| # | School | Team | Rec. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Roger Williams University | Hawks | 13–0 | |
| 2 | University of Rhode Island | Rams | 10–3 | |
| 3 | Tufts University | Jumbos | 10–3 | |
| 4 | Dartmouth College | Big Green | 8–5 | |
| 5 | University of Vermont | Catamounts | 4–9 | |
| 6 | Bowdoin College | Polar Bears | 3–8 | |
| 7 | Boston University | Terriers 1 | 2–10 | |
| 8 | Boston University | Terriers 2 | 0–12 |
Each side is the sum of its three boats (the skipper's fleet rating times 0.72 plus a team race offset learned from their past matches, plus the crew's offset and a small experience term) plus the school's team race strength and a home-water edge for the host. The win probability is a logistic function of the difference. The forecast was made before the event: the model was refitted on every match sailed before the first day, with fleet ratings as of the week before.
Fitted on the 28,305 team race matches sailed before 2026-02-28, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 46 of 52 matches (88%) with a log-loss of 0.216 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went well for the forecast. Orderliness +0.34 ± 0.24: an orderly event, more orderly than 79% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.
For each side, the performance strength is the value that would have made its record least surprising: the strength at which the model's expected wins over exactly these opponents equal the actual wins, with every opponent fixed at its pre-event strength. For a skipper, the same shift is applied only to their boat in the matches they sailed, with team-mates and opponents fixed; team-mates who sailed every match together therefore get the same number. Surprise is in bits: -log2 of the probability of the record at the pre-event strength minus the same at the performance strength. P(this good or better) treats matches as independent coin flips at the model's pre-event probabilities, so it ignores form within the day; read it as a rough guide.
Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.
| Place | School | Strength | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins | Δ | Surprise (bits) | P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Roger Williams University Hawks | 10.73 | 13.73 | 14–0 | 13.5 | ≥+3.00 | 0.7 | 59% |
| 2 | University of Rhode Island Rams | 8.02 | 9.10 | 11–3 | 9.4 | +1.09 | 1.2 | 20% |
| 5 | University of Vermont Catamounts | 5.39 | 5.91 | 4–8 | 3.3 | +0.52 | 0.3 | 41% |
| 4 | Dartmouth College Big Green | 7.45 | 7.95 | 7–5 | 6.2 | +0.51 | 0.3 | 41% |
| 8 | Boston University Terriers 2 | 4.39 | 4.28 | 1–13 | 1.1 | −0.11 | 0.0 | 70% |
| 6 | Bowdoin College Polar Bears | 6.22 | 5.59 | 3–9 | 3.9 | −0.62 | 0.4 | 88% |
| 3 | Tufts University Jumbos | 8.93 | 8.25 | 10–4 | 10.9 | −0.68 | 0.5 | 90% |
| 7 | Boston University Terriers 1 | 6.02 | 4.48 | 2–10 | 3.7 | −1.54 | 1.8 | 98% |
Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).
| Team | Rec. | Hawks | Rams | Jumbos | Green | Catamounts | Bears | 1 | 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Williams University Hawks | 7–0 | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| University of Rhode Island Rams | 6–1 | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 5–2 | L | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Dartmouth College Big Green | 4–3 | L | L | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | |
| University of Vermont Catamounts | 2–5 | L | L | L | L | ✕ | L | W | W | |
| Bowdoin College Polar Bears | 2–5 | L | L | L | L | W | ✕ | L | L | |
| Boston University Terriers 1 | 2–12 | L | L | L | L | L | W | ✕ | ✕ | |
| Boston University Terriers 2 | 2–12 | L | L | L | L | L | W | ✕ | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Hawks | Rams | Jumbos | Green | Catamounts | Bears | 1 | 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Williams University Hawks | 7–0 | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| University of Rhode Island Rams | 5–2 | L | ✕ | W | L | W | W | W | W | |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 5–2 | L | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Dartmouth College Big Green | 4–3 | L | W | L | ✕ | L | W | W | W | |
