| # | School | Team | Rec. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tufts University | Jumbalaya | 17–4 | |
| 2 | Brown University | Bears | 17–4 | |
| 3 | Tufts University | Jumbos | 15–6 | |
| 4 | Dartmouth College | Big Green | 13–8 | |
| 5 | Roger Williams University | Hawks | 8–13 | |
| 6 | Yale University | Bulldogs | 7–14 | |
| 7 | Harvard University | Crimson | 4–17 | |
| 8 | University of Vermont | Catamounts | 3–18 |
Each side is the sum of its three boats (the skipper's fleet rating times 0.72 plus a team race offset learned from their past matches, plus the crew's offset and a small experience term) plus the school's team race strength and a home-water edge for the host. The win probability is a logistic function of the difference. The forecast was made before the event: the model was refitted on every match sailed before the first day, with fleet ratings as of the week before.
Fitted on the 988 team race matches sailed before 2013-03-30, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 62 of 84 matches (74%) with a log-loss of 0.525 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went about as expected for the forecast. vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.
For each side, the performance strength is the value that would have made its record least surprising: the strength at which the model's expected wins over exactly these opponents equal the actual wins, with every opponent fixed at its pre-event strength. For a skipper, the same shift is applied only to their boat in the matches they sailed, with team-mates and opponents fixed; team-mates who sailed every match together therefore get the same number. Surprise is in bits: -log2 of the probability of the record at the pre-event strength minus the same at the performance strength. P(this good or better) treats matches as independent coin flips at the model's pre-event probabilities, so it ignores form within the day; read it as a rough guide.
Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.
| Place | School | Strength | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins | Δ | Surprise (bits) | P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Roger Williams University Hawks | 6.60 | 8.41 | 8–13 | 2.7 | +1.81 | 7.5 | <1% |
| 4 | Dartmouth College Big Green | 8.68 | 9.50 | 13–8 | 10.2 | +0.83 | 1.7 | 10% |
| 2 | Brown University Bears | 10.33 | 10.41 | 17–4 | 16.8 | +0.08 | 0.0 | 58% |
| 1 | Tufts University Jumbalaya | 10.36 | 10.41 | 17–4 | 16.9 | +0.04 | 0.0 | 61% |
| 3 | Tufts University Jumbos | 9.84 | 9.84 | 15–6 | 15.0 | −0.01 | 0.0 | 62% |
| 7 | Harvard University Crimson | 7.16 | 6.98 | 4–17 | 4.5 | −0.18 | 0.1 | 72% |
| 8 | University of Vermont Catamounts | 7.61 | 6.43 | 3–18 | 6.0 | −1.18 | 2.4 | 98% |
| 6 | Yale University Bulldogs | 9.13 | 7.63 | 7–14 | 12.0 | −1.50 | 5.3 | >99% |
| Skipper | School | Value | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins | Δ | Surprise (bits) | P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew Paige | Roger Williams University | 2.06 | 3.86 | 8–13 | 2.7 | +1.81 | 7.5 | <1% |
| Cole Rice | Roger Williams University | 1.96 | 3.76 | 8–13 | 2.7 | +1.81 | 7.5 | <1% |
