ||
| 30 | Jumbos | 1-2-4 | def. | Bears | 3-5-6 | ||
| 34 | Hawks | 1-3-5 | def. | Eagles | 2-4-6 | ||
| 35 | Bulldogs | 1-2-4 | def. | Rams | 3-5-6 | ||
| 36 | Jumbos | 1-2-3 | def. | Falcons | 4-5-6 | ||
| 40 | Bears | 1-2-6 | def. | Hawks | 3-4-5 | ||
| 41 | Bears | 1-2-6 | def. | Eagles | 3-4-5 | ||
| 42 | Jumbos | 1-2-4 | def. | Rams | 3-5-6 | ||
| 46 | Hawks | 1-2-6 | def. | Bulldogs | 3-4-5 | ||
| 47 | Bears | 1-2-3 | def. | Falcons | 4-5-6 | ||
| 48 | Bears | 1-3-6 | def. | Eagles | 2-4-5 | ||
| 52 | Hawks | 1-3-5 | def. | Jumbos | 2-4-6 | ||
| 53 | Bears | 1-3-6 | def. | Rams | 2-4-5 | ||
| 54 | Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Bulldogs | 3-4-6 | ||
| 56 | Eagles | 1-2-3 | def. | Falcons | 4-5-6 | ||
| 57 | Jumbos | 1-2-5 | def. | Hawks | 3-4-6 | ||
| 58 | Bears | 1-4-5 | def. | Bears | 2-3-6 | ||
| 61 | Hawks | 1-2-6 | def. | Bears | 3-4-5 | ||
| 62 | Bears | 1-2-6 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-5 | ||
| 65 | Jumbos | 1-2-5 | def. | Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 66 | Bears | 1-2-3 | def. | Hawks | 4-5-6 | ||
| 69 | Bulldogs | 1-2-5 | def. | Eagles | 3-4-6 | ||
| 70 | Eagles | 1-2-3 | def. | Bulldogs | 4-5-6 | ||
| 71 | Bulldogs | 2-3-4 | def. | Rams | 1-5-6 | ||
| 72 | Bulldogs | 2-3-5 | def. | Rams | 1-4-6 | ||
| 73 | Eagles | 1-3-5 | def. | Rams | 2-4-6 | ||
| 74 | Eagles | 1-2-6 | def. | Rams | 3-4-5 | ||
| 59 | Hawks | 1-2-6 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-5 | ||
| 60 | Bears | 1-2-3 | def. | Bears | 4-5-6 | ||
| 63 | Hawks | 1-3-6 | def. | Bears | 2-4-5 | ||
| 64 | Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-6 | ||
| 67 | Jumbos | 1-2-4 | def. | Bears | 3-5-6 | ||
| 68 | Bears | 1-2-3 | def. | Hawks | 4-5-6 | ||
Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.04 means a rating gap counts about 3% less than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.
Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.