| University of Vermont Catamounts | 3–4 | L | L | L | W | ✕ | L | W | W | |
| Bowdoin College Polar Bears | 1–6 | L | L | L | L | W | ✕ | L | L | |
| Boston University Terriers 1 | 3–11 | L | L | L | L | L | W | ✕ | ✕ | |
| Boston University Terriers 2 | 3–11 | L | L | L | L | L | W | ✕ | ✕ |
| # | Winner | Loser | Pos. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jumbos | 1-2-5 | def. | Big Green | 3-4-6 | ||
| 2 | Rams | 1-2-5 | def. | Terriers 2 | 3-4-6 | ||
| 3 | Catamounts | 1-3-6 | def. | Terriers 1 | 2-4-5 | ||
| 4 | Hawks | 1-2-3 | def. | Polar Bears | 4-5-6 | ||
| 5 | Big Green | 1-2-4 | def. | Terriers 2 | 3-5-6 | ||
| 6 | Jumbos | 1-2-3 | def. | Terriers 1 | 4-5-6 | ||
| 7 | Hawks | 1-2-5 | def. | Rams | 3-4-6 | ||
| 8 | Polar Bears | 1-2-4 | def. | Catamounts | 3-5-6 | ||
| 9 | Terriers 1 | 1-2-3 | def. | Terriers 2 | 4-5-6 | ||
| 10 | Hawks | 1-2-5 | def. | Big Green | 3-4-6 | ||
| 11 | Jumbos | 1-2-4 | def. | Catamounts | 3-5-6 | ||
| 12 | Rams | 1-2-5 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 13 | Hawks | 1-2-3 | def. | Terriers 1 | 4-5-6 | ||
| 14 | Catamounts | 1-3-4 | def. | Terriers 2 | 2-5-6 | ||
| 15 | Rams | 1-3-5 | def. | Big Green | 2-4-6 | ||
| 16 | Jumbos | 1-2-4 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-5-6 | ||
| 17 | Hawks | 1-2-3 | def. | Catamounts | 4-5-6 | ||
| 18 | Rams | 1-2-5 | def. | Terriers 1 | 3-4-6 | ||
| 19 | Jumbos | 2-3-4 | def. | Terriers 2 | 1-5-6 | ||
| 20 | Big Green | 2-3-5 | def. | Polar Bears | 1-4-6 | ||
| 21 | Rams | 1-2-4 | def. | Catamounts | 3-5-6 | ||
| 22 | Hawks | 1-2-6 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-5 | ||
| 23 | Big Green | 1-2-3 | def. | Terriers 1 | 4-5-6 | ||
| 24 | Polar Bears | 2-3-4 | def. | Terriers 2 | 1-5-6 | ||
| 25 | Rams | 1-2-5 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-6 | ||
| 26 | Big Green | 1-2-5 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-6 | ||
| 27 | Hawks | 1-2-4 | def. | Terriers 2 | 3-5-6 | ||
| 28 | Terriers 1 | def. | Polar Bears | ||||
| 29 | Jumbos | 1-2-3 | def. | Big Green | 4-5-6 | ||
| 30 | Rams | 1-2-5 | def. | Terriers 2 | 3-4-6 | ||
| 31 | Catamounts | 1-3-6 | def. | Terriers 1 | 2-4-5 | ||
| 32 | Hawks | 1-2-5 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 33 | Big Green | 1-2-4 | def. | Terriers 2 | 3-5-6 | ||
| 34 | Jumbos | 1-2-3 | def. | Terriers 1 | 4-5-6 | ||
| 35 | Hawks | 1-2-5 | def. | Rams | 3-4-6 | ||
| 36 | Polar Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-6 | ||
| 37 | Terriers 1 | 1-2-6 | def. | Terriers 2 | 3-4-5 | ||
| 38 | Hawks | 1-2-5 | def. | Big Green | 3-4-6 | ||
| 39 | Jumbos | 1-2-6 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-5 | ||
| 40 | Rams | 1-2-4 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-5-6 | ||
| 41 | Hawks | 1-2-5 | def. | Terriers 1 | 3-4-6 | ||
| 42 | Catamounts | 1-2-3 | def. | Terriers 2 | 4-5-6 | ||
| 43 | Big Green | 1-2-6 | def. | Rams | 3-4-5 | ||
| 44 | Jumbos | 1-2-5 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 45 | Hawks | 1-2-3 | def. | Catamounts | 4-5-6 | ||
| 46 | Rams | 1-2-5 | def. | Terriers 1 | 3-4-6 | ||
| 47 | Jumbos | 1-2-6 | def. | Terriers 2 | 3-4-5 | ||
| 48 | Big Green | 1-2-3 | def. | Polar Bears | 4-5-6 | ||
| 49 | Rams | 1-2-4 | def. | Catamounts | 3-5-6 | ||
| 50 | Hawks | 2-3-4 | def. | Jumbos | 1-5-6 | ||
| 51 | Big Green | 2-3-4 | def. | Terriers 1 | 1-5-6 | ||
| 52 | Terriers 2 | def. | Polar Bears | ||||
| 53 | Rams | def. | Jumbos | ||||
| 54 | Catamounts | def. | Big Green | ||||
| 55 | Hawks | def. | Terriers 2 | ||||
| 56 | Terriers 1 | def. | Polar Bears | ||||
Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.09 means a rating gap counts about 8% less than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.
Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.