| Ian Hollerbach | Roger Williams University | 2.12 | 3.92 | 8–13 | 2.7 | +1.81 | 7.5 | <1% |
| John Renehan | Dartmouth College | 2.65 | 3.47 | 13–8 | 10.2 | +0.83 | 1.7 | 10% |
| Christopher Price | Dartmouth College | 3.05 | 3.88 | 13–8 | 10.2 | +0.83 | 1.7 | 10% |
| Evan Read | Dartmouth College | 2.51 | 3.34 | 13–8 | 10.2 | +0.83 | 1.7 | 10% |
| Drew Shea | Brown University | 2.74 | 2.82 | 17–4 | 16.8 | +0.08 | 0.0 | 58% |
| Lucas Adams | Brown University | 3.47 | 3.55 | 17–4 | 16.8 | +0.08 | 0.0 | 58% |
| Duncan Swain | Tufts University | 3.12 | 3.17 | 17–4 | 16.9 | +0.04 | 0.0 | 61% |
| Alejandro Ruiz-Ramon | Tufts University | 3.56 | 3.60 | 17–4 | 16.9 | +0.04 | 0.0 | 61% |
| Dan Nickerson | Tufts University | 2.98 | 3.02 | 17–4 | 16.9 | +0.04 | 0.0 | 61% |
| Charles Proctor | Tufts University | 2.52 | 2.51 | 15–6 | 15.0 | −0.01 | 0.0 | 62% |
| Willem Sandberg | Tufts University | 3.27 | 3.26 | 15–6 | 15.0 | −0.01 | 0.0 | 62% |
| Ben Weigel | Tufts University | 2.95 | 2.94 | 15–6 | 15.0 | −0.01 | 0.0 | 62% |
| Marek Zaleski | Harvard University | 3.35 | 3.17 | 4–17 | 4.5 | −0.18 | 0.1 | 72% |
| Ben Lamont | Harvard University | 2.09 | 1.90 | 4–17 | 4.5 | −0.18 | 0.1 | 72% |
| Ames Lyman | Harvard University | 1.66 | 1.47 | 4–17 | 4.5 | −0.18 | 0.1 | 72% |
| Nate Jermain | University of Vermont | 2.84 | 1.66 | 3–18 | 6.0 | −1.18 | 2.4 | 98% |
| Adam Ceely | University of Vermont | 2.36 | 1.18 | 3–18 | 6.0 | −1.18 | 2.4 | 98% |
| Megan Yeigh | University of Vermont | 2.73 | 1.55 | 3–18 | 6.0 | −1.18 | 2.4 | 98% |
| Max Nickbarg | Yale University | 3.21 | 1.71 | 7–14 | 12.0 | −1.50 | 5.3 | >99% |
| Emily Billing | Yale University | 3.34 | 1.84 | 7–14 | 12.0 | −1.50 | 5.3 | >99% |
| Marly Isler | Yale University | 2.48 | 0.97 | 7–14 | 12.0 | −1.50 | 5.3 | >99% |
Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).
| Team | Rec. | Jumbalaya | Bears | Jumbos | Green | Hawks | Bulldogs | Crimson | Catamounts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tufts University Jumbalaya | 11–3 | ✕ | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Brown University Bears | 6–1 | W | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 11–3 | ✕ | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Dartmouth College Big Green | 3–4 | L | L | L | ✕ | L | W | W | W | |
| Roger Williams University Hawks | 3–4 | L | L | L | W | ✕ | L | W | W | |
| Yale University Bulldogs | 3–4 | L | L | L | L | W | ✕ | W | L | |
| Harvard University Crimson | 0–7 | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ | L | |
| University of Vermont Catamounts | 2–5 | L | L | L | L | L | W | W | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Jumbalaya | Bears | Jumbos | Green | Hawks | Bulldogs | Crimson | Catamounts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tufts University Jumbalaya | 12–2 | ✕ | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Brown University Bears | 5–2 | W | ✕ | W | L | W | W | W | W | |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 12–2 | ✕ | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Dartmouth College Big Green | 5–2 | L | W | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | |
