| # | School | Team | A | B | TOT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  |
Tufts University | Jumbos | 14 | 20 | 34 |
| 2 |  |
Boston College | Eagles | 23 | 13 | 36 |
| 3 |  |
Northeastern University | Huskies | 28 | 9 | 37 |
| 4 |  |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Engineers 1 | 16 | 26 | 42 |
| 5 |  |
Connecticut College | Camels | 12 | 30 | 42 |
| 6 |  |
Bowdoin College | Polar Bears | 28 | 28 | 56 |
| 7 | |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Engineers 2 | 32 | 27 | 59 |
| 8 |  |
Harvard University | Crimson | 35 | 31 | 66 |
| 9 |  |
Wentworth Institute of Technology | Leopards | 41 | 41 | 82 |
| 10 |  |
Emmanuel College | Saints | 54 | 50 | 104 |
| 11 |  |
University of New Hampshire | Wildcats | 50 | 59 | 109 |
| Team | 1A | 2A | 3A | 4A | 5A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boston College Eagles | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| Bowdoin College Polar Bears | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| Connecticut College Camels | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 8 |
| Emmanuel College Saints | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 9 |
| Harvard University Crimson | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 10 |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 1 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 11 |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 2 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 15 |
| University of New Hampshire Wildcats | 11 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Northeastern University Huskies | 9 | 9 | 11 | 11 | 1 |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 10 | 10 | 15 | 15 | 2 |
| Wentworth Institute of Technology Leopards | 15 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Team | 1B | 2B | 3B | 4B | 5B | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boston College Eagles | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| Bowdoin College Polar Bears | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 8 |
| Connecticut College Camels | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 9 |
| Emmanuel College Saints | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 10 |
| Harvard University Crimson | 6 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 11 |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 1 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 15 |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers 2 | 9 | 9 | 11 | 11 | 1 |
| University of New Hampshire Wildcats | 15 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Northeastern University Huskies | 10 | 10 | 15 | 15 | 2 |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 11 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Wentworth Institute of Technology Leopards | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
Orderliness is how tightly the finishing order followed the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0). Positive is the favourites’ day: the ratings carried more weight than usual and the top seeds finished where expected. Negative is the underdogs’ day: the fleet compressed and the favourites came back to the pack. A value of ±0.00 means a rating gap counts about 1% more than on a typical day.
The breeze reading is the chart’s value at this regatta’s wind direction and speed (the star): this venue’s pattern of which directions bring order and which bring upsets, with breeze generally orderly and light air surprising. The fleet adjustment comes from the entry list: the stronger and more experienced the fleet, the more surprising the racing. How this is estimated · compare venues.
Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.