| Roger Williams University Hawks | 3–4 | L | L | L | L | ✕ | W | W | W | |
| Yale University Bulldogs | 1–6 | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ | W | L | |
| Harvard University Crimson | 1–6 | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ | W | |
| University of Vermont Catamounts | 1–6 | L | L | L | L | L | W | L | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Jumbalaya | Bears | Jumbos | Green | Hawks | Bulldogs | Crimson | Catamounts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tufts University Jumbalaya | 9–5 | ✕ | L | ✕ | L | L | W | W | W | |
| Brown University Bears | 6–1 | W | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 9–5 | ✕ | L | ✕ | L | L | W | W | W | |
| Dartmouth College Big Green | 5–2 | W | L | W | ✕ | W | L | W | W | |
| Roger Williams University Hawks | 2–5 | W | L | W | L | ✕ | L | L | W | |
| Yale University Bulldogs | 3–4 | L | L | L | W | W | ✕ | L | W | |
| Harvard University Crimson | 3–4 | L | L | L | L | W | W | ✕ | W | |
| University of Vermont Catamounts | 0–7 | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ |
| # | Winner | Loser | Pos. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jumbos | 1-2-5 | def. | Crimson | 3-4-6 | ||
| 2 | Bears | 1-2-4 | def. | Catamounts | 3-5-6 | ||
| 3 | Bulldogs | 1-2-3 | def. | Hawks | 4-5-6 | ||
| 4 | Catamounts | 1-4-5 | def. | Bulldogs | 2-3-6 | ||
| 5 | Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Hawks | 3-4-6 | ||
| 6 | Jumbalaya | 1-2-4 | def. | Big Green | 3-5-6 | ||
| 7 | Jumbalaya | 1-3-5 | def. | Bears | 2-4-6 | ||
| 8 | Jumbos | 1-4-5 | def. | Hawks | 2-3-6 | ||
| 9 | Big Green | 1-2-4 | def. | Crimson | 3-5-6 | ||
| 10 | Jumbos | 1-2-3 | def. | Big Green | 4-5-6 | ||
| 11 | Hawks | 1-2-6 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-5 | ||
| 12 | Bulldogs | 1-2-3 | def. | Crimson | 4-5-6 | ||
| 13 | Hawks | 1-2-3 | def. | Crimson | 4-5-6 | ||
| 14 | Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Bulldogs | 3-4-6 | ||
| 15 | Jumbalaya | 1-4-5 | def. | Catamounts | 2-3-6 | ||
| 16 | Bulldogs | 2-3-4 | def. | Jumbalaya | 1-5-6 | ||
| 17 | Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-6 | ||
| 18 | Big Green | 1-2-5 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-6 | ||
| 19 | Jumbos | 2-3-4 | def. | Catamounts | 1-5-6 | ||
| 20 | Hawks | 1-2-4 | def. | Big Green | 3-5-6 | ||
| 21 | Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Crimson | 3-4-6 | ||
| 22 | Bears | 1-2-4 | def. | Big Green | 3-5-6 | ||
| 23 | Jumbalaya | 1-2-5 | def. | Crimson | 3-4-6 | ||
| 24 | Jumbos | 1-2-4 | def. | Bulldogs | 3-5-6 | ||
| 25 | Jumbalaya | 1-3-6 | def. | Jumbos | 2-4-5 | ||
| 26 | Big Green | 2-3-4 | def. | Bulldogs | 1-5-6 | ||
| 27 | Catamounts | 1-2-4 | def. | Crimson | 3-5-6 | ||
| 28 | Jumbalaya | 1-3-6 | def. | Hawks | 2-4-5 | ||
| 29 | Jumbos | 1-2-4 | def. | Crimson | 3-5-6 | ||
| 30 | Bears | 2-3-4 | def. | Catamounts | 1-5-6 | ||
| 31 | Hawks | 1-2-6 | def. | Bulldogs | 3-4-5 | ||
| 32 | Catamounts | 1-3-5 | def. | Bulldogs | 2-4-6 | ||
| 33 | Bears | 1-2-3 | def. | Hawks | 4-5-6 | ||
| 34 | Jumbalaya | 1-3-4 | def. | Big Green | 2-5-6 | ||
| 35 | Jumbalaya | 1-3-5 | def. | Bears | 2-4-6 | ||
| 36 | Jumbos | 1-2-5 | def. | Hawks | 3-4-6 | ||
| 37 | Big Green | 1-2-6 | def. | Crimson | 3-4-5 | ||
| 38 | Jumbos | 1-2-3 | def. | Big Green | 4-5-6 | ||
| 39 | Hawks | 3-4-6 | def. | Catamounts | 1-2-5 DSQ | ||
| 40 | Bulldogs | 1-2-5 | def. | Crimson | 3-4-6 | ||
| 41 | Hawks | 2-3-5 | def. | Crimson | 1-4-6 | ||
| 42 | Bears | 2-3-4 | def. | Bulldogs | 1-5-6 | ||
| 43 | Jumbalaya | 1-2-3 | def. | Catamounts | 4-5-6 | ||
| 44 | Jumbalaya | 1-2-5 | def. | Bulldogs | 3-4-6 | ||
| 45 | Bears | 1-2-6 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-5 | ||
| 46 | Big Green | 1-2-5 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-6 | ||
| 47 | Jumbos | 2-3-5 | def. | Catamounts | 1-4-6 | ||
| 48 | Big Green | 1-2-5 | def. | Hawks | 3-4-6 | ||
| 49 | Bears | 1-2-3 | def. | Crimson | 4-5-6 | ||
| 50 | Big Green | 1-2-4 | def. | Bears | 3-5-6 | ||
| 51 | Jumbalaya | 1-2-3 | def. | Crimson | 4-5-6 | ||
| 52 | Jumbos | 1-2-4 | def. | Bulldogs | 3-5-6 | ||
| 53 | Jumbos | 1-2-6 | def. | Jumbalaya | 3-4-5 | ||
| 54 | Big Green | 1-2-5 | def. | Bulldogs | 3-4-6 | ||
| 55 | Crimson | 1-2-6 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-5 | ||
| 56 | Jumbalaya | 1-2-5 | def. | Hawks | 3-4-6 | ||
| 57 | Jumbos | 1-2-5 | def. | Crimson | 3-4-6 | ||
| 58 | Bears | 1-2-6 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-5 | ||
| 59 | Bulldogs | 1-2-3 | def. | Hawks | 4-5-6 | ||
| 60 | Bulldogs | 1-3-5 | def. | Catamounts | 2-4-6 | ||
| 61 | Bears | 1-2-6 | def. | Hawks | 3-4-5 | ||
| 62 | Big Green | 1-5-6 | def. | Jumbalaya | 2-3-4 DSQ | ||
| 63 | Jumbalaya | 1-2-6 | def. | Bears | 3-4-5 | ||
| 64 | Jumbos | 1-2-5 | def. | Hawks | 3-4-6 | ||
| 65 | Big Green | 1-2-5 | def. | Crimson | 3-4-6 | ||
| 66 | Big Green | 2-3-4 | def. | Jumbos | 1-5-6 | ||
| 67 | Hawks | 1-4-5 | def. | Catamounts | 2-3-6 | ||
| 68 | Crimson | 1-3-5 | def. | Bulldogs | 2-4-6 | ||
| 69 | Crimson | 1-3-6 | def. | Hawks | 2-4-5 | ||
| 70 | Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Bulldogs | 3-4-6 | ||
| 71 | Jumbalaya | 1-2-5 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-6 | ||
| 72 | Jumbalaya | 2-3-5 | def. | Bulldogs | 1-4-6 | ||
| 73 | Bears | 1-3-5 | def. | Jumbos | 2-4-6 | ||
| 74 | Big Green | 2-3-4 | def. | Catamounts | 1-5-6 | ||
| 75 | Jumbos | 1-2-5 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-6 | ||
| 76 | Big Green | 1-2-4 | def. | Hawks | 3-5-6 | ||
| 77 | Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Crimson | 3-4-6 | ||
| 78 | Bears | 1-2-4 | def. | Big Green | 3-5-6 | ||
| 79 | Jumbalaya | 1-3-4 | def. | Crimson | 2-5-6 | ||
| 80 | Jumbos | 3-4-5 | def. | Bulldogs | 1-2-6 DSQ | ||
| 81 | Jumbalaya | 1-3-6 | def. | Jumbos | 2-4-5 | ||
| 82 | Bulldogs | 1-2-4 | def. | Big Green | 3-5-6 | ||
| 83 | Crimson | 1-2-6 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-5 | ||
| 84 | Hawks | 1-2-6 | def. | Jumbalaya | 3-4-5 | ||
Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.05 means a rating gap counts about 4% less than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.
Